Complete list of press releases

  • Ocean Conservationists Celebrate President Bush

    January 6, 2009

    (Washington – January 6, 2009) President George W. Bush will make marine conservation history today when he announces strong new protections for a vast area of the central Pacific Ocean that includes nine distinct tropical coral islands and their surrounding waters, ranging from Wake Island in the west to Palmyra Atoll in the east.  The three new protected areas will be called MarianasMarineNational Monument, PacificRemoteIslandNational Monument, and RoseAtollNational Monument.  In total, approximately 195,000 square miles will be protected, an area larger than California. Having established the first U.S. marine national monument in 2006 in the northwestern Hawaiian Islands, which comprises 139,797 square miles, President Bush has now protected more of the ocean than any other president.

    Marine Conservation Biology Institute (MCBI) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) have worked cooperatively with the Bush administration for over two years to nominate, justify and develop scientific and public support for two of the three areas and eight of the nine sites protected:  Wake, Howland, Baker, Palmyra, Kingman, Johnston, Jarvis and Rose Atoll.  The Pew Charitable Trusts worked to secure protection for large, important ocean areas off the Northern Mariana Islands.

    “Today’s announcement marks an enormous step in conserving the biodiversity of our planet. These new marine monuments rank right up there with our nation’s greatest national parks,” said David Yarnold, executive director of Environmental Defense Fund.  Yarnold added that the executive decision was based on findings by over 200 leading scientists from EDF and other organizations that the islands and their surrounding ocean waters must be protected because they are some of the few remaining, relatively pristine islands left on Earth.  “We are gratified that the president has given careful consideration to the scientific evidence and our recommendations to protect these areas.”

    Elliott A. Norse, President of Marine Conservation Biology Institute, echoes these feelings: “To the President and First Lady, to my colleagues in the scientific community, to the fishes of the Pacific and to all Americans who care about our oceans, I offer congratulations.  President Bush has now protected more ocean sites than anyone else in the history of the world,” said Dr. Norse.  “We greatly appreciate this bold, visionary action.”

    “President Bush has laid the foundation for a national system of ocean reserves just as Theodore Roosevelt laid the foundation for our national park system,” said MCBI vice president for government affairs, William Chandler.  “The islands will be havens for all kinds of marine life, and a bulwark against the degradation and decline of the tropical Pacific,” Chandler predicted.

    “President Bush is giving the world a Texas-sized gift,” said Diane Regas, associate vice-president for oceans at Environmental Defense Fund. “These are places time forgot.  They still look as they did hundreds and even thousands of years ago.”

    Contacts: 

    Dr. Elliott Norse, president MCBI, cell 425-985-6355;

    Bill Chandler, vice-president government affairs MCBI, cell 703-851-9931; office 202-546-5346

    Diane Regas, associate vice-president, Oceans program, EDF, cell 202-607-4657

     

    To access video and photographs, please visit www.thenewsmarket.com/edfMedia can access standard definition and high definition broadcast quality video for editorial use, free of charge.

    ###

    Marine Conservation Biology Institute is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing the science of marine conservation biology and securing protection for ocean ecosystems.

    Environmental Defense Fund is a leading national nonprofit organization, which represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org

     

  • Federal, California Regulators Urged to Deny Industry Petition to Delay or Reverse California Off-Road Diesel Rule

    January 5, 2009

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Janea Scott, 917-674-0513-c, jscott@edf.org 
    Sean Crowley, 202-572-3331, scrowley@edf.org
     
    (Los Angeles - January 5, 2008) Federal and state regulators should deny an industry petition to delay or reverse a California rule to clean up off-road diesel vehicles, including construction vehicles, said a senior attorney for Environmental Defense Fund today.
     
    The comments came during an 11:00 a.m. news conference at the Los Angeles County Puente Hills Landfill to demonstrate off-road diesel vehicle retrofits funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Air Resources Board (CARB). The news conference also included EPA Regional Administrator Wayne Nastri, CARB Chair Mary Nichols and South Coast Air District Executive Officer Barry Wallerstein.
     
    “Timely and efficient execution of the off-road rule is critical to the state meeting its clean air requirements and to saving and improving thousands of lives of California residents and workers on job sites,” said Janea Scott, a senior attorney for Environmental Defense Fund based in Los Angeles.  “We are encouraged by the progress companies are making so far to implement this rule. We hope that businesses, government agencies, environmental and health groups continue their partnership to ensure safe and effective implementation of the off-road rule.”
     
    Cleaning up these diesel vehicles has huge environmental and economical benefits, contrary to claims by the largest and oldest national construction trade association in the United States — the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC of America) — and its two California chapters, in their Dec. 15 petition to CARB to reconsider or repeal the rule. The AGC of America and its two California chapters also asked EPA on Dec. 22 to defer or deny California’s pending request for approval to implement the rule. CARB is scheduled to hold a hearing on January 22 to review updates on the off-road rule, which will include a report on the status of retrofit technology. 
     
    CARB crafted the off-road rule with input from the construction industry to minimize the cost of implementation. It would phase in over 15 years, ensuring a steady decline in pollution from construction equipment, with the cost of the regulation representing only 0.3 percent of the total annual construction revenue generated in California in 2005. CARB estimates that the entire industry will have to spend between $3 billion and $3.4 billion over the full 15-year period to comply with the proposed rule compared to the $18 billion to $26 billion it is expected to save in prevented health care costs.
     
    “The pollution from construction and other off-road equipment represents the second largest source of toxic diesel pollution in the state,” concluded Scott.  “Contrary to construction industry’s claims, technology is available today to effectively reduce this pollution and has been demonstrated to also ensure safe operation of the vehicle.”
     
    CARB’s programs are providing incentives for new, green jobs in the retrofit installation and manufacturing business, according to EPA, despite the currently weak economy. Many of the retrofit companies are based in California and are providing job opportunities for next-generation mechanics, who will clean, repair, and install the retrofit devices and new vehicle technologies.  One example is San Leandro-based Cleaire, which manufactures its active particulate matter (PM) pollution filter for off-road vehicles. 
     
    According to EPA and CARB:
     
    •Toxic pollutants from off-road vehicles — largely construction equipment — were responsible for 1,100 premature deaths in California in 2005. 
    •The off-road rule is expected to prevent 4,000 premature deaths in the state.
    •Off-road vehicles are responsible for more than 1/4 of all mobile source nitrogen oxide emissions and almost 40 percent of all mobile source diesel PM emissions.
    •The regulation is expected to reduce toxic diesel PM emissions 37 percent from the 2000 baseline by 2010 and 92 percent by 2020; and reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide emissions 13 percent by 2015 and 32 percent by 2020.
     

  • Court Reinstates Clean Air Interstate Rule

    December 23, 2008

    (Tuesday, December 23, 2008) In a major decision benefiting clean air and public health, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today issued an order that leaves the Clean Air Interstate Rule in effect while the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency develops a new clean air program for power plants. 

    “Today’s court decision is a welcome gift for the millions of American’s that face serious health threats from power plant pollution. Power plants across the East will reduce millions of tons of smog and soot pollution today while America’s new leadership fixes the mistakes made by the Bush Administration,” said Vickie Patton, deputy general counsel at Environmental Defense Fund.
     
    Granting aspects of rehearing requests from the Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Defense Fund and Natural Resources Defense Council, the court found that the rule is an “integral action” and stated:  
     
    “Here, we are convinced that, notwithstanding the relative flaws of CAIR, allowing CAIR to remain in effect until it is replaced by a rule consistent with our opinion would at least temporarily preserve the environmental values covered by CAIR.”  
     
    Judge Judith Rogers wrote a separate concurrence stating that CAIR is “so intertwined” with the nation’s air quality management regulatory framework that “its vacatur would sacrifice clean benefits to public health and the environment while EPA fixes the rule.” 
     
    The timing of this decision is critical.   January 1, 2009 is the first important compliance deadline under EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule — requiring substantial reductions in year-round emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) to protect human health from this damaging pollutant.   The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Defense Fund, and numerous states asked the court to reconsider its July 11th opinion to vacate this clean air program.    The program was designed to reduce millions of tons of smog- and particulate-forming pollution from coal-fired power plants in 28 eastern states.  
     
    EPA estimated the rule would prevent 17,000 deaths annually by 2015.   The pollution cuts required by the Clean Air Interstate Rule were to be implemented in two phases beginning on January 1, 2009 for NOx and 2010 for sulfur dioxide (SO2), and a second phase in 2015 for both contaminants.   EPA estimated that NOx would be reduced 2 million tons annually under full program implementation, about 60% over today’s levels.   The program was designed to cut SO2 emissions by 5.4 million tons in 2015.  
  • Ocean Energy Agenda Supported by Coastal Mayors, Industrial Leaders, Academics and Environmentalists

    December 22, 2008

     

    (Washington, DC-December 18th) Ocean energy has the potential to create tens of thousands of jobs in the United States and generate as much as 10 percent of the nation’s demand for electricity, the equivalent of all hydroelectric energy in the U.S. today. This good news comes from a growing and diverse coalition who recently presented a roadmap for harnessing the power of the ocean to transition teams from the incoming Obama administration. The document details how to fix the confusing and sometimes contradictory - array of federal regulations that now govern the industry.  

     

    “In San Francisco, we are aggressively advancing tidal and wave power pilot projects,” said Mayor Gavin Newsom. “As we begin to shape our country’s new green energy future, it is important that we look to the ocean. The ocean is a great untapped resource that has the potential to create thousands of new jobs, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and improve our environment.”

    Ocean energy includes a variety of technologies that convert waves, tides, and currents into electrical power.  Moving water is at least 700 times as dense as wind blowing at the same speed. There are currently only a handlful of ocean energy projects in U.S. waters. All are in the testing phase.   

    “Ocean energy should be a part of a blue-green future for American energy needs,” said Diane Regas, associate vice president of Environmental Defense Fund“These technologies can help solve global warming, and we can build in protection for healthy oceans from the start.  The key is to test these projects quickly at a small scale, and to use the resulting data with the public to make sure that the technologies meet strong environmental standards. ”

     

    A delegation organized by Environmental Defense Fund met on Tuesday with transition team members from Department of Energy, Department of Interior, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to present the groups’ recommendations.

     

    The coalition was convened earlier this year by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) to begin a dialogue on ocean energy among industry leaders and conservationists. Early participants included Florida Power and Light (FPL), Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE), and the Surfrider Foundation, and the coalition has continued to grow over the last nine months. 

     

    “This issue brings together key three priorities of the incoming administration: climate change, creating new green jobs and reasserting U.S. leadership on science and technology. Based on both the selection of President-elect Obama’s ‘Green Team’ and the attention we received from the transition teams today, we believe we will see strong action on these issues,” said Jack Sterne of Rising Tide Strategies, the organizer for the group. “We think it’s important to learn from the experience of the wind and solar companies who went overseas when they did not receive adequate leadership from this country.”

     

    To read the recommendations click here.

     

    Supporters of the Action Framework for Ocean Energy

     

    Local Governments

    Bill Baarsma, Mayor, Tacoma, WA

    Mark Begich, Mayor, Anchorage, AK

    Marty Blum, Mayor, Santa Barbara, CA

    Keith Bohr, Mayor, Huntington Beach, CA

    Gavin Newsom, Mayor, San Francisco, CA

    Tom Potter, Mayor, Portland, OR 

    Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism

     

    Utilities

    Central Lincoln People’s Utility District

    Florida Power & Light

    Hawaiian Electric Company

    Pacific Gas & Electric

    Portland General Electric

     

    Private Sector

    Caithness Development, LLC

    Free Flow Power

    Global Energy Horizons, Inc.

    Independent Natural Resources, Inc.

    Ocean Power Technologies

    Ocean Renewable Power Company LLC

    Oceana Energy Company

    Oceanlinx LLC

    Pacific Energy Ventures LLC

    Renewable Energy Holdings PLC

    Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal LLP

    WaveBob LLC

     

    Non-Governmental Organizations

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Hydropower Reform Coalition

    Natural Heritage Institute

    National Hydropower Association

    Natural Resources Defense Council

    Ocean Champions

    Oregon Wave Energy Trust

    Surfrider Foundation

     

    Academic Institutions

    New England Marine Renewable Energy Center

    Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center

    Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center

    University of Hawaii at Manoa

     

    Contacts:

    Katharine Burnham, EDF (202) 415-5742; kburnham@edf.org

    Jack Sterne, Rising Tides Strategies (907) 351-4294; jacksterne@mac.com

     

     

    ###

     

     

  • Secretary of Transportation Nominee Urged to Adopt Green Transportation Agenda

    December 19, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:

    Dan Cronin, 202-572-3354, dcronin@edf.org

    (Washington - December 19, 2008) Environmental Defense Fund’s Transportation Director Michael Replogle, an advisor to the U.S. Department of Transportation and a former consultant to the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and the World Bank, issued the following statement about President-elect Obama’s nomination of retiring Republican Illinois Congressman Ray LaHood to be Secretary of Transportation:

    “We urge Secretary-designate LaHood to lead the Obama Administration’s efforts to adopt new transportation policies to help solve the critical economic, climate and environmental problems facing our country. It is vital that the economic recovery package and the next transportation bill focus investment on expanding low-carbon transportation options, repairing existing infrastructure, and improving freight and passenger transportation system performance.

    “Secretary-designate LaHood has an opportunity to shape transportation policy for a generation in a way that cuts traffic, global warming and toxic pollution, and helps us achieve energy independence.  We hope Secretary-designate LaHood will work closely with Obama’s strong environmental team of Carol Browner, Steven Chu, and Lisa Jackson. We look forward to working with Secretary-designate LaHood to make these important changes a reality.”
     

  • Environmental Defense Fund Honored that Board Vice Chair Reportedly Picked as NOAA Administrator

    December 19, 2008
    (Washington, D.C. - December 19, 2008) Environmental Defense Fund is honored that President-elect Barack Obama has selected EDF Board Vice Chair Jane Lubchenco to head the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), according to several sources contacted by The Washington Post.

    “Dr. Lubchenco is the perfect person to run NOAA because of her tireless work to protect our oceans, and her depth of understanding of climate change is unmatched,” said Environmental Defense Fund President Fred Krupp.  “She has dedicated her professional life to promoting science and policies that demonstrate the connections between healthy ecosystems and jobs, food, climate stability and a vibrant economy.  President-elect Obama could not have found a more inspirational or prepared leader for NOAA.”

    NOAA’s budget is more than $4 billion and has a presence in every state in the country.  Its responsibilities include creating sustainable fisheries, weather and climate forecasting, and protecting and restoring ocean ecosystems.  NOAA will have a central role in addressing pressing challenges of our time: stabilizing the climate, restoring science in decision-making and saving life in the oceans.

    Dr. Lubchenco is a preeminent ocean and climate scientist and a former head of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, one of the world’s most prestigious scientific organizations.

    “I have been fortunate enough to work closely with Dr. Lubchenco since 1995, when she became a board member for Environmental Defense Fund,” added Krupp.  “During her time on our board, she has been a strong, guiding voice to ensure that our scientific analysis was rigorous and our policies were effective in creating best-in-class solutions to our most serious environmental problems.

    “As never before, our country and our planet need scientists and leaders like Jane Lubchenco,” concluded Krupp.  “We will miss her, but we are honored and thrilled President-elect Obama has chosen for this new position.”
  • Environmental Groups Point the Way to Mercury Pollution Reductions

    December 18, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    December 18, 2008
     
    CONTACTS
    Ann B. Weeks, Clean Air Task Force (617) 359-4077
    John Surrick, Chesapeake Bay Foundation (443) 482-2045
    Jim Pew/Kathleen Sutcliffe, Earthjustice (202) 667-4500
    Sean Crowley, Environmental Defense Fund (202) 572-3331
    John Walke, Natural Resources Defense Council (202) 289-2406
    Virginia Cramer, Sierra Club (804)225-9113, ext. 102
    John Suttles/Kathleen Sullivan, Southern Environmental Law Center (919) 967-1450
    Scott Edwards, Waterkeeper Alliance (914) 674-0622, ext. 13

    Washington, DC – Today, a coalition of public health and environmental groups filed a lawsuit  in federal court here, seeking a firm and enforceable new deadline for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to require deep reductions in mercury and other toxic air pollutants emitted from coal- and oil-fired power plants. Power plants are the nation’s largest unregulated source of mercury pollution, and also emit enormous quantities of lead, arsenic and other hazardous chemicals. If successful, the lawsuit would end six years of delay by the Bush administration.
     
    Attorneys at Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF), Clean Air Task Force, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council, Southern Environmental Law Center, and Waterkeeper Alliance filed the lawsuit today in DC District Court on behalf of American Nurses Association, CBF, Conservation Law Foundation, Environment America, Environmental Defense Fund, Izaak Walton League of America, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Ohio Environmental Council, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Sierra Club, and Waterkeeper Alliance.
     
    Today’s lawsuit follows President-elect Barack Obama’s appointment of Lisa Jackson to head the agency. Groups expressed hope that the incoming administration will take a new approach to regulating pollution from power plants and act quickly to bring the problem under control.
     
    “We are far past both the legal and, indeed, the moral deadline for EPA to take action to control toxic air emissions from this enormous industrial source of mercury and other poisons,” said Clean Air Task Force attorney Ann B. Weeks. “At the same time we are hopeful that the Obama administration will act quickly to mandate the deep cuts in this pollution, as the Clean Air Act requires.”
     
    According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, eight percent of American women of childbearing age have mercury in their bodies at levels high enough to put their babies at risk of birth defects, loss of IQ, learning disabilities and developmental problems.
     
    “Children and women of childbearing age are at risk when power plants emit the levels of mercury they are emitting today – all 50 states, and one US territory, have declared fish advisories warning about mercury contamination,” John Suttles, senior attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center. “It is time to require deep reductions from this industry.”
     
    Under the Clean Air Act, EPA was required to control power plants’ emissions by December, 2002.  Instead of meeting that requirement, however, the Bush administration asked Congress to roll back the control requirements. Then, unable to win Congress’ support for that request, the administration unlawfully tried to declare that the required pollution controls were simply not necessary or appropriate.
     
    “Power plants are the largest unregulated industrial source of air toxics,” said Earthjustice attorney Jim Pew. “It is unconscionable that six years after the deadline for action, we still do not have air toxics controls on these large existing sources of pollution.”
     
    The federal appeals court in D.C. tossed out EPA’s attempt in February 2008, in a lawsuit brought by a coalition of environmental and public health groups, states and Native American tribes. Baffled by the Bush administration’s reasons as to why it should not set these requirements, the Court compared its logic to that of the dangerously irrational Queen of Hearts character in Alice in Wonderland.  Now EPA is back where it started: in violation of the 2002 statutory deadline to control power plants’ toxic pollution.
     
    “EPA’s failure to protect our children’s health from toxic mercury pollution has allowed coal plants to release more than 700,000 pounds of mercury pollution over the past eight years. The era of deny and delay in failing to protect America’s children from toxic air pollution is coming to a close,” said Vickie Patton, deputy general counsel at Environmental Defense Fund. “We look forward to working with new leadership for America that will follow the science and enforce the law to protect our children and our communities from toxic air pollution.”
     
    In the intervening 10 months since the court ruling, EPA has made no moves to comply with the court’s order, prompting today’s lawsuit.
     
    “With the devastating impacts mercury is having on our waterways, fish, women and children in the US,  EPA’s failure to pass a mercury control rule that safeguards both human and environmental health is perhaps the most damning example of an agency blind to its mission and mandate,” stated Waterkeeper Alliance Legal Director Scott Edwards. “Sadly, once again, the Bush administration has accomplished what the energy industry hired it to do eight years ago – protect their profits, promote their interests and avoid any accountability.”
     
    Approximately 1,100 coal-fired units at more than 450 existing power plants spew some 96,000 pounds of mercury into the air each year. 
     
    “There are affordable technologies widely available today that can substantially reduce mercury and other toxic pollution from coal-fired power plants,” said Bruce Nilles, director of the Sierra Club’s National Coal Campaign. “By turning a blind eye to these technologies the EPA is unnecessarily putting the health of children everywhere at risk.”
     
    Much of the mercury and other metals in the air toxics plume fall out within 100 miles of the power plant source, and mercury accumulates up the food chain in fish and in the animals that consume it.  In addition to human health effects, significant adverse effects on wildlife also have been linked to power plant mercury.
     
    “Studies have clearly demonstrated that a significant amount of mercury pollution from power plants falls locally, and almost all waterways in Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania have fish consumption advisories due to mercury,” said Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Director of Litigation Jon Mueller. “While some states have taken action to reduce mercury pollution others have not, underscoring the need for national standards.”
     
    “The Bush EPA will leave behind a mercury pollution legacy of shame and irresponsible delay,” said John Walke, senior attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council. “After eight years, all they managed was to break the law and fail to clean up power plants’ rising toxic emissions.”
     
    A copy of the complaint filed today in DC district court is available here:
    http://www.earthjustice.org/library/legal_docs/power-plant-pollution-dec-08-complaint.pdf

  • Business, Green Agendas Align Resulting in Environmental Benefits and Significant Cost Savings

    December 18, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Thomas Glenn, Environmental Defense Fund, 713.942.5815-w
    Media Contact: Susan Elmore, Crescent Real Estate, 713-524-0661, susan@elmorepr.com
    Chris Smith, Environmental Defense Fund, 512.691.3451-w or 512.659.9264-c or csmith@edf.org
     
    (Houston – December 18, 2008) Collaboration between Environmental Defense Fund’s (EDF) Climate Corps program and Houston Center, a downtown office complex owned by affiliates of Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, makes a strong business case for real estate management companies to increase their focus on the cost savings potential of energy efficiency.
     
    Earlier this year, a Climate Corps Fellow from EDF worked with Crescent’s Houston Center staff over a 10-week period to help identify cost-effective upgrades to lighting, office equipment and HVAC systems to ultimately reduce electricity use by 11 percent at a Houston Center office tower. 
     
    “Our Climate Corps Fellow, Tyler Monzel, brought significant resources to our team. His knowledge, passion and expertise helped us more quickly identify and summarize opportunities for significant savings,” states Frank Staats, vice president of Property Management Houston Center. Affiliates of Crescent own and manage almost 4 million square feet of office and retail space at Houston Center.
     
    Working with Crescent personnel, the EDF fellow helped identify a number of immediate energy efficiency investments at 2 Houston Center, including investments in lighting, office equipment and heating/cooling/ventilation systems that could cut electricity use by more than 2.5 million kWh/year, saving Crescent and its tenants $400,000 annually and reducing CO2 emissions (the gas scientists say is the primary cause of global warming) by more than 1,300 tons/year. Each of these projects would recoup costs through energy savings in less than five years – some in as little as six months.
     
    A longer-term plan was developed by which Crescent could cut overall electricity usage at Houston Center by 20 percent over the next 10 years, eventually saving the company more than $700,000/year. While cost savings are top business priorities, environmentalists also tout the clean air and energy benefits.
     
    “Commercial buildings make up almost 17 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions from electricity use in the United States,” said Thomas Glenn, EDF clean energy policy specialist. “Our partnership with Crescent proves that businesses can save money while acting to solve global warming.”
     
    Nationwide Crescent operates 16 buildings with Energy Star Ratings, and Crescent is an active member of the US Green Building Council. Crescent has a tradition of innovative and creative approaches to conducting business.  Additionally, Crescent prides itself on being a good corporate steward to the environment and a responsible business partner to its customers.  In keeping with these core business philosophies, Crescent has undertaken numerous initiatives designed to allow Crescent and its customers to reduce electricity consumption, prevent waste by recycling and remove greenhouses gases from the environment.
     
    In 2007, 4 Houston Center had an Energy Star Award rating of 93 percent, which is in the top 25 percent of buildings in the nation for energy performance. Houston Center recycled 155.4 tons of paper and cardboard and 36 percent of the total waste from the complex in 2007. Further, water conservation resulted in a reduction of over 1 million gallons in 2007.


     

  • Fundamental Fairness: Joint Statement to the MTA Board

    December 17, 2008

    Our buses, subways and rails are the lifeblood of this region.  Vital to our economy, our environment and our quality of life, this transit network moves more than nine million workers, customers, tourists and students each workday.  The MTA is in crisis but clearly the budget being voted on today must not stand.  If it does, the results threaten to propel our city and our region into an economic, social and environmental tailspin.  Now is the time for leadership that recognizes the enormity of our problem and inspires us all to be part of the solution to this crisis.
     
    We applaud the Governor’s Commission on MTA Financing for their recommendations, which continue a 30-year tradition of asking those who benefit, whether directly or indirectly from our transit system, to contribute to the maintenance of this vital network.
     
    The Commission’s recommendations are marked by a fundamental fairness:
     
    • All riders, commuters, drivers and businesses will contribute to the support of the region’s transit system, including the repair and maintenance of bridges and roads. 
    • The recommendations eliminate the fundamental unfairness of sharply raising transit fares and some tolls while allowing other drivers to not pay any tolls. 
    • The recommendations reduce the pressure to raise tolls even more at currently-tolled bridges and tunnels. 
    • Motorists will take on the burden of maintaining the bridges that they use, as part of the revenue from new tolls will be dedicated to bridge repair and maintenance.
     
    We, the organizations that stand here today, support these fundamentally fair recommendations presented by the Governor’s Commission on MTA Financing. 
     
    We acknowledge that it is a difficult choice for elected officials to approve and implement any changes that will spread the burden of helping to fund our transit system to some who benefit from our region’s transit network and are not accustomed to contributing.  But, we ask our leaders to consider the stark unfairness of placing a disproportionate burden on only some of the millions who benefit from our transit system, as well as the nightmare scenario of a transit network whose services and maintenance are drastically reduced due to a lack of support.
     
     
    Campaign for New York’s Future
    Citizens Committee for New York City
    Environmental Defense Fund
    General Contractors Association of New York
    LDC of West Bronx
    Natural Resources Defense Council
    New York City Apollo Alliance
    New York League of Conservation Voters
    New YorkState Laborers
    PrattCenter for Community Development
    Regional Plan Association
    Straphangers Campaign
    Time2Improve Municipal Efficiency
    Transportation Alternatives
    Tri-State Transportation Campaign
    Urban Agenda
    Women’s City Club of New York

  • EDF Praises Choice of Vilsack as Secretary of Agriculture

    December 17, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Sharyn Stein, 202-572-3396, sstein@edf.org
     
    Washington, D.C. – December 17, 2008 – Former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack is a solid choice for America’s next Secretary of Agriculture, according to Environmental Defense Fund.
     
    “Governor Vilsack recognizes that farmers, ranchers and forest landowners have an important role to play in combating climate change,” said Robert Bonnie, Vice President of Land, Water and Wildlife for Environmental Defense Fund. “He is a strong supporter of a cap and trade program for greenhouse gases, carbon offsets, and other measures to help stop global warming. We think he’ll be a great addition to the Obama Administration’s environmental team.”
     
    Environmental Defense Fund also praised Vilsack for his devotion to environmentally beneficial farm policy programs.
     
    “Governor Vilsack has a long history of supporting voluntary conservation programs focused on working agricultural lands, and he has advocated for sensible farm policy reforms.” said Sara Hopper, Agricultural Policy Director for Environmental Defense Fund. “He understands the importance of cooperating with private landowners to ensure that we address our most pressing environmental challenges.”
     
    ###
     
    Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org.
  • Statement in Support of Ken Salazar

    December 17, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Dan Grossman, EDF, dgrossman@edf.org or (303) 887-8206 (cell)
     
     
     
    “Ken Salazar has been a strong leader in protecting Colorado’s people, land, water and wildlife in his distinguished public service as a United States Senator, as Colorado’s Attorney General, and as head of Colorado’s Department of Natural Resources. In Colorado, we have long depended on Ken Salazar’s tested leadership and his steadfast commitment to unite rather than divide. Ken Salazar will bring the nation together in forging stewardship of our public lands, water and wildlife through integrity and through his abiding dedication to this cherished American legacy.”
  • California Green Chemistry Initiative Final Report Praised by Scientific Adviser

    December 16, 2008

     
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact: 

    Jennifer Witherspoon, (415) 293-6067, jwitherspoon@edf.org

     

    (Sacramento – December 16, 2008) The Final Report of the California Green Chemistry Initiative today was praised by one of the initiative’s scientific advisers for providing six key recommendations for advancing chemicals policy reform and the development of a safer, more sustainable chemicals economy in the state.

     

    “This report usefully recommends a number of the key building blocks that can move us toward the kind of fundamental reform we need in how we design, make, use and manage chemicals across their lifecycles,” said Dr. Richard Denison, Environmental Defense Fund senior scientist and a member of the Green Chemistry Initiative’s Science Advisory Panel. “While many critical aspects remain to be worked out through implementation, the report provides much of the needed framework.”

     

    In particular, Denison applauded several key provisions aimed at increasing the amount of information about chemicals accessible to the public and the marketplace, including:

     

    • A requirement that manufacturers disclose the chemical ingredients, including nanomaterials, present in their products through a publicly accessible online data network.

    • Development of a toxics clearinghouse intended both to compile existing information and to serve as a basis for identifying key data gaps on chemicals of concern for which data need to be generated.

    • Establishment of agreements with other governments to gain access to chemical information they possess.

    • Development of a framework and practical tools that can be used to expeditiously assess and spur the adoption of alternatives to chemicals of concern, with an emphasis on avoiding overly cumbersome and data-intensive analyses that could impede prompt action to address chemicals of concern.

     

  • EDF Applauds Obama Appointments for Top Environment Posts

    December 15, 2008

    Contact:          
    Tony Kreindler, Environmental Defense Fund, (202) 445-8108 or
    tkreindler@edf.org 

    “This new position reflects a deep commitment to leadership on climate change, and Carol Browner brings the perfect combination of experience and drive to the job. She understands that solving climate change will help rebuild our economy,” said Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense Fund.

     

    EDF looks forward to working with Ms. Browner and the new administration to fulfill President-elect Obama’s commitment to write a new chapter in U.S. history on climate change, one that starts with a federal cap and trade system and creates millions of new jobs for American workers.

     

    President-elect Obama today also named an all-star team to head the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, and the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

     

    “Obama has picked an impressive team of experienced, accomplished, and highly regarded experts to lead the U.S. into a new era of action on climate change,” Krupp said. “This team is a new partnership for the environment in the federal government, one that can work with Congress to make quick progress on global warming.”

     

    The nominations announced today include Nobel laureate Steven Chu for energy secretary, former New Jersey environment chief Lisa Jackson to serve as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and Los Angeles Deputy Mayor Nancy Sutley to chair the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

     

  • Joint Statement on the Importance of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries

    December 12, 2008

     

     

    History will judge our generation on whether it took the necessary steps to deal with the threat of climate change. We therefore wish to underline – during the fourteenth Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), in Poznan in December 2008 – our shared views on the importance of advancing these negotiations, and in particular on action to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in developing countries; and on the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks.

    Consistent with the advice of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), we recognise the need for deep cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases so as to stabilize the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration at the level that would avoid dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, as set out in Article 2, the ultimate objective of the UNFCCC. It is our vision that REDD will be part of the outcome to be agreed in Copenhagen in 2009 with ambitious cuts in developed countries’ emissions and appropriate actions by developing countries.

    We underline our countries’ commitment to the Bali Action Plan of the UNFCCC and the paramount importance of reaching a comprehensive and effective outcome at the fifteenth Conference of Parties in Copenhagen in December 2009. We recognize that, whilst all countries need to contribute to this on the basis of the principle of common but differentiated responsibility and respective capabilities set forth in the UNFCCC, the availability of adequate, predictable and sustainable resources to developing countries from all sources will be an essential element.

    Tropical forests are disappearing at an alarming rate every year. IPCC’s assessment indicates that land-use change and forestry, including deforestation, is responsible for some 17% of greenhouse gas emissions. We must act with speed and determination. Our governments will therefore work together to:

    ·        undertake early action on REDD; and

    ·        ensure the inclusion of REDD as part of the outcome agreed in Copenhagen.

    Our efforts will be within the framework set by the UNFCCC negotiations, and carefully designed to support these negotiations. They will be based on the following principles:

    ·        National REDD strategies, ownership and commitment to REDD in developing countries are preconditions for success, and should constitute the cornerstone of our efforts. These strategies should be designed and implemented in a transparent and equitable manner, with the participation of the relevant stakeholders including indigenous peoples, other civil society groups and the private sector. National strategies should provide for, inter alia, design and establishment of systems for measurement, reporting and verification, analysis of the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, estimation of costs of mitigation, sustainable development needs, conservation of biodiversity, other co-benefits, and the building of essential capacities and how benefits are distributed amongst beneficiaries. Action on conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries should contribute to achieving REDD.

    ·        Transparent, collaborative, balanced and inclusive international arrangements for supporting REDD efforts should be developed. International support for countries wanting to embark on REDD efforts should be as collaborative and effective as possible. There should be close cooperation to simplify and rationalize interaction between host countries, donors, international agencies including the World Bank and the UN REDD programme, and other relevant stakeholders. There should also be consistent, coordinated efforts by both REDD and donor countries to work closely together, through appropriate multilateral and bilateral channels.

    ·        Financial flows to support REDD efforts must be adequate, predictable and sustainable, and results based, with developed countries contributing significantly. REDD readiness activities and general capacity building are already being financed substantially by developed countries. Also, the donor countries among us stand ready to assist those REDD countries that can quickly move on to demonstrating results in a measurable and verifiable manner. REDD as part of a future negotiated outcome should enable mobilization of financial resources and their distribution to developing countries that are willing and able – in a measurable, reportable and verifiable manner - to take additional actions that reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation or conserve or enhance forest carbon stocks.

    ·         A reliable framework for measuring, reporting and verification is crucial to the integrity and credibility of REDD efforts in general and REDD in the outcome agreed in Copenhagen in particular. The establishment of national systems, open to independent verification, is a priority.

    Achieving an ambitious outcome in Copenhagen, including REDD as an important pillar, is essential. We invite all committed countries to join us, in our early efforts, and in our work to secure REDD’s place in the agreement in 2009.

     

     

  • EDF Welcomes New Global Climate Leaders as Poznan Talks End

    December 12, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     
    Contact:
    Andrea Welsh, 202-572-3232 or 202-297-7723 (cell), awelsh@edf.org
     
    (Poznan, Poland, Dec. 12, 2008)—Environmental Defense Fund praised developing nations for building momentum to stop global warming at the U.N. climate talks that headed for a conclusion here today, calling some emerging economies “new global leaders on climate change.”
     
    “Developing nations have just raised the bar for action,” said Jennifer Haverkamp, EDF’s director for international climate policy. “They’re fed up with the waiting game; Brazil, Mexico, South Africa and Peru, to name some, have stepped up to the plate with proposals to lower their national emissions.”
     
    EDF also applauded President-elect Barack Obama who, just days before negotiations started, pledged to lead the United States to engage in global climate talks and to move toward capping its own greenhouse gas emissions.
     
    “We leave here with real momentum after that one-two punch, first the signal from Obama and then these developing country proposals,” said Annie Petsonk, EDF international counsel. “Obama asked for reports from Poznan, and we had more than 40 congressional staff here. That’s exactly the kind of engagement we need from the U.S. Congress.”
     
    Steve Schwartzman, EDF’s director for tropical forest policy, added: “The deforestation issue is where developing and developed countries are coming together, even though negotiators barely managed to break the stalemate on technical details. We got a strong joint statement from 20 tropical and developed country ministers calling for early action to stop forest clearing, and Brazil committed to reduce its deforestation 70% in ten years.”
     
    However, EDF said the overall results of the Poznan talks were “merely adequate” and called on world leaders to work harder to reach a shared agreement to stop global warming before temperatures rise 2ºC.
     
    “We got the bare minimum of what we needed from the talks,” said Haverkamp. “We got a clear mandate and a timetable to move forward, but there’s a lot to do and less than a year to do it. The wait-and-see game must end.”
     
    Petsonk added: “It’s time for the White House and Congress to take swift action on national legislation to cap U.S. emissions. The world is watching.”
     
    At the global level, EDF called on world leaders to push hard to reach agreement at the Copenhagen climate talks in 2009.
     
    “We’ve got momentum, we’ve got concrete proposals, and we’ve got new leadership in Washington. There’s a mountain of work between now and next December but it is eminently doable,” Haverkamp said.