Complete list of press releases

  • Environmental Defense Fund

    December 3, 2008

    (San Francisco - December 3, 2008) MBA students from top business schools across the country helped companies uncover energy efficiencies that could save $35 million in net operational costs over five years while preventing 57,000 tons of carbon pollution. These are the results of the Climate Corps program, a groundbreaking initiative designed by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) that trains business students to identify energy efficient strategies that will reduce the negative environmental impacts of company operations while benefitting the bottom line.

    EDF selected the 2008 Climate Corps Fellows from the University of Michigan, Stanford University and Rice University, among others and placed them in summer fellowships at companies such as Yahoo! Inc., Cisco, Intuit, NVIDIA, Salesforce.com, Crescent Real Estate and KKR. With technical support from EDF, Climate Corps fellows spent 12 weeks identifying and analyzing energy efficiency opportunities and developing detailed investment and implementation plans.

    In only a few weeks, the seven Climate Corps Fellows helped their host companies find efficiencies in lighting, computer equipment and heating and cooling systems to:
    • Save $35 million in net costs over five years;
    • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions per year by 57,000 metric tons – equivalent to taking more than 7,000 SUVs off the road and
    • Conserve more than 119 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year – enough to power 10,000 homes.

    Climate Corps Fellows also helped accelerate their host companies’ sustainability initiatives. “Cisco has committed to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions 25% by 2012. Our labs account for almost 70% of our carbon footprint, so we must reduce their energy consumption significantly in order to meet our goal. Our Climate Corps Fellow came on board so quickly that we got started on our R&D lab initiative several months sooner than expected,” said John Haley, senior manager, workplace resources, Cisco.

    “As a results-driven organization, EDF designed the Climate Corps program to help corporations realize real cost-savings through energy-efficiency while developing tangible sustainability strategies,’” said Millie Chu Baird, project manager for corporate partnerships at EDF. “Despite widespread discussion about the greening of business, many companies remain unaware of practical, cost-effective strategies they can take to capture both environmental and business benefits. Our next step is to grow the Climate Corps program and develop a set of best practices we can share with corporations around the country.”

    Through training and hands-on experience, Climate Corps Fellows acquire the hard skills they will need to tackle tough energy decisions they are likely to encounter later in their careers. “Climate Corps does a great job of educating the next generation of corporate environmental leaders,” said Christina Page, director, climate and energy strategy, Yahoo!.

    For year two of the Climate Corps program, EDF will work with Net Impact to recruit, train and place MBA-level Fellows in companies and widely share the first year’s results with business communities across the country. EDF and Net Impact are currently looking for forward-thinking businesses interested in hosting a 2009 Climate Corps fellow.

    “We are thrilled to partner with EDF on the Climate Corps program,” said Liz Maw, executive director, Net Impact. “Our network is full of talented, focused MBAs seeking to put their skills to use for social, environmental and economic good. We look forward to seeing economic and environmental results of this important work.”

    For more information, visit www.edf.org/climatecorps.

    ###

  • Major Businesses and Environmental Defense Fund Announce Joint Principles to Inform EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    December 2, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    Contacts:        Tony Kreindler, Environmental Defense Fund, (202) 445-8108
                              Mark MacLeod, Environmental Defense Fund, (202) 572-3377
                              Robert Wyman, National Climate Coalition, (213) 359-0091
                               Additional Contacts Listed Below
      
    (Washington, D.C. – December 2, 2008).   Today, a broad coalition of businesses and Environmental Defense Fund announced principles, jointly forged, to inform the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.   While the participants reflect a broad set of interests with divergent views, they are united in common cause by a commitment to work constructively on these issues.   
     
    The following businesses and Environmental Defense Fund (a national non-profit and non-partisan environmental advocacy organization) have signed on to these principles:
     
    American Electric Power
    Austin Energy/City of Austin, Texas
    Environmental Defense Fund
    National Grid
    PG&E Corporation
    Public Service Enterprise Group
     
    The following members of the National Climate Coalition:
     
    The AES Corporation
    American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
    3M Company
    NRG Energy, Inc.
    Reliant Energy, Inc.
    Texas Industries, Inc.

     

     


     
     
     
     
     
     
    The principles are set out in full below.

    Principles for Regulating GHG Emissions Under the Clean Air Act
     

    Working together, America has made landmark progress in protecting human health and the environment from air pollution.   This progress has been anchored in law, science, and economics, and advanced by the efforts of federal and state governments, businesses, academia, innovators, conservationists, and other allies. 

    These businesses and environmental organization share the following common beliefs:

    1.      The Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. EPA requires the EPA to determine whether greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare. This coalition believes that EPA will take prompt action.

    2.      Because stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere will require the transformation of our energy, manufacturing and transportation systems, Congress should be the authoritative body to undertake the essential work to craft comprehensive climate legislation. This legislation should define and integrate the appropriate roles of departments and agencies with expertise regarding our nation’s energy, environment, security and transportation programs.

    3.      While Congress deliberates, the nation can make common sense progress today under existing law in addressing greenhouse gas emissions.   EPA can develop a unifying national framework for regulating greenhouse gases.   We also recognize that state initiatives have an important role within the national framework. The partnership between the federal government and the states presents important policy questions of broad public interest.  

    4.      EPA regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, to the extent undertaken prior to further Congressional action, should use the authority that is best suited to address greenhouse gas emissions in the manner and according to the principles described below. EPA should advance policy actions that address the potential for unintended adverse consequences. We pledge to work together, with EPA, the Administration and Congress to identify areas of concern and to support a balanced and constructive path forward.

    While we may have divergent views on some specific aspects of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s role in regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, we respectfully offer the following jointly shared principles for agency action:

    Policy Action Rooted in Science.   EPA should root its actions in science, carrying out measures that are consistent with science-based imperatives and technological capabilities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.   Policy action to address greenhouse gases will present new technical and practical challenges.   EPA’s leadership in understanding and addressing the development of rigorous lifecycle analyses, the interactions among various pollutants, and the promise of emerging technologies will be invaluable.

    Consultation with Congress.   EPA should consult closely with Congress to integrate administrative and legislative responses.   EPA’s role in conducting transparent analysis for legislative initiatives will provide additional opportunity to strengthen coordination between the Agency and Congress.

    A Partnership with States and Local Governments.   There are a wide variety of views over design, implementation and integration of federal, state, and local greenhouse gas emissions reduction policies. While these present important issues to be resolved by federal and state policymakers, there is broad agreement that, in our system of government, all levels of government must work together in partnership if the nation is to effectively address this challenge.

    Public Outreach and Participation.   EPA must be committed to public outreach and participation, to ensure that those who have a stake in EPA’s policies have an opportunity to inform EPA’s policies.    

    Getting Started with Good Data.   EPA should meet the congressional deadlines for putting in place a mandatory greenhouse gas registry, and design a registry that builds from the foundation established by state registry programs.   Whether legislative or administrative, good policy action must be based upon good data.  
    Prioritizing Cost-Effective Reductions that Make Real Progress.   EPA should prioritize taking action to put in place policy measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are cost-effective, can be implemented and will make real progress with lasting benefits.  

    Early Action Must Be Recognized.   EPA policies should recognize that some private firms have voluntarily reduced greenhouse gas emissions in advance of mandates. These firms should receive credit for documented emission reductions that are leading the way.  

    Using Tools that Make Sense and Ensure Accountability.   The Clean Air Act architecture provides for flexibility mechanisms, performance standards, and source-specific emission limitations, depending on the source of emissions and the underlying statutory authority.   EPA should apply the tools that are best-suited to solving the problem.    In the stationary source arena, we believe programs that both ensure significant progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from existing sources with the greatest flexibility practicable and encourage investment in new clean technologies are most promising.   Conversely, we believe that it would not be constructive for EPA to establish national ambient air quality standards for carbon dioxide. These are complex issues and we commit to further prompt dialogue in this area to identify the appropriate elements of such a balanced program that secures emission reductions through cost-effective flexibility mechanisms.

    Integrated Multipollutant Planning.   There is a multi-faceted connection between greenhouse gas emissions and traditional airborne contaminants. When feasible, EPA’s policies should optimize investments in pollution controls to obtain cost-effective multi-pollutant benefits. 


    ###
     


    SIGNATORIES AND CONTACTS
     
    American Electric Power is one of the largest electric utilities in the United States, delivering electricity to more than 5 million customers in 11 states. AEP ranks among the nation’s largest generators of electricity, owning nearly 38,000 megawatts of generating capacity in the U.S. AEP also owns the nation’s largest electricity transmission system, a nearly 39,000-mile network that includes more 765 kilovolt extra-high voltage transmission lines than all other U.S. transmission systems combined. AEP’s headquarters are in Columbus, Ohio.   For more information, visit www.aep.com.
           Contact:       Melissa McHenry (614) 716-1120 

    Austin Energy, the City of Austin, Texas municipal utility is the 10th largest public power utility in the country with 380,000 customers and serving a population of 880,000.   The utility provides low-cost, reliable power and is nationally recognized for some of the most advanced and comprehensive energy efficiency and Green Building programs in the nation.   Under a recently announced “Climate Protection Plan” by the City of Austin, Austin Energy will offset, by 2020, the need for a 700 megawatt power plant through energy efficiency and load shifting initiatives, provide 30% of its generation portfolio with renewable energy, and achieve 100 megawatts of solar power by 2020.  For more information, visit www.austinenergy.com.
           Contacts:       Patricia Tierney Alofsin (512) 322-6009 or patricia.alofsin@austinenergy.com
                                   Ed Clark (512) 322-6514 or ed.clark@austinenergy.com

    Environmental Defense Fund is a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit   www.edf.org.
           Contacts:       Tony Kreindler (202) 445-8108 or tkreindler@edf.org
                                   Mark MacLeod (202) 572-3377 or mmacleod@edf.org
                                   Vickie Patton (720) 837-6239 or vpatton@edf.org
     
    National Grid (LSE: NG.; NYSE:NGG) is an international electricity and gas company and one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the world.   In the U.S., National Grid delivers electricity to approximately 3.3 million customers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Rhode Island, and manages the electricity network on Long Island under an agreement with the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA).   It is the largest distributor of natural gas in the northeastern U.S., serving approximately 3.4 million customers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Rhode Island.   National Grid also owns over 4,000 megawatts of contracted electricity generation that provides power to over one million LIPA customers. For more information, visit www.nationalgrid.com.
           Contact:        Chris Mostyn (718) 403-2747 or chris.mostyn@us.ngrid.com
     
    PG&E Corporation is an energy-based holding company and the parent company of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, one of the largest combined natural gas and electric utilities in the United States.  Based in San Francisco, the company delivers some of the nation’s cleanest energy to 15 million people in northern and central California.  For more information, visit www.pgecorp.com
           Contact:       Brian Hertzog (202) 662-2352 or brian.hertzog@pge-corp.com
     
    PSEG (Public Service Enterprise Group) operates one of the largest electric and gas companies in the US, and New Jersey’s oldest and largest publicly owned utility. PSEGis a publicly traded diversified energy company with annual revenues of more than $12 billion, and three principal subsidiaries: PSEG Power, PSEG Energy Holdings, and Public Service Electric and Gas Company. For more information, visit www.pseg.com.
           Contact:       Don McCloskey (973) 430-8555 or donald.mccloskey@pseg.com
     
    The Following Members of the National Climate Coalition:
           Contact:       Robert Wyman (213) 359-0091 or robert.wyman@lw.com
     
    AES is one of the world’s largest global power companies, with 2007 revenues of $13.6 billion. With operations in 29 countries on five continents, AES’s generation and distribution facilities have the capacity to serve 100 million people worldwide. Our 14 regulated utilities amass annual sales of approximately 76,000 GWh and our 124 generation facilities have the capacity to generate approximately 43,000 MW. Our global workforce of 28,000 people is committed to operational excellence and meeting the world’s growing power needs. To learn more about AES, please visit www.aes.com or contact AES media relations at media@aes.com.
           Contact:       Meghan Dotter (703) 682-6670 or meghan.dotter@aes.com

    American Honda Motor Co., Inc. is a leader in the development of leading-edge technologies to reduce CO2 emissions, including advanced gasoline engines, gasoline-electric hybrids, natural gas-powered engines, and hydrogen fuel cells. Founded in Japan in 1948, Honda began operations in the U.S. in 1959 with the establishment of American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda’s first overseas subsidiary. Honda began U.S. production of motorcycles in 1979 and automobiles in 1982. The company has invested more than $10.6 billion in its North American operations with 16 major manufacturing facilities, employment of more than 35,000 associates, and annual purchases of more than $18.8 billion in parts and materials from suppliers in North America.   For more information, visit www.honda.com
           Contact:       Edward B. Cohen (202) 661-4400 or Edward_Cohen@ahm.honda.com

    NRG Energy, Inc., a Fortune 500 company, owns and operates one of the country’s largest and most diverse power generation portfolios. NRG’s 48 plants provide approximately 24,000 megawatts of generation capacity—enough to power nearly 20 million homes. In November 2007, NRG won two of the industry’s highest honors—Platts Industry Leadership and Energy Company of the Year awards. Headquartered in Princeton, NJ, NRG is a member of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), a group of business and environmental organizations calling for mandatory legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. More information is available at www.nrgenergy.com.
           Contact:       Lori Neuman (609) 524-4525 or Lori.Neuman@nrgenergy.com
     

    3M is fundamentally a science-based, global, diversified technology company.  We produce thousands of imaginative products, and we’re a leader in scores of markets – from health care and highway safety to office products and optical films for LCD displays. Our success begins with our ability to apply our technologies – often in combination – to an endless array of real-world customer needs. Of course, all of this is made possible by the people of 3M and their singular commitment to make life easier and better for people around the world.   For more information, visit www.3m.com.
           Contact:       Jeff Muffat (612) 991-6003 or jcmuffat@mmm.com

    Reliant Energy, Inc. (NYSE:RRI) based in Houston, provides electricity to approximately 1.8 million retail customers primarily in Texas, including residential and small business customers. The company is also one of the largest independent power producers in the nation with more than 14,000 megawatts of power generation capacity across the United States.  These strategically located generating assets use natural gas, fuel oil and coal.  For more information, visit http://www.reliant.com.
           Contact:       Patricia Hammond (713) 497-7723 or phammond@reliant.com

    Texas Industries, Inc. (TXI) is the largest producer of cement in Texas and a major cement producer in California. TXI is also a major supplier of construction aggregates, ready-mix concrete and concrete products. For more information, visit www.txi.com
           Contact:       Randy Jones (972) 647-6701 or rjones@txi.com    

  • Florida's $5.5 Billion Reef Economy at Risk From Climate Change, Report Finds

    December 1, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contacts:
    Jerry Karnas - (941) 309-5399 or gkarnas@edf.org

    (Sarasota, Florida- December 1, 2008) A comprehensive new analysis of business generated by Florida’s coral reefs warns that more than 70,000 jobs and more than $5.5 billion in economic activity in the state are in grave jeopardy from climate change.

    “A business-as-usual approach to climate change could mean a lot less business for Florida,” said Jerry Karnas, Florida project director at Environmental Defense Fund, which commissioned the report, Corals and Climate Change: Florida’s Natural Treasures at Risk.

    Florida boasts the only shallow-water coral reefs in the continental United States – and those reefs are a centerpiece of South Florida’s economy. Like coral reefs worldwide, Florida’s are under siege from a range of environmental challenges that could lead to huge economic losses in the state.

    The groupers, snappers, jacks, angelfish, and spiny lobsters that thrive on coral reefs make Florida a destination for millions of fishermen every year – and back up Florida’s claim to be the Fishing Capital of the World. On the commercial side, catches of reef-associated species in South Florida account for $158 million in annual sales.

    Terry Gibson, the Fishing Editor of Outdoor Life magazine and a co-author of the report with University of Miami Professor Hal Wanless, noted that “from scuba diving in the Keys to charter fishing boats in Miami-Dade to commercial fishing in Martin County, reef-related sales amount to more than $5.5 billion each year.”

    But climate change driven by unchecked greenhouse gas emissions is stressing coral reefs and putting the Florida economy at risk. According to Wanless, “a central culprit in the decline of coral reefs is unchecked emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, largely from burning fossil fuels like coal and oil.”

    New research by Florida scientists is providing surprising new insights into how CO2 and other greenhouse gases hurt coral reefs. First, global warming leads to warmer oceans – which cause harmful coral “bleaching” and make corals more vulnerable to diseases – as is now visible on many of Florida’s coral reefs. As the report describes, innovative research by Dr. Kimberly Ritchie of the MOTE Marine Lab in Sarasota helps explain why: during times of warmer ocean water, corals lose their ability to use natural antibiotics to protect themselves from disease.

    Research by another Florida scientist, Professor Andrew Langdon of the University of Miami, shows another way in which greenhouse gases harm coral reefs: as oceans absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, they become more acidic, which stunts coral growth and impairs reproduction.

    EDF’s Karnas said quick federal action to limit greenhouse gas emissions can help protect Florida’s reefs and the state’s economy. “We need Congress to cap global warming pollution. This report shows that doing nothing is the worst option for Florida’s economy.”

    To see the full report, please visit edf.org/floridacorals.

    ###

    About Environmental Defense Fund

    Environmental Defense Fund is at the forefront of an innovation revolution, developing new solutions that protect the natural world while growing the economy. Founded in 1967 and representing more than 500,000 members, the group creates powerful economic incentives by working with market leaders and relying on rigorous science. For more information, visit edf.org.

  • California Economy Will Benefit from Implementing Global Warming Solution Act, Study Shows

    November 24, 2008

    (Sacramento, CA - November 20, 2008) California stands to reap substantial economic benefits from implementing The Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32), according to a soon-to-be-released study sponsored by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). EDF economist and policy scientist, Dr. James Fine, will preview the findings of the report during his testimony today at the only public meeting by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on its proposed implementation plan to meet AB 32’s mandate to reduce California’s greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 30 percent by 2020.

     
    “As President-elect Barack Obama succinctly stated earlier this week, a strong climate policy such as AB 32 can help solve California’s energy, economic and environmental challenges,” testified Fine. “It is clear from the Air Resources Board’s economic analysis and from several other studies at the state, regional and national level, that fighting global warming delivers economic benefits and creates well-paying green jobs. This economic stimulus is particularly critical as California battles high rates of unemployment and budget shortfalls.”
     
    The report sponsored by EDF was conducted by M.Cubed, a research firm specializing in resource economics and public policy analysis. It examines recent analyses CARB and other groups have conducted to assess the potential economic consequences associated with AB 32. The EDF/M.Cubed study finds that well-crafted policies are likely to result in employment growth and reinforce beneficial changes in California’s economy that have already emerged from existing energy policies. Key findings of the study include: 
     
    • California is well positioned to lead the nation’s transition to a clean energy economy because of actions taken during the past several decades.
    • The adoption of similar efforts to reduce emissions by other states that are following California’s lead – and proposed under the incoming Obama administration – can protect California jobs and give California a competitive advantage in the low-carbon economy.
    • Emphasis on renewable energy technologies will create jobs.
    • California’s friendly regulatory setting will attract increased energy-related research and development investment into the state.
    • Market-based policies that help bridge economic shifts and expand access to financing will help to minimize adverse consequences on particularly vulnerable populations.
    While the AB32 scoping plan makes economic sense, it does not set out a clear course for ensuring timely implementation of land use and transportation measures that are proven to reduce both toxic and global warming pollution, such as congestion pricing and indirect source rules that cut air pollution from new development projects.
     
    “CARB has more authority than this document suggests it has to ensure that proven measures such as the indirect source rule are implemented,” testified Kathryn Phillips, manager of EDF’s California Clean Air for Life Campaign. “It should establish a deadline by which CARB must develop clear guidance for air districts to ensure that those indirect source rules that districts develop capture as many greenhouse gas reductions as possible while still allowing for the housing and commercial and industrial development the state needs. It should also raise the statewide target for land use/transportation system reductions from the 5 million metric tons to at least 11 million metric tons.”
  • GEMI and Environmental Defense Fund Release New Guide to Inspire the Next Generation of Successful Corporate-NGO Partnerships

    November 20, 2008

    (Washington, DC – November 20, 2008) Today, the Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) released the “Guide to Successful Corporate-NGO Partnerships,” a comprehensive resource for designing, implementing and measuring the benefits of partnerships between businesses and non governmental organizations (NGOs).

    The Guide provides detailed recommendations for both businesses and NGOs looking to develop successful partnerships, and relevant case examples based on EDF’s twenty years of success working with corporations and GEMI member companies’ experiences. While the Guide focuses on environmentally driven partnerships, lessons learned can be adapted to a wider range of partnerships, including those focusing on community development, health and other social issues.

    “Business-NGO partnerships, if designed and executed effectively, can achieve remarkable results and inspire the next generation of successful partnerships,” said Steve Rutledge, GEMI partnership project work group co-chair and manager, integration & governance, Duke Energy. “We hope the Guide will assist in educating GEMI member companies as well as non-member companies and the public sector on the benefits of successful collaboration between corporations and NGOs.”

    “Environmental Defense Fund has a long legacy in partnering with companies to achieve substantial environmental and business results,” said Kyle Cahill, director of corporate engagement, Environmental Defense Fund. “In today’s economy, collaboration and the sharing of ideas between NGOs and companies will only grow in importance. We hope this Guide encourages further collaboration and demonstrates how environmental efforts can strengthen the bottom line.”

    The Guide provides an in depth overview of the key drivers behind business-NGO partnerships, best practices in project design, project implementation and measurement. It also showcases specific examples of business-NGO partnerships covering a range of environmental opportunities from transportation to energy efficiency to habitat restoration to nanotechnology. While companies can help the environment and society in many ways, including through philanthropic activities, the Guide distinguishes business-NGO partnerships from corporate philanthropy. GEMI and EDF believe the most effective partnerships do not rely on financial contributions. Rather, a partnership occurs when independent organizations bring together their distinct views, resources and expertise to work towards a common goal.

    “Private sector leaders recognize that they should develop strategies to meet social and environmental needs while remaining profitable,” said Mark Hause, GEMI partnership project work group co-chair and global environmental competency leader, DuPont. “At the same time, many of the most effective NGOs recognize that they can achieve widespread and lasting change by harnessing the power of the market.”

    GEMI and EDF will be launching the Guide today, November 20 at 3:00pm EST via conference call and webinar.

    • CALL-IN INFORMATION: 1-866-502-6991 (international participants: 720-239-9060), Participant code: 2025806285# NOTE: *Please keep your phone on mute so that background noises do not interfere with the presentation.

    • LOG-IN INFORMATION: PLEASE log-in 10 minutes prior to the webinar as we will begin promptly at 11:00am EDT. Go to https://meetingvisuals.webex.com/meetingvisuals/j.php?ED=110089737&RG=1&UID=0 Register for the meeting. (Meeting number: 599 978 863). Check for confirmation email with instructions on how to join.

    To obtain more information or to download a copy of the Guide, please visit www.gemi.org or www.edf.org/partnershipguide.

    ###

    Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. Environmental Defense Fund has a 20 year track record of success in partnering with business. To maintain its independence and credibility, EDF accepts no money from corporate partners; generous individuals and foundations fund its work. For more information, visit www.edf.org.

    The Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI) is a non-profit organization of leading companies dedicated to fostering environment, healthy and safety excellence and corporate citizenship worldwide. Through the collaborative efforts of its members, GEMI also promotes a worldwide business ethic for environmental, healthy and safety management and sustainable development through example and leadership. For more information, visit www.gemi.org

    GEMI members include: 3M; Abbott; Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; BNSF Railway Company; Cadbury Schweppes PLC; Cargill, Inc.; Carnival Corporation & PLC; The Coca-Cola Company; ConAgra Foods; The Dow Chemical Company; Duke Energy; DuPont; Eastman Kodak Company; Ecolab, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; FedEx; Johnson & Johnson; Johnson Controls, Inc.; JohnsonDiversey, Inc.; Koch Industries, Inc.; Kraft Foods Inc.; Merck & Company, Inc.; Motorola, Inc.; Novartis Corporation; Occidental Petroleum Corporation; Owens Corning; Perdue Farms, Inc.; Pfizer Inc; The Procter & Gamble Company; Roche; Schering-Plough Corporation; The Scotts Company; Smithfield Foods, Inc.; Southern Company; Vulcan Materials Company; and, Wyeth.

  • Statement by EDF President Fred Krupp in Reaction to President-elect Obama's Greeting to Bi-Partisan Governors Climate Summit

    November 18, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact: Tony Kreindler, EDF, 202-210-5791 (cell), or 202-572-3378 (w)

    (Washington—November 18, 2008) President-elect Obama got it exactly right: the effort to create millions of jobs and restore American leadership will “start with a federal cap and trade system.” His approach to dealing with our economic, energy, and environmental problems together makes a huge amount of sense. He’s clearly rejecting the timid, business-as-usual approach that often keeps Washington from solving our biggest problems. His plan – to reduce emissions to their 1990 levels by 2020 and an additional 80% by 2050 – will jump-start job creation in new energy industries, and take a huge step toward solving climate change. We strongly applaud President-elect Obama’s statement today, and his leadership on this issue.

    About Environmental Defense Fund

    A leading national nonprofit organization, Environmental Defense Fund represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit edf.org

  • Group Wins Public Health Benefits in ICC Suit Settlement

    November 17, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     
    Contact:
    Michael Replogle, 301-529-0351-c, mreplogle@edf.org
    Sean Crowley, 202-572-3331, scrowley@edf.org
     
    (Washington, DC - November 17, 2008) Maryland has settled a suit filed by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) over the controversial Intercounty Connector (ICC) by agreeing to vital public health benefits to offset the impacts of air pollution generated by the highway.
     
    EDF’s suit alleged that state and federal agencies violated the Clean Air Act and other federal laws when they approved the ICC, a multi-billion dollar, six-lane, 18-mile toll highway connecting I-95 and US-1 in Prince George’s County with I-270/I-370 in Montgomery County. 
     
    As part of the settlement, the Maryland State Highway Administration agreed to invest a total of $2 million to:
    1. Reduce air pollution from school buses in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties.
    2. Install new monitoring equipment that will provide new insight into how fine soot pollution from traffic affects public health for those living, working, or attending schools near major highways in the Washington, DC region.
     
    As its part of the settlement, EDF agreed to withdraw its appeal of a September 2007 federal district court ruling that upheld federal approval of the ICC.
     
    “This settlement will help offset some of the adverse effects of the ICC on public health,” said Dr. John Balbus, EDF’s Chief Health Scientist and a member of the Children’s Health Protection Advisory Committee for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “It also will provide important data on levels of fine particulate air pollution near high traffic volume roads like I-95. This pollution contributes to premature death, respiratory diseases, cancer, and heart disease in children and adults who live, work, or go to schools near major highways.”
     
    ”We hope this settlement will persuade the state in the future to consider more cost-effective transportation investments that would better relieve traffic congestion, not to build highways like the ICC that negatively impact public health, streams, parks, global warming, and nearby communities,” said Michael Replogle, EDF’s Transportation Director, a former consultant for the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and former transportation coordinator for Montgomery County.   “Although the state has only begun construction, cost overruns for the ICC are foreclosing important transportation investments across Maryland and already have forced delays in parts of the ICC project itself.”
     
    “The ICC remains an imprudent investment choice that, if completed, will promote sprawl and global warming pollution,” concluded Replogle. “If the ICC construction continues, it also will offset many of the positive initiatives the state is taking to address climate change and to counter degradation of the Chesapeake Bay and the Anacostia watershed.”
     
    More information on the impacts of the ICC can be found at: http://www.edf.org/article.cfm?ContentID=4220
     
    ###
     
    Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org.

     

  • New

    November 17, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Sean Crowley, 202-572-3331-w or 202-550-6524-c, scrowley@edf.org
     
    (New York, NY – November 17, 2008) In response to transit agencies being on the verge of financial collapse, Environmental Defense Fund launched a new ad campaign today to call for a strong state and city commitment to transit. The ad features a photo of a blood transfusion bag alongside the message: “Transit Lines are Lifeblood. Stop the Bleeding” and includes a web page link, www.edf.org/transit, for more information.
     
    “Transit is the lifeblood of New York City’s economy and environment. Now more than ever, we need this lifeline to work,” said Andy Darrell, vice president for Living Cities at Environmental Defense Fund, a member of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Sustainability Advisory Board and the 2007 New York State Traffic Mitigation Commission. “Other world-capitals are investing in transit, so New York simply can’t afford to fall behind with crumbling infrastructure and gridlock.”
      
    The campaign includes full page, full color ads in the: Albany Legislative Gazette, and Manhattan Media publications The Capitol and City Hall. It also features web ads in the New York Daily News Daily Politics blog (http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/), the Albany Times Union Capitol Confidential blog (http://blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/), the New York Observer Politicker blog (http://www.politickerny.com/) and the Gotham Gazette (www.gothamgazette.com/).
     
    Nationally, transportation is the number two household spending item — second to shelter and ahead of food — and is responsible for 30% of the national greenhouse gas emissions. It is the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gases in New York.
     
    “Imagine New York City with the subways unplugged,” concluded Darrell. “From suburban trains to city subways, transit is at the heart of what New York is all about. A sustainable and affordable ride to work connects people to jobs, lowers greenhouse gas pollution, and fights traffic congestion. Investing in innovative transit will create a new wave of green jobs in New York, from building subway cars and bus-rapid-transit lanes to designing high-tech train signals and hybrid-electric buses.”
     
    To solve the transit finance challenge, Environmental Defense Fund calls for:
     
    1.      A transparent capital plan for our transit system that:
     
    ·        Better uses what we have, with technology to allow more trains and buses per line.
     
    ·        Prioritizes investments that deliver jobs and service quickly, such as bus-rapid-transit, suburban park-&-ride, and vanpools to connect low-transit neighborhoods to transit stops.
     
    ·        Focuses on neighborhoods without good transit options, especially in fast-growing communities outside of Manhattan that lack convenient subway access.
     
    ·        Is clear to the public about its priorities and service decisions.
     
    2.      State and city cooperation to keep fare hikes as low as possible. We’ll all have to pitch in, but government should be doing everything it can to make transit affordable.
     
    3.      Employers to do their part, by enrolling in programs to subsidize transit passes (such as TransitChek)
     
    4.      Keeping all financing options on the table, including controversial ideas such as road pricing.  New York will have to take difficult steps to finance transit, and any new tools must be designed to be effective and fair.  
     
    Transit has improved since the 1970s. We can’t let it backslide now.
     
    ###
     
    Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org.
  • Cabinet Secretaries, Members of Congress, Scientists Create Roadmap to End Overfishing Crisis, Grow Fishing Economy

    November 13, 2008

    The economic and environmental disaster of overfishing can be stopped with a straightforward update of fishing regulations, according to Oceans of Abundance, a new report released today by a bipartisan working group of two dozen economic and environmental leaders and scientists.  The full report is available at www.OceansOfAbundance.org.

    “President-Elect Obama faces depleted fisheries that have caused painful job loss and a ticking litigation clock if legal deadlines to end overfishing by 2011 aren’t met,” said Bruce Babbitt, co-chair of the working group and former Secretary of the Interior and Arizona governor. “The good news is that new science clearly points the way to recovery.”

    “Overfishing is one environmental crisis that President-Elect Obama and Congress can actually solve in the near-term,” said Norm Mineta, working group member and former Commerce and Transportation secretary. 

    The group recommends widespread adoption of “catch shares,” a fishery management system that gives fishermen the flexibility to determine how and when to best meet scientific catch targets. Recent research published in the journals Science and Nature shows that catch shares can stop, and even reverse the collapse of fisheries worldwide while increasing the abundance of fish that can be caught. 

    “The leaders who developed these recommendations share a conviction that catch shares are, by far, the best way to manage the nation’s fish stocks,” said former Rep. James Greenwood from Pennsylvania, co-chair of the working group and president and CEO of the Biotechnology Industry Association.  “Our conclusions are rooted in science, economics, experience, and a realistic assessment of what can be accomplished over the next few years.”

    Catch shares set mandatory scientific targets and give fishermen maximum flexibility in choosing how to meet that target.  The mandatory target holds fishermen accountable to catching only the allowable amount of fish.  The flexibility gives fishermen the chance to improve their efficiency, and allows them to benefit as they help restore the oceans.  The value of their shares increases as the health of the resource improves.  The combination of private accountability and flexibility works better than having the government try to manage the details of the fishing business, the working group found.

    The stakes of the overfishing crisis are enormous as the food supply of one billion people is in jeopardy, along with 200 million associated jobs worldwide.   “Catch shares are a powerful way to secure fish populations that people around the globe rely on for their main source of protein,” said working group member Jeffrey Sachs, director, The Earth Institute at Columbia University.

    Science-based catch shares, wherever implemented, make fish more abundant and fisheries more profitable.  Catch shares also protect ocean productivity and diversity more effectively than traditional management. Economists at the University of California, Santa Barbara estimate that catch shares will easily double the value of U.S. fisheries.

    The report urges President-Elect Obama to ensure that all federal fishery management plans are evaluated for catch shares by 2012, and that at least half of all plans feature catch share management by 2016.  Other management programs would be required to match the same level of economic and environmental performance.

    The working group also urges Congress to ease bottlenecks to the President’s goal by passing legislation requiring catch shares be considered in all federal fishery management plans by 2012.

    ###

    The Oceans of Abundance working group was convened by the Environmental Defense Fund and the Marine Conservation Biology Institute to present policymakers with achievable methods, based on the most current scientific consensus, to reverse the economic and environmental decline of U.S. fisheries and the communities that depend on them.  World Wildlife Fund contributed content to the report.  Support for the report was provided by the Walton Family Foundation.  www.OceansOfAbundance.org

     

    The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) is a leading national nonprofit organization representing more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, EDF has linked science, economics and law to create innovative, equitable and cost-effective solutions to society’s most urgent environmental problems. Environmental Defense Fund is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including future generations. Among these rights are access to clean air and water, healthy and nourishing food, and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, Environmental Defense Fund evaluates environmental problems and works to create and advocate solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-efficient and fair. Environmental Defense Fund believes that a sustainable environment will require economic and social systems that are equitable and just.  www.edf.org

     

    The Marine Conservation Biology Institute (MCBI) began in 1996, to encourage scientists who want to safeguard the oceans’ web of life. Since then, MCBI has become one of the world’s most influential marine conservation organizations, with the mission to advance the science of marine conservation biology and secure protection for ocean ecosystems. Science is central to MCBI. If something isn’t both true and important, MCBI will not advocate for it.  MCBI cooperates with researchers, fishermen, conservationists, business people, legislators, government officials, educators, reporters, to help conserve the oceans’ biodiversity.  MCBI believes that marine ecosystem-based management is the way to protect, recover and sustainably use the living sea. MCBI uses just one measure to gauge success: Are we making a difference in the sea, where it counts? The answer is “yes.”  MCBI’s people are very proud of what they’ve achieved, but recognize there is still much more that needs to be done.  www.mcbi.org

     

    The World Wildlife Fund is the world’s largest conservation organization, working in 100 countries for nearly half a century. With the support of almost 5 million members worldwide, WWF is dedicated to delivering science-based solutions to preserve the diversity and abundance of life on Earth, stop the degradation of the environment and combat climate change. www.worldwildlife.org.    

     

    Oceans of Abundance working group members include:

     

    Secretary Bruce Babbitt (co-chair): Former U.S. Secretary of the Interior; former Governor of Arizona, chairman, World Wildlife Fund

     

    Congressman James C. Greenwood (co-chair): President and CEO, Biotechnology Industry Organization; former U.S. Representative (8th District, Pennsylvania); Board of Directors, Marine Conservation Biology Institute

     

    Congressman Sam Farr: 17th District, California; co-chair, House Oceans Caucus

     

    Congressman Wayne Gilchrest: former U.S. Representative (1st District, Maryland); former chair, House Resources Fisheries and Oceans Subcommittee

     

    Congressman Rush Holt: 12th District, New Jersey; member, House Natural Resources Committee

     

    Senator Connie Mack Senior: Policy Advisor, King and Spalding; former U.S. Senator (Florida)

     

    Secretary Norman Mineta: Vice Chairman, Hill and Knowlton; former U.S. Secretary of Commerce; former U.S. Secretary of Transportation; former U.S. Representative (13th and 15th Districts, California)

     

    Governor Christine Todd Whitman: President, Whitman Strategy Group; former Governor of New Jersey; former

    Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; former chair, Pew Oceans Commission

     

    Secretary Mike Chrisman: Secretary for Resources, State of California; Chair, California Ocean Protection Council

     

    Dr. Christopher Costello: Professor of Environmental and Resource Economics, University of California Santa Barbara

     

    Dr. Dan Esty Hillhouse: Professor of Environmental Law and Policy, Yale University; Clinical Professor of Law, Yale Law School

     

    Dr. Steve Gaines: Professor of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, Director, Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara

     

    Terry Garcia: Executive Vice President, National Geographic Society; former Deputy Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

     

    Dr. Les Kaufman: Professor of Biology, Boston University; Principal Investigator, Marine Management Area Science

    Program, Conservation International

     

    Dr. Jane Lubchenco: Wayne and Gladys Valley Professor of Marine Biology, Oregon State University; former President, American Association for the Advancement of Science; member, National Academy of Sciences; member, Pew Oceans Commission

     

    N.J. Nicholas, Jr.: Chairman, Environmental Defense Fund; Member, Council on Foreign Relations; former President, Time, Inc.  

     

    Dr. John Ogden Director: Florida Institute of Oceanography; Professor of Biology, University of South Florida

     

    Wendy Paulson: Chairman, RARE; President’s Conservation Council, The Nature Conservancy

     

    Dr. Ellen Pikitch: Executive Director, Institute for Ocean Conservation Science; Professor, School of Marine and

    Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University

     

    Dr. Andy Rosenberg: Professor, Natural Resources Policy and Management, University of New Hampshire; former Deputy Director, National Marine Fisheries Service; Commissioner, U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy

     

    Dr. Jeffrey Sachs: Director, The Earth Institute, Columbia University; Special Advisor to Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations

     

    Dr. Bob Steneck: Professor of Oceanography, Marine Biology and Marine Policy, University of Maine

     

    Christophe A.G. Tulou: Principal, Christophe Tulou Associates; Director, Sustainable Oceans, Coasts and Waterways Program, The Heinz Center; Executive Director, Pew Oceans Commission

    #

     

  • Texas Environmentalists Praise By-the-Mile Auto Insurance Option

    November 12, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:  Ramon Alvarez, Environmental Defense Fund, 512. 691.3408-w
    Media Contact: Chris Smith, Environmental Defense Fund, 512.691.3451-w or 512.659.9264-c or csmith@edf.org
    (Austin – Nov. 12, 2008) Environmental Defense Fund praised MileMeter for recently launching a pay-as-you-drive (PAYD) insurance program that will reward low-mileage drivers with lower premiums than traditional, flat-rate insurance.
    Texans will become the first in the nation to have a “by-the-mile” choice of auto insurance that gives drivers the opportunity to save money while also protecting the environment. “Texas drivers now have a choice to do the right thing by their pocketbooks as well as by the environment,” said Ramon Alvarez, senior scientist with Environmental Defense Fund. “Pay-as-you-drive insurance policies help to increase our awareness of how many miles we’re driving and therefore, think twice before making an optional trip to the store, or better yet, walk, bike or use public transportation to get there instead.”
    Traditional insurance offers 15 percent or less mileage-based discounts that don’t typically capture the full benefit of driving fewer miles. However, insurers are slowly moving in this direction. Progressive Insurance has in the last five months also launched partial mileage-based insurance policies in seven states, offering 40 to 60 percent mileage-based discounts. GMAC Insurance also offers up to 40 percent mileage-based discounts in several dozen states for motorists with On-Star equipped vehicles.
     
    “By providing a strong monetary incentive to drive fewer miles, these policies also have the added environmental benefit of reducing traffic, air pollution, dependence on foreign oil and greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming,” Alvarez added.
     
    A Brookings Institution report released in July estimates that if PAYD were offered to all drivers, it would save two-out-of-three households an average of $270 per car, result in an 8 percent decline in driving, reduce driving-related damages by $50 billion to $60 billion, and cut carbon dioxide emissions and oil consumption. 


     
  • Poll: Majority of Americans Want Action on Climate to Rebuild U.S. Economy

    November 11, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Tony Kreindler, 202-572-3378 (office), 202-210-5791 (cell), akreindler@edf.org
     
    (Washington, DC – November 11, 2008) According to new post-election poll results released today by Environmental Defense Fund, a majority of Americans say that given the current economic crisis, now is the time to address climate change — because investing in clean energy will create millions of new jobs and rebuild the economy.
     
    The survey, conducted by respected Democratic pollster Douglas E. Schoen, also found that two-thirds of Americans think investments in economic stimulus should be funded with revenue from large companies paying for the global warming pollution they emit – rather than tax hikes or more borrowing that increases the national debt.
     
    “The public thinks there’s not a minute to waste,” said Steve Cochran, national climate campaign director at EDF. “They want economic revitalization and action to address global warming to go together, and they want it paid for.”
     
    The national survey was conducted on the evening of November 4th. Its goal was to measure public support for climate change legislation amid a time of economic recession and in anticipation of a new President and Congress.
     
    Full results are available online at edf.org/electiondaypoll.  Key findings include:
     
    -         Fifty-eight percent of respondents said investments in new, clean energy could create millions of new jobs, so now is the time to address climate change.
     
    -         Sixty-six percent said that Congress should fund economic stimulus with revenue generated from large companies that pay for the global warming pollution they create, rather than new taxes or more borrowing.
     
     
    -         Over three-quarters said it is important to address the problem of global warming, and half of the sample says that the issues of oil addiction and economic problems need to be addressed together.
     
    The poll, conducted by telephone with a random sample of the American population, asked voters about the election, as well as a specific series of questions about environmental issues, climate change, and some of the tradeoffs facing the new administration. The margin of error for this poll is +/- 3.5%.
     
    ###
     
    Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org.
     
     
     
    Environmental Defense Fund National Poll
    Survey of 600 Voters in Presidential Election
    November 4, 2008
     
    1.      Who did you vote for?
    ·        44% John McCain
    ·        53% Barack Obama
    ·        1% Bob Barr
    ·        1% Ralph Nader
    ·        1% Some other candidate
               
    2.      Given our economic situation, which comes closer to your view?
    ·        58% Investments in new, clean energy could create millions of new jobs, so now is the    time to address the problems of global warming and climate change.
    ·        30% It is less important to address the problems of global warming and climate change, given the high energy prices and economic downturn in our country
    ·        11% Not sure
     
    3.      Generally speaking, do you think it is very important, somewhat important, not very important, or not at all important to address the problems of global warming and climate change?
    ·        48% Very important
    ·        30% Somewhat important
    ·        14% Not very important
    ·        8% Not at all important
    ·        1% Not sure
     
    4.      Which of the following would you say is the best way to create jobs and stimulate the economy?
    ·        39% Investment in building clean energy products, thus promoting energy independence and creating manufacturing jobs
    ·        7% Investing in road and bridge repair
    ·        27% Cutting government spending
    ·        12% Cutting taxes
    ·        8% None of the above
    ·        7% Not sure
     
    5.      Which statement best reflects your view?
    ·        26% Congress needs to deal with the problem of America’s addiction to oil because it undermines our long-term economic future and causes pollution
    ·        13% Dealing with our energy problems will have to be delayed while Congress focuses on economic issues
    ·        50% Our oil addiction and long-term economic problems are related and Congress should deal with them together
    ·        10% Not sure
     
    6.      If Congress decides there is a need to invest more money to stimulate the economy to create jobs, what would you say is the best way to pay for it – by using revenue generated by making large companies pay for the global warming pollution they produce?
    ·        10% Increasing taxes
    ·        7% Borrowing more money through increasing government debt
    ·        66% Using revenue generated from large companies that pay for the pollution they create that leads to global warming
    ·        18% Not sure
     
    7.      Okay…Which of the following is most important to be near the top of the next president’s agenda in January?
    ·        25% New regulations for the financial services industry
    ·        40% Creating jobs by investing in renewable energy projects
    ·        19% Reviewing our national security strategy
    ·        16% Not sure
     
    8.      In your view, is it more important to limit the amount of regulation that is placed on business, or to work to implement new rules that make sure companies produce clean, renewable energy to promote environmental standards and energy independence?
    ·        25% Limit the amount of regulation that is placed on businesses
    ·        61% Implement new rules that make sure companies produce clean, renewable energy to promote environmental standards and energy independence
    ·        15% Not sure
     
    9.      Would you strongly favor, moderately favor, moderately oppose or strongly oppose a legislation to cut foreign oil imports and reduce environmental pollution?
    ·        39% Strongly favor
    ·        37% Moderately favor
    ·        9% Moderately oppose
    ·        7% Strongly oppose
    ·        8% Not sure
     
    10. Would you still support this legislation if it raised your home energy bill by $5 a month?
    ·        77% Yes, still support it
    ·        16% No, would oppose it
    ·        7% Not sure
     
    11. What if your energy bill increased by $10?
    ·        58% Yes, still support it
    ·        31% No, would oppose it
    ·        11% Not sure
  • EPA Must Propose A Science-Based Fuel Rule that Advances Innovation and Protects the Environment, Groups Say

    November 10, 2008

     

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    CONTACT: Aaron Huertas,
    Union of Concerned Scientists, 202-331-5458
     

    WASHINGTON (November 10, 2008) - The Environmental Protection Agency must accurately account for global warming emissions from biofuels when implementing the new renewable fuel standard, leading environmental and science groups said in a letter they sent today to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson.

     
    In last year’s energy bill, Congress explicitly required the EPA to accurately measure global warming emissions from renewable fuels based on their entire lifecycle, from cultivation to fuel production to vehicle exhaust. However, industry trade groups and others are pressuring EPA to omit or delay accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from land use change, such as tropical deforestation, tied to expanding biofuels production.
     
    Such indirect land use change is the ripple effect that results from using land currently used for food for fuel production. This may indirectly lead to decimated forests or tilled prairies for new farms to make up for lost food crops. Such land clearing, especially in tropical forests, releases large amounts of greenhouse gases.
     
    In their letter, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Environmental Working Group, Friends of the Earth, the National Wildlife Federation, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), underscore the importance of including and thoroughly documenting the impacts of indirect land use change in the draft rule.
     
    “There is no doubt that greenhouse gas emissions caused by land use change are substantial, and that those associated with renewable fuel production can easily make the difference between reducing or increasing  greenhouse gas emissions relative to gasoline,” the letter states. “Encouraging investments in high carbon technology based on intentionally distorted accounting is a dangerous detour for the biofuels industry and would clearly undermine the intent of Congress in establishing minimum greenhouse gas standards for biofuels.”
     
     
    The renewable fuel standard requires gasoline and diesel fuel suppliers to sell more biofuels over time. By 2022, they are required to sell 36 billion gallons, or about 10 percent of all transportation fuel use in that year.
     
    Biofuel producers must meet unique emissions reduction thresholds for each type of fuel to meet renewable fuel standard requirements. For instance, the standard requires that more than half of the biofuels must be advanced ethanol or cellulosic ethanol, which must reduce lifecycle global warming pollution by 50 and 60 percent, respectively. The EPA’s draft rule to implement the standard is likely to provide estimates of emissions from a range of biofuels, including corn ethanol, biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol.
     
    If the Bush administration pressures the EPA to ignore the science behind indirect land use change, it would be yet another example of ongoing political interference in science at the agency over the past several years, according to the UCS. (For more on past cases of interference, go to: www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/hundreds-of-epa-scientists-0112.html.)
     
    Conversely, if the EPA meets the requirements of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 and uses the best science to account for lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, the groups said the agency will help set the country on a path to innovation in truly clean renewable fuels.
     
    ###
     
    A leading national nonprofit organization, Environmental Defense Fund represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org
     
    The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, DC that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment.
     
    Friends of the Earth (www.foe.org) is the U.S. voice of the world’s largest grassroots environmental network, with member groups in 70 countries. Since 1969, Friends of the Earth has fought to create a more healthy, just world.
     
    The National Wildlife Federation is America’s largest conservation organization inspiring Americans to protect wildlife for our children’s future. For more information, go to www.nwf.org.
     
    The Natural Resources Defense Council is a national, nonprofit organization of scientists, lawyers and environmental specialists dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. Founded in 1970, NRDC has 1.2 million members and online activists, served from offices in New York, Washington, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Beijing. For more information, go to www.nrdc.org.
     
    The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading U.S. science-based nonprofit organization working for a healthy environment and a safer world. Founded in 1969, UCS is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and also has offices in Berkeley, Chicago and Washington, D.C. For more information, go to www.ucsusa.org.

     

  • Historic Quota Program Passed for West Coast Groundfish

    November 8, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Jennifer Witherspoon, EDF CA Communications Director, 415.378.1985 (mobile) or jwitherspoon@edf.org;

    Johanna Thomas, EDF Pacific Oceans Policy Director, 510.703.8484 (mobile) or jthomas@edf.org;

    (November 8, 2008: San Diego, CA) - The Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC), which governs West Coast fishing, approved late last night a groundbreaking plan to revitalize the multi-million dollar West Coast groundfish trawl fleet, after five years of planning and negotiation.

    “This is a watershed moment for West Coast fishing,” said Johanna Thomas Pacific Ocean Policy Director of Environmental Defense Fund. “Fishermen have struggled to make a living under ineffective regulations that weren’t working for the fish or the fishermen. Catch share programs have been proven to make fishing sustainable and to increase profits for fishermen, coastal communities and seafood processors alike.”

    The plan will create financial incentives that encourage fishermen to meet stringent performance standards. Called a catch share, also known as Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQ), it provides fishermen with a guaranteed percentage of the catch based on boat size and fishing history. Old management rules attempted to set a limit on the fishery as a whole through shortened seasons. The final decision on the groundfish catch share came after years of negotiations with communities and other stakeholders. The end result is an innovative new way to manage fisheries on the West Coast and a model for other fisheries around the country.

    Studies by EDF have shown that catch shares programs reduce bycatch by 40 percent. Bycatch is the unintentional capture of non-targeted species that is often tossed dead or dying overboard. It also fosters conservation and cooperation among fishermen. Competition for ever-dwindling fish is replaced by stewardship, where fishermen advise each other on which areas to fish or leave alone. At the same time, profits increase up to 80 percent per boat due to higher prices at the dock.

    The groundbreaking vote came late in the evening on Friday, following days of testimony from scores of fishermen and intense lobbying from large seafood processors who wanted allocations of the fishing privileges. Ultimately the Council decided to allocate 90 percent of the fishing shares directly to fishermen and to reserve 10 percent of the fishing rights for an “Adaptive Management” program to be used for communities to adjust to the new program. No fishing shares were allocated directly to seafood processors who had waged a major effort to gain a large percent of the fishing quota.

    The new IFQ program is considered critical for the recovery of the Pacific groundfish commercial trawl fishery, which was declared a “disaster” by the Secretary of Commerce in 2000 due to major declines in nine of 82 species of groundfish. Groundfish include soles and cod as well as deep-water “rockfish” like colorful canary and thorny heads – that are commonly marketed as red snapper. Landings for west coast trawlers had plummeted 70 percent in the last two decades. Revenues have dropped from $47.3 million to $22.2 million since 1998. Nearly all fish stocks around the world are declining or have collapsed. Studies recently published in the journals Nature and Science show that catch share systems reverse overfishing and even regrow depleted stocks. Catch shares also decrease wasteful discards and improve safety for fishermen. Catch share programs are presently used in parts of the U.S., Canada, New Zealand, and Iceland.

    With catch shares, fishermen know how much they can fish in a given year and can fish when prices and weather are best, thereby maximizing profits while fishing in a more careful, efficient, and sustainable way. With the certainty and time provided by catch shares, fishermen can greatly reduce haste and waste.

    Many positive precedents could be established once the IFQ is implemented, including a first-ever policy to allow fishermen to switch gear types to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts, and potentially allow them to deliver even higher quality harvests. In addition, the IFQ program would be one of a handful of fisheries in the U.S. with observers on every boat, which would improve scientific understanding of the health of the fishery. Once approved by the Department of Commerce, the plan will go into effect in 2011.

  • Prominent Environmental Group Condemns Further Cuts in Transit Funding Proposed by the Governor Today

    November 6, 2008

    For immediate Release      

    Contact:  Jesus Mena: c (415)-948-4220; jemena@edf.org
                                 Kathryn Phillips: c(916) 893-8494; kphillips@edf.org
     
    (Sacramento – November 6, 2008) – California’s mass transit system can be seriously damaged by the cuts in transit funding that Governor Schwarzenegger proposed today, said a spokesperson for Environmental Defense Fund.
     
    Governor Schwarzenegger proposed eliminating $230 million from local transit operations and capital costs associated with local mass transportation operations.
     
    “Public transit in most parts of California is on life support,” said Kathryn Phillips, Environmental Defense Fund transportation and air policy expert.  “It can’t tolerate yet more cuts in state funding and still meet fast-growing demand.”
     
    Phillips pointed out that this week Californians voted for various transit measures around the state despite the economic malaise because they understand the critical need for improved mass transit. Some of the propositions that were approved, such as Measure R in Los Angeles, required tax increases and a more than two-third majority for passage.  
     
    “Through their votes, California’s population made it clear where their priorities lie,” said Phillips. “The governor and legislature must find new dollars for transit and not cut existing funding. We can’t have a well-educated, healthy workforce if there isn’t a way to get to school, to work and to vital services. Mass transit decreases pollution and reduces traffic congestion. We need to invest in it at the level Californians demand.”
  • Green Group Disappointed with Judge's Injunction Blocking Green Taxi Rule

    October 31, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
     
    Contact:
    Isabelle Silverman, 917-445-6385-c, isilverman@edf.org
    Sean Crowley, 202-550-6524-c, scrowley@edf.org
     
    (New York – October 31, 2008) A preliminary injunction blocking a rule requiring New York City taxicabs to get a minimum 25 miles-per-gallon starting tomorrow is a mistake, according to Environmental Defense Fund.
     
    Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty ruled that a federal law designed to improve motor-vehicle efficiency, The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, “preempts” the city’s regulation. Crotty’s ruling came in response to a suit filed by some cab drivers and owners seeking to overturn the rule.
     
    “This decision is like comparing apples to oranges,” said Isabelle Silverman, a legal fellow for the Living Cities Program at Environmental Defense Fund. “The Taxi and Limousine Commission is not requiring auto manufacturers to raise their fuel efficiency standards, which is the role of federal law.  It’s just requiring cab drivers to buy fuel efficient vehicles that are already on the market.  It’s just smart city policy to reduce global warming and to address energy security issues that result from our heavy dependence on imported oil and its contribution to the country’s unsustainable trade deficit.”