Complete list of press releases

  • EPA IGNORES GLOBAL WARMING POLLUTION FROM POWER PLANTS

    May 1, 2006
    Contact:  Jana Milford, 303-447-7200 , Vickie Patton, 303-447-7215
     
      
    A coalition of ten states and three environmental organizations took legal action today to remedy the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) failure to limit the global warming gases from the nation’s largest source of pollution.   The lawsuits challenge Clean Air Act rules issued on February 27, 2006 that were required to establish comprehensive emission standards for new coal-fired power plants.   In the rulemaking, EPA refused to establish standards for global warming pollution despite the fact that coal-fired power plants are the nation’s largest source of heat-trapping gases.  
     
    Environmental Defense also released new analysis today, based on government data, showing that the global warming pollution from power plants is projected to increase dramatically over the next 25 years. 
     
    “By ignoring the global warming pollution from power plants, EPA has left Americans with no solutions and no defense against the nation’s biggest source of global warming gases” said Environmental Defense senior scientist Dr. Jana Milford.    “The government’s own data project that annual global warming pollution from power plants will increase by over 1 billion tons by the time that today’s children reach adulthood, comparable to the heat-trapping pollution from nearly 200 million cars.” 
     
    The ten states filing a legal challenge today are:  California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin.  Environmental Defense, the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council also filed a legal challenge with representation by Earthjustice.
  • Texas School Bus Fleet Needs Diesel Cleanup

    April 5, 2006

    (April 5, 2006 — Austin)  A new report released by the non-profit group Environmental Defense warns of a number of serious health risks posed by diesel pollution inside Texas school buses and urges the Texas Legislature to help local districts speed up the replacement of older buses and install new high-tech filters on buses expected to remain in service awhile.

     

    “A Breath of Fresh Air” provides the first comprehensive inventory of Texas’ 35,000-plus school buses – by age and by region – and outlines affordable and available technology options that virtually eliminate on-board diesel pollution.

     

    “School buses are the safest way to get our children to school, but that doesn’t mean they’re perfect,” said Betin Santos of Environmental Defense. “The older the bus, the dirtier the exhaust that gets inside the cabin.  And Texas has a lot of old buses.”

     

    Diesel engines emit nearly 40 toxic substances and contribute to a laundry list of health problems including dizziness, asthma, chronic bronchitis and cancer risk. And studies have found that the pollution level inside a bus can be five times higher that in the ambient, outside air.

     

    Starting with the 2007 model year, new federal diesel standards will require dramatically reduced diesel emissions from school buses.  But buses made as late as this year can emit ten times the amount of harmful diesel particle pollution as next year’s buses will. Buses made before 1994 can emit 25 to 60 times as much.

     

    “The bad news is that there’s a problem,” Santos said. “The good news is there’s a practical and affordable solution.”

     

    For buses with years of service remaining, the report recommends two filter technologies that would capture the harmful pollution. And it notes that the state of Texas has already collected millions of dollars to fund “emission reduction programs”– a significant portion of which has gone unspent by the Legislature.

     

    “There’s money sitting in Austin – money Texans have paid in auto inspection and title fees, and some sales tax receipts – that was collected specifically for this type of cleanup effort,” Santos said. “We need the Legislature to see that this is one of the most tangible air quality projects it could fund. They need to free up the money needed to protect the health of our kids.” 

     

    The report concludes that despite some aggressive local efforts, only 10% of the state’s total fleet has been replaced with newer models, retrofitted with pollution control devices, or use clean fuels.

     

    “Local school districts are doing what they can, and some have gotten very creative in finding non-education funding for these cleanup projects,” Santos said.  “But they can’t fix the whole fleet without the state’s help.”

     

    The public can download copies of the report at http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/colin/TexasSchoolBusReportApril2006.pdf

  • Texas School Bus Fleet Needs Diesel Cleanup

    April 5, 2006

    The report can be downloaded in PDF format

    ( http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/colin/TexasSchoolBusReportApril2006.pdf )

     

    (April 5, 2006 — Austin)  A new report released by the non-profit group Environmental Defense warns of a number of serious health risks posed by diesel pollution inside Texas school buses and urges the Texas Legislature to help local districts speed up the replacement of older buses and install new high-tech filters on buses expected to remain in service awhile.

     

    “A Breath of Fresh Air” provides the first comprehensive inventory of Texas’ 35,000-plus school buses – by age and by region – and outlines affordable and available technology options that virtually eliminate on-board diesel pollution.

     

    “School buses are the safest way to get our children to school, but that doesn’t mean they’re perfect,” said Betin Santos of Environmental Defense. “The older the bus, the dirtier the exhaust that gets inside the cabin.  And Texas has a lot of old buses.”

     

    Diesel engines emit nearly 40 toxic substances and contribute to a laundry list of health problems including dizziness, asthma, chronic bronchitis and cancer risk. And studies have found that the pollution level inside a bus can be five times higher that in the ambient, outside air.

     

    Starting with the 2007 model year, new federal diesel standards will require dramatically reduced diesel emissions from school buses.  But buses made as late as this year can emit ten times the amount of harmful diesel particle pollution as next year’s buses will. Buses made before 1994 can emit 25 to 60 times as much.

     

    “The bad news is that there’s a problem,” Santos said. “The good news is there’s a practical and affordable solution.”

     

    For buses with years of service remaining, the report recommends two filter technologies that would capture the harmful pollution. And it notes that the state of Texas has already collected millions of dollars to fund “emission reduction programs”– a significant portion of which has gone unspent by the Legislature.

     

    “There’s money sitting in Austin – money Texans have paid in auto inspection and title fees, and some sales tax receipts – that was collected specifically for this type of cleanup effort,” Santos said. “We need the Legislature to see that this is one of the most tangible air quality projects it could fund. They need to free up the money needed to protect the health of our kids.” 

     

    The report concludes that despite some aggressive local efforts, only 10% of the state’s total fleet has been replaced with newer models, retrofitted with pollution control devices, or use clean fuels.

     

    “Local school districts are doing what they can, and some have gotten very creative in finding non-education funding for these cleanup projects,” Santos said.  “But they can’t fix the whole fleet without the state’s help.”

     

    The public can download copies of the report at http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/colin/TexasSchoolBusReportApril2006.pdf

  • Wave of Ocean Legislation Hits Congress

    March 30, 2006
    Contact: Amanda Leland, Environmental Defense, 202-572-3347
    (March 30, 2006 – Washington, DC) Representative Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) introduced bipartisan legislation to update the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) today, which governs fishery management activities within the federal 200-mile limit through eight Regional Fishery Management Councils. Gilchrest’s bill – H.R. 5051 - is based largely on the Senate version that passed the Senate Commerce Committee in December led by Senators Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Daniel Inouye (D-HI). Gilchrest’s bill contains several important conservation and economic reforms, including enhancing the role of science in decision-making, ending overfishing and strengthening the regional councils.
     
    “Representative Gilchrest’s legislation will lead to healthier oceans, more viable fishing communities, better recreational opportunities and supplies of fresh seafood,” said Environmental Defense Ocean Policy Specialist Amanda Leland. “Environmental Defense commends Gilchrest’s leadership to craft a workable solution.”
     
    Representative Richard Pombo (R-CA) also introduced a bill - H.R. 5018 - to reauthorize the MSA earlier this week. Pombo’s bill helps align economic incentives with conservation goals. It also authorizes cooperative research with fishermen and scientists, and creates a much needed funding mechanism for fisheries observers who collect data for conservation and management.  There are also measures in the bill that weaken current requirements for rebuilding overfished stocks to healthy levels and circumvent the environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act.  
     
    “Environmental Defense is encouraged by the wave of ocean legislation in Congress, which shows that our country is ready for a new era of ocean stewardship,” said Leland. “We look forward to working with the House to advance ocean conservation goals.” 
     
  • Statement by Environmental Defense on New CAF

    March 29, 2006
    “Today’s fuel economy announcement is disappointing. The Administration opened some of the right doors but hesitated to cross the threshold. 
     
    “The rule was a critical opportunity to address the twin perils of oil dependence and global warming.  On the most important issue, the level of the standard, the Administration increased the standard, but stopped short of what is needed to address these urgent challenges.  The final rule falls short even of what would be dictated by a reasonable and prudent economic analysis.  Despite higher forecast fuel prices, there was little change from the proposal, which had assumed gasoline would stay below $1.59 per gallon through 2025.  Indeed, the final rule calls for a slower rate of progress than the Administration’s previous effort.  Though the standards will help to mitigate oil consumption and global warming, they are not adequate to the task:  similar to cutting the Titanic’s engines slightly as it steams toward the iceberg.
     
     “We are especially disappointed that the Administration’s decision fails to account for the important benefits of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that are contributing to global warming.  Essentially, the Administration is saying that it places no value on preventing the serious consequences of climate change, which recent climate research indicates could include the future inundation of cities like Miami and New Orleans, if tipping points are surpassed.
     
     “Though we are encouraged by inclusion of largest SUVs and passenger vans, the decision not to include the largest pickups suggests that the Administration was unwilling to challenge the myth that largest pickups are used mostly as work trucks.  In fact, our research shows that most drivers of new large pickups use them for commuting and personal trips, and less than 5% of new pickup owners work in agriculture.
     
    “By resolving the longstanding competitiveness concerns that have blocked progress on fuel economy regulations, the structural reform that NHTSA has developed opens the door to strong improvements in the mileage standard.  Unfortunately, the Administration’s rule fails to take full advantage of this opportunity.”
     
  • Gulf Fishery Approves Red Snapper IFQ Plan

    March 23, 2006
    Contact:  Pam Baker, Environmental Defense, 361-510-5743
    (March 23, 2006 – Mobile, AL)   The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council voted late yesterday to adopt the region’s first “individual fishing quota” (IFQ) program for better management of the commercial red snapper catch.  Fishermen voted overwhelmingly in favor of the new plan with 87% of the weighted vote, and the Council has now sent the plan to the National Marine Fisheries Service in the U.S. Department of Commerce for implementation by January 1, 2007. 
     
    “Environmental Defense has been working with fishermen and local communities for over 10 years to
    help design and implement a red snapper fishing quota system that will revitalize our troubled
    fisheries and marine ecosystems,” said Regional Director for Environmental Defense’s Gulf of Mexico
    Program Pam Baker.  “We now look to the Commerce Department to implement the program as
    soon as possible to stop destructive fishing and get red snapper recovery on the right track.”
     
    In recent years, Gulf fishermen have found it increasingly difficult to earn a living, while fish stocks
    have continued to decline.  To solve the economic and environmental problems facing fisheries,
    Environmental Defense has been working closely with fishermen, government officials and other
    partners in the Gulf of Mexico to design new market-based management programs for red snapper,
    reef fish, shrimp and other key fisheries. 
     
    The new IFQ program is an essential step to move Gulf fisheries away from hazardous fishing, wasted fish and financial hardship, toward secure fishing privileges, economic incentives and healthy fisheries.  The red snapper IFQ program will serve as a model for other troubled commercial and recreational fisheries in the Gulf and has the support of fishermen.
     
    “Fishermen are hoping to get our lives back and put an end to the race for fish. An IFQ system should bring them better prices and bring a better product to consumers,” said Donny Waters, a snapper fisherman from Pensacola, Florida.  “These programs give us a bright outlook for the fishery’s future.”
     
    Recent hurricanes in the Gulf region have highlighted the need for better management to achieve sustainable fisheries.  Hurricane relief could help achieve conservation and economic objectives if it’s targeted to reduce overcapacity and overfishing by using tools like voluntary buy-back programs and IFQs.  Fisheries reform is also a national concern at this time as the Senate moves forward with reauthorizing the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, which governs all fishery management activities within the federal 200-mile limit.   
     
    To find out more about the red snapper IFQ programs, visit http://www.oceansalive.org/explore.cfm?subnav=article&contentID=5075  

    www.oceansalive.org

  • New Farmed Salmon Standards adopted by Wegmans and Bon App

    March 13, 2006

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Kathleen Goldstein, Environmental Defense, 202-841-0295
    Haven Bourque, Bon Appétit Management Company, 415-777-1170 x303
    Jeanne Colleluori, Wegmans Food Markets, 585-429-3627

    (March 13, 2006 – Boston, MA)  Wegmans Food Markets, one of the country’s most successful and innovative food retailers, and Bon Appétit Management Company, a leading food service company known for its ground-breaking sustainable sourcing practices, announced today at the Boston Seafood Show that they have adopted new purchasing policies to provide their customers with farmed king salmon that meets strong health and environmental criteria.  The policies were developed in consultation with Environmental Defense, a leading environmental advocacy organization.
     
    In recent years, the salmon farming industry has been surrounded by controversy as researchers reported that some farmed salmon contain relatively high levels of PCBs and other contaminants compared with wild salmon.  Conservation organizations have also raised concerns about the industry’s impact on wild salmon populations, use of drugs and other chemicals in raising salmon and the release of untreated wastes from salmon farms into coastal waters.  This collaborative project tackled all these issues, set aggressive performance targets for suppliers and requires regular reporting and third party verification of progress toward meeting these goals.
     
    The policies include new production standards that are the first to publicly and cooperatively address the most pressing health and environmental concerns surrounding salmon farming.  Among other changes, the purchasing standards set stringent criteria for levels of PCBs and other contaminants, require salmon producers to take unprecedented steps to reduce potential impacts on wild salmon populations and the marine environment, and reduce the dependence on wild-caught fish for use in salmon feed. 
     
    Under the standards, suppliers will research and implement innovative technologies and management strategies, such as integrating the farming of salmon and mollusks to recycle fish wastes and cut water pollution.  The policies require suppliers to meet at least five of the eight purchasing standards immediately, including the health criteria, and establish a timeline with strict deadlines for suppliers to comply with all of the standards.  The policies also provide incentives for developing new technologies and strategies that further reduce, and may eventually eliminate, the concerns over negative environmental impacts from salmon farming.
     
    “Environmental Defense applauds Wegmans and Bon Appétit for adopting these new standards and for challenging their suppliers to improve farming operations,” said Environmental Defense Director of Corporate Partnerships Gwen Ruta.  “Working together, we are providing consumers healthy and affordable salmon now, while promoting further innovation in farming practices.  We urge other purchasers to build on this progress by adopting similar purchasing policies.”
     
    King salmon complying with the purchasing policies are now arriving in Wegmans stores, and the retailer will work with its other farm-raised fish suppliers toward meeting similar standards.  Bon Appétit will continue to preferentially purchase wild salmon but, pending product testing, will over the next year give its chefs the option of purchasing farmed king salmon that meet the new standards.
     
    “Wegmans is starting with king salmon, not usually available at all to our customers except during the wild salmon run,” said Wegmans Vice President of Seafood Carl Salamone.  “We will eventually expand these standards to all our farmed seafood.  We want to offer our customers seafood that meets the strongest health and environmental standards of any U.S. retailer at an affordable everyday price.”
     
    “Bon Appétit Management Company is committed to serving our guests healthful and sustainably sourced food,” said Bon Appétit Management Company Chief Executive Officer Fedele Bauccio.  “While our first preference will always be for wild fish, we are proud of our participation in the development of farmed salmon standards that will drive environmental progress in the aquaculture industry.”
     
    These purchasing policies are also supported by the Monterey Bay Aquarium and its Seafood Watch program - a leader in providing guidance to consumers, retailers and restaurateurs on environmentally sound seafood.  
     
    “These standards represent a major improvement in the methods by which salmon can be farmed and brought to market,” said Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch Program Manager Jennifer Dianto.  “We’ve long encouraged the industry to embrace such standards.  Now we have something that can be a model for producers to follow.”
     
    To view a copy of the purchasing policies go to www.environmentaldefense.org/go/newsalmonstandards
     
    ###
     
    Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. is a 69-store supermarket chain with stores in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, and Maryland.  The family-owned company, founded in 1916, is recognized as an industry leader and innovator.  Wegmans has been named one of the ‘100 Best Companies to Work For’ by FORTUNE magazine for the nine consecutive years, ranking #1 in 2005 and #2 in 2006.  www.wegmans.com
     
    Bon Appétit Management Co. is an onsite restaurant company offering full food service management by providing café and catering service to corporations, universities and specialty venues. Bon Appétit is committed to sourcing sustainable, local food supplies for all cafés throughout the country. Bon Appétit is raising awareness of its sustainable sourcing practices through joint programs with Environmental Defense, the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch, and other organizations.  Based in Palo Alto, CA. Bon Appétit has more than 190 cafés in 26 states.  www.bamco.com

  • Environmental Defense, Frontline Farmers To Develop Plan for Cleaner Hog Farming

    March 9, 2006

    (Raleigh, NC)  Environmental Defense and Frontline Farmers today announced that they will work together to develop a voluntary plan and set of policy recommendations for putting alternative waste systems on hog farms in North Carolina, a move that will encourage the transition from traditional lagoons to the new technologies identified by NC State University after five years of research.  The groups saluted the university and project director Mike Williams and the advisory panel for their efforts, which identified five technologies that will enhance air and water quality.

    “With research completed, North Carolina is poised to lead the nation in sustainable hog production.  It’s time to turn research into reality and put the results – and the benefits – directly into the hands of farmers,” said Dan Whittle, senior attorney with the Raleigh-based office of Environmental Defense.  “The next step is to figure out how to make alternative technologies more affordable, and this won’t happen in a lab or pilot project.  There are a lot of motivated farmers who are stepping forward and want the new technologies as soon as possible.  They should get them, and be rewarded for their pioneer spirit.”

    “Environmental Defense is pleased to work with Frontline Farmers on a voluntary plan to help farmers get affordable access to new technologies in a timely manner,” said Whittle.

    “North Carolina farmers care deeply about protecting the environment and in protecting the health of our neighbors.  Alternative technologies can help us do that and still protect the future for our families and the pork industry,” said Lamont Futrell, president of Frontline Farmers, a North Carolina nonprofit, grassroots organization comprised of swine producers and their families.  The group has worked directly with researchers, environmental groups and other partners to identify  for and field test new technologies.

    “The NC State research has taught us a lot about opportunities to improve our farms, and we’ve seen technologies that have the potential to improve our environment,” said Futrell.  “I’d like hog farmers from around the country to visit our farms and see the opportunities that exist.”

    “The fastest way to claim the benefits of new technologies and reduce the cost is to install them on farms,” said Whittle.  “Putting a sufficient numbers of new technologies on the ground will increase competition, prompt engineering improvements and spur the development of markets for new by-products that will increase farm revenues.”

  • Bush Administration Supports Farm Subsidy Reform

    February 13, 2006

    WASHINGTON - February 13 - Environmental Working Group (EWG) President Ken Cook issued the statement below after hearing the Bush administration’s position on U.S. farm subsidies from a Council of Economic Advisers’ report issued today:

    “We commend the Bush administration for taking this bold position on farm subsidies and hope that they will put their shoulder to the political wheel to accomplish wide-ranging reform in the 2007 Farm bill.

    “An emphasis on ‘green’ environmental payments and reducing harm to developing countries is exactly what we need.”

    From 1995 to 2004, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data compiled by EWG, U.S. taxpayers spent $143,835,000,000 on American farm entities. Of that figure, the largest 10 percent of farm entities collected 72 percent – or $104 billion. Sixty percent of American farmers receive no subsidies.

    EWG researchers have tracked U.S. farm subsidies since 1995 and posted them in a free online database searchable by name, zip code, town, county, state and more. Visitors can find the database at http://www.ewg.org/farm.

  • Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp Comments On Ocean Conservationist And Author Peter Benchley's Passing

    February 13, 2006
    “It is with great sadness that we note the passing of Environmental Defense supporter Peter Benchley on Saturday, February 11.  Peter was a passionate, powerful, advocate for the Oceans.  Generous with his time and an engaging, entertaining speaker, Peter was the ideal ambassador for Environmental Defense’s ocean conservation work.  We remember with great appreciation his service on the National Council, the public events he headlined, and, more recently, the opinion pieces he co-authored with Environmental Defense calling on America to view her oceans as the national treasure they are, protecting them in the same way we have protected our great treasures on land in National Parks.  His dedication, energy and sense humor were an inspiration.  We will miss him greatly.”
     
  • Environmental Defense Praises Evangelical Leaders' Stand on Global Warming

    February 9, 2006

    CONTACT:  Charles Miller, 202-572-3364

    Here is a comment by Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp on today’s announcement by a group of evangelical leaders who support Federal legislation to curb the emission of greenhouse gases. 

    “This statement marks nothing less than a historic tipping point. Global warming isn’t a liberal issue or an issue that concerns just conservationists. Taking action — now — is a matter of values. It’s a moral issue, a mainstream issue that reflects a national consensus.”

    “These courageous leaders have said that global warming should be a concern to all who value God’s creation and that’s a mainstream, non-partisan message that makes sense whether you’re in South Carolina, Arkansas, California or Minnesota.”

    “Their support for a pro-business solution makes all the sense in the world. Capping greenhouse gas emissions will unleash a wave of American innovation. It will create new jobs and it’ll give the economy a boost.”

     

  • Change is Coming to U.S. Farm Policy

    February 7, 2006

    Washington, D.C., February 7, 2006 —The President’s budget confirms what farmers, ranchers, and observers have long known-significant changes to American farm policy are inevitable,” said American Farmland Trust (AFT) president Ralph Grossi. “The only questions are what will that change look like and who will develop the new policies?”

    American Farmland Trust (AFT) believes America’s farmers and ranchers, those who are caring for our land and ensuring Americans have a safe and healthy food supply, should be in charge of their own destiny. “While some in the agriculture community continue to close their eyes and call for extensions of existing programs, AFT is working with farmers and ranchers to strengthen American agriculture and expand environmental stewardship on working farms and ranches.”

    The proposed 2007 budget moves in the right direction by expanding support for renewable energy and funding conservation programs so farmers can afford to protect the environment and work the land. However, “the President undermined his commitment to farmers and ranchers by cutting the Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program by 50% from authorized levels. This proven program already is under-funded turning away three out of four farmers willing to permanently protect their land for future generations,” commented Grossi. “Congress should restore funding for FRPP to help stem the loss of our best farmland to development. These cuts are shortsighted. Once it’s gone, it is gone forever,” Grossi continued.

    “The administration’s proposal to change to crop insurance and payment limits must be addressed in the larger farm policy discussion not simply as a budget cutting measure. Instead of debating which program gets cut and by how much, we need to have an open, healthy dialogue with farmers and ranchers over our farm policy priorities and how to develop new policies for the future,” said Grossi.

    “Through its Farm Policy project, AFT is working with farmers and ranchers across the country to create practical solutions to maximize farm income through expanded market opportunities, payments that reward producers for creating a cleaner environment and tools to manage risk and a safety net in times of loss,” Grossi concluded.

    ###

    American Farmland Trust is a national nonprofit organization working with communities and individuals to protect the best land, plan for growth with agriculture in mind and keep the land healthy. As the leading advocate for farm and ranch land conservation, AFT has ensured that more than a million acres stays bountiful and productive. AFT’s national office is located in Washington, DC. The phone number is 202-331-7300. For more information, visit http://www.farmland.org/.

  • Westchester Board of Legislators Votes for Cleaner Air

    February 7, 2006
    (February 7, 2006- White Plains, New York) The Healthy Air Task Force, composed of the organizations listed above, applauds the County Board’s unanimous vote in favor of a bill that will reduce diesel air pollution in Westchester.  If signed into law by the County Executive, the bill
    will incorporate “best available” clean-diesel technology and cleaner diesel fuel (15 ppm sulfur content) in all diesel vehicles owned by or operated on behalf of the County.
     
    This bill will help safeguard air quality for schools, neighborhoods and business districts where construction equipment, trucks, buses and other diesel vehicles emit pollution.  

    “The Healthy Air Task Force commends the County Board for voting in favor of cleaner air in Westchester County,” said Adiel Gavish, program director for the Federated Conservationists of Westchester County (FCWC). She added, “This legislation will especially benefit those most greatly affected by air pollution, our children, the elderly and those with respiratory or heart ailments.”

    “This bill is a breath of fresh air for everyone who lives and works in Westchester County,” said Andy Darrell, regional director of Environmental Defense. “Diesel machinery is essential to our economy but creates soot and smog that is a direct threat to health.  Cost-effective technologies can cut diesel pollution by 90%.  If signed into law, this bill will attract the best available clean-diesel technologies to Westchester’s municipal fleets and Westchester will be leading the way toward a comprehensive, regional commitment to clean diesel.”

    “Rick Lepkowski, Westchester Regional Vice President of the American Cancer Society applauds the Westchester County Legislature for all the work it did in conjunction with the Healthy Air Task Force. Implementation of this bill is a step toward providing a healthier environment for the citizens of Westchester County.”

    “The passage of this legislation directly benefits the health of the children, ecosystem and citizens of Westchester County and takes a step towards a cleaner, more sustainable future,” said Emmett Pepper, program coordinator of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.  

    Background on Dangers of Diesel Pollution

    Tailpipe pollution is the biggest local threat to Westchester County’s air quality - over 75 percent of the cancer risk from air pollution in Westchester comes from a transportation-related source.  Diesel exhaust is especially dangerous, spewing a toxic stew of more than 40 cancer-causing compounds into the air.  Westchester County fails to meet the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s basic healthy air standards for ozone and soot (fine particulate matter).  Dirty diesel vehicles greatly contribute to high ozone and fine particulate matter levels.  

    The members of the Healthy Air Task Force came together to create the “Healthy Air Action Plan for Westchester”, published in January 2005 and available on-line at:
    http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/4274_HealthyAirWestchester.pdf  

    Cleaning up diesel pollution from municipal fleets and County-contracts was an essential recommendation of that Task Force.  

    “Non-road” diesel engines, like those used in construction equipment and commercial marine vessels, are often used for decades and emit more soot pollution than on-road cars and trucks combined.  This is why it is vital to target existing diesel engines now by installing clean diesel technologies in combination with the use of cleaner fuel.
    Cost-effective technologies for cleaning up dirty diesel engines are available now.  For more information, please visit Environmental Defense’s Cleaner Diesel Handbook at:
    www.cleanerdieselhandbook.org

  • Environmental Defense and ITDP Honor Seoul Mayor Myung-Bak Lee for Sustainable Transport Practices

    January 19, 2006
    Washington, DC – At a public reception on Sunday, January 22, Myung Bak Lee, the Mayor of Seoul, Korea will be honored with the 2006 Sustainable Transport Award for his leadership in dramatically enhancing Seoul’s livability through improvements to its mass transportation system and public spaces.
     
    In Seoul, a city of over ten million, Mayor Lee replaced a 4-mile elevated highway that once covered the Cheonggyecheon River in the city center with a riverfront park, high quality walkways, and public squares. Exclusive median bus lanes have been put on 36 miles of congested streets, speeding transit, and the city government is now planning to add additional bus lanes as part of a broader initiative to improve all aspects of the city’s bus system.
     
    Mayor Lee belongs to a new generation of bold mayors and governors around the world who are tackling seemingly intractable problems like traffic gridlock and air pollution – and winning.  “Managing traffic and expanding travel choices are keys to improving and sustaining Seoul’s economy, environment, and livability,” said Mayor Lee. “I am honored that our efforts are being recognized as a leading example for how cities around the world can simultaneously boost the quality of life for their citizens while helping to address the critical urban problems facing them,” he added.  Elected in 2002, Mayor Lee is currently a leading candidate for South Korea’s presidency.
     
    The Sustainable Transport Award is given each year by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, Environmental Defense, and US Transportation Research Board Committee ABE90.  The award recognizes a city that best exemplifies practices that reduce fuel use, emissions, and traffic accidents, improve mobility for the poor, and enhance the quality of space for pedestrians and bicyclists. Mr. Jung Woo Chang, Director of Seoul’s Transportation Improvement Bureau, will represent Mayor Lee at the award ceremony and reception at the Hilton Hotel in Washington, DC.
    ###
     
    Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 400,000 members.  Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems.  www.environmentaldefense.org
     
    The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) is a leading international non-profit organization founded in 1985 that promotes environmentally sustainable and equitable transportation worldwide. Its programs include bus rapid transit, congestion pricing, bicycle and pedestrian planning, brownfield revitalization, bicycle and cycle rickshaw modernization, the development of independent bicycle dealer cooperatives, and emerging work in health service delivery logistics. See: www.itdp.org
     
    The TRB Committee ABE90 is the lead committee for sustainable transport in emerging economies and fosters international research and dialogue (pendakur@interchange.ubc.ca).
  • New York City's Visionary Initiative To Cut Nitrogen Discharge By 60%

    January 10, 2006
    Contact:  Kathleen Goldstein, Environmental Defense, 202-572-3243
    New York City’s Visionary Initiative To Cut Nitrogen Discharge By 60%
     
    Nitrogen discharge from New York sewage plants that impairs the Long Island Sound ecosystem will be cut by nearly 60% by 2017, under a new agreement  between the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).  This commitment will meet the goals of the Long Island Sound 2003 agreement, which builds upon the Long Island Sound Study’s 1994 Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.  New York will become the first major city in the U.S. to reach for such an ambitious target, and the agreement is a model for how to restore our coastal ecosystems. 
     
    Environmental Defense comments:
     
    “This issue has plagued our coastal communities for over 30 years,” said Environmental Defense General Counsel Jim Tripp.  “Environmental Defense applauds New York’s leadership in pioneering a nitrogen removal plan that will serve as a model for the whole country.”
     
    “Too much nitrogen usually means too little oxygen.  Important fish and shellfish species are literally suffocating in the Sound.  This agreement will help them breathe easier,” said Environmental Defense Marine Scientist Jake Kritzer.
     
    “New York harbor and Long Island Sound once teemed with life, from dolphin to vast oyster beds,” said Environmental Defense New York Regional Director Andy Darrell.  “Cutting nitrogen flows from large New York City’s sewage plants by nearly 60% is a huge step toward restoring the natural bounty of this region’s waterways.  This comprehensive commitment is the strongest of any major US city — and sets the standard for all other clean-water programs in the region.”
     
    Background:
     
    New York City has agreed to retrofit four waste water treatment plants to remove 58.5% of the nitrogen from the city’s wastewater.  This decision will allow the state of New York to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nitrogen reduction goals, a target New York agreed to with Connecticut.
     
    Nitrogen is a natural and essential nutrient in coastal estuaries that is necessary for the synthesis of proteins by plants and animals.  When nitrogen supply is excessive, however, outbreaks or ‘blooms’ of aquatic algae occur.  When these now over-abundant algae die, the bacteria that break down the dead algal cells likewise proliferate.  The massive decomposition activity of these bacteria uses huge quantities of dissolved oxygen in the water, resulting in either hypoxia (i.e., very low levels of dissolved oxygen) or, in the most extreme cases, anoxia (absence of dissolved oxygen).  When this occurs, aquatic organisms have difficulty breathing, and are more susceptible to disease and death.   
     
    Human sources of nitrogen in Long Island Sound exceed natural sources by nearly 50%.  Of the various human sources, point-source inputs from wastewater treatment plants make up the largest proportion by far, and New York City is by far the biggest contributor of this point-source nitrogen.  This agreement to reduce point-source nitrogen by nearly 60% will result in a nearly 40% reduction in overall nitrogen inputs from human sources.  The EPA considers an average dissolved oxygen level of 5 mg/L to be ‘safe’ for aquatic organisms.  This reduction will achieve the target average level of 5 mg/L. 
     
    Jim Tripp, Environmental Defense General Counsel, has worked for years to finalize the Long Island Sound nitrogen agreement, primarily through his membership on the New York City Water Board and the former New York City DEP Citizens Advisory Committee.  Tripp has met with commissioners of both the City DEP and State DEC on many occasions throughout his involvement in City water issues.  He has always kept nitrogen reduction at the forefront of Environmental Defense’s priorities, and has helped negotiate the terms of the agreement to find a workable solution for all participants.     
    The following Environmental Defense spokespeople are available for comment:
    Jim Tripp, General Counsel
    Andy Darrell, Living Cities Program Director
    Jake Kritzer, Marine Scientist