Complete list of press releases

  • Report Confirms Air Pollution From Large Animal Farms

    July 25, 2002

    (25 July 2002 — Raleigh) Environmental Defense today said a report released by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) makes it clear that atmospheric emissions from industrial livestock production are a serious environmental and public health concern.  The group called on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take swift action to protect the public from factory farm pollution.  The Scientific Basis for Estimating Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations, an interim report released by the NAS Committee on Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations, identifies emissions of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, methane, particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and odor as significant contributors to air pollution.

    “This report sends a clear message to the EPA and U.S. Department of Agriculture that new regulations, due in December 2002, must control atmospheric emissions from large animal feeding operations,” said Joe Rudek, senior scientist with Environmental Defense, who reviewed the report for NAS.  “The report points out that ignoring air pollution generated by industrial farms and simply focusing regulatory efforts on controlling land application of manure will lead to poorer air quality, impair water quality and threaten public health.”

    The interim report found flaws in earlier EPA analysis of atmospheric emissions from animal feeding operations and promised to provide guidance on improving forecasting tools in its final report, due in October 2002.  “This new study must be used to shape strong regulations to protect public health and the environment,” said Rudek.  “The science is clear, factory farms are polluting the air we breathe and the water we drink.  The time to protect the public is now.”

  • Environmental Defense Calls For Phase Out Of Hog Lagoons

    July 24, 2002

    (24 July 2002-Raleigh)  North Carolina Environmental Defense today called for Gov. Mike Easley, Attorney General Roy Cooper and the General Assembly to take immediate action to ensure full implementation of the Smithfield Agreement on hog farms and to also mandate phase out of open-air lagoons on all other hog farms in the state as well.

    “On the two-year anniversary of the Smithfield Agreement, negotiated when Gov. Easley served as Attorney General, it is appropriate to recall what was expected — a two-year report identifying alternative technologies to lagoons.  By the five-year anniversary, Smithfield Foods and Premium Standard Farms were to replace hog waste lagoons on company-owned factory farms with environmentally superior technology,” said Jane Preyer, director of North Carolina Environmental Defense.  “Unfortunately, implementation of the agreement already appears to be a year behind schedule.”

    “It is time to set a firm deadline for identifying waste management technologies that are superior to the lagoon and sprayfield system.  The Governor and Attorney General should challenge researchers to complete identification of alternative technologies within the next year.  They should require Smithfield and Premium Standard Farms to fulfill their promises and immediately begin to convert lagoons as soon as the very first superior technology is identified,” said Preyer.

    “The Smithfield Agreement acknowledges that open-air hog lagoons pollute the state’s air and water supplies, threaten the health of citizens and damage the quality of life in rural communities,” said Daniel Whittle, an attorney for North Carolina Environmental Defense.  “If fully implemented, this agreement should set in motion a process to eliminate all hog lagoons in North Carolina once and for all.  The key is full and timely implementation.  So far, there have been multiple delays and wavering commitments.”

    “The agreement with Smithfield Foods and Premium Standard Farms applies only to the companies’ farms.  There are more than 2,000 other farms that use lagoons, most of them under contract with these companies to raise company-owned hogs.  To fully protect the health of citizens, the General Assembly should pass legislation requiring all the state’s regulated hog farms to convert to new technologies by 2006,” said Whittle.

  • Environmental Groups Applaud Historic Global Warming Bill

    July 22, 2002
    Sacramento, CA   Today, Governor Gray Davis signed into law groundbreaking environmental legislation to curb global warming pollution from new passenger vehicles in California. Environmental groups throughout California, including the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Bluewater Network, Coalition for Clean Air, Sierra Club, California League of Conservation Voters, Union of Concerned Scientists, Environmental Defense, Steven and Michele Kirsch Foundation, California Church Impact and others applaud the Governor for his commitment to the environment

    “This law is a tremendous victory for everyone who lives and breathes the air in California,” said Ann Notthoff, California advocacy director for NRDC. “The new law will bring more choices of cleaner cars to California consumers, less of the pollution that causes global warming, along with savings at the gas pump.”

    The signing of Assembly Bill 1493, authored by Assemblymember Fran Pavley (D, Agoura Hills), secures California as a leader in the fight against global warming. The law directs the Air Resources Board to set standards that limit carbon dioxide and other global warming pollutants for new cars and light-duty trucks. It is the first such law in the nation.

    The bill was the center of an expensive lobbying and public relations campaign by the automakers to spread fear and distortion regarding the effects of emissions on global warming. ?Governor Davis and leaders in the State Legislature are to be applauded for standing up to the automakers,? said V. John White of the Sierra Club. ?It is comforting to know that California lawmakers can see through the lies and scare tactics used by the automakers and take a stand for what is important.?

    Jon Rainwater, Executive Director of the California League of Conservation Voters thanked the Governor for his support, ?The Governor has proven his commitment to clean air, and because of his support, California?s environment will be improved for decades to come.?

    The bill gained the support of the Legislature and the governor at the same time the Bush administration was suggesting that Americans should just adapt to global warming.

    Russell Long, Executive Director of Bluewater Network, a sponsor of the bill notes that this is an unrealistic and dangerous request.  “While California can’t stop global warming on its own, Mr. Bush’s refusal to act places the burden squarely upon us to continue to lead the nation and the world in reducing dangerous levels of pollution from vehicles.”

    Nancy Ryan, Senior Economist at Environmental Defense said that the new law would be a victory for California’s economy and environment. “Cleaning up auto pollution is key to sustainable economic growth in California.  AB 1493 puts California in a leadership role in developing a sustainable and robust 21st century economy.”

    The signing of this bill comes on the heels of a June report released by the Bush Administration describing the dangerous and costly effects of global warming.

    “The science is in: global warming poses a serious threat to California’s economy and public health, while the technologies to reduce emissions are readily available and would save consumers money,? said Julia Levin, California Policy Coordinator for the Union of Concerned Scientists. ?It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that we should be doing these things anyway.”

    Cars and light-duty trucks are responsible for 40 percent of California?s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which form a heat-trapping blanket in the atmosphere.  But the technology for reducing these emissions has been available to automakers for some time. ?Cleaner vehicle technologies have been available for years,? said Tim Carmichael, Executive Director of the Coalition for Clean Air ?The standards put into effect by AB 1493 will serve to implement the technologies that scientists and engineers have created for this purpose.  The result will ultimately be more choices for California?s drivers.?

    Dozens of environmental and public health organizations throughout California worked tirelessly to gather the support necessary to make the emission reductions a reality. Together they applaud the Governor and the legislature for their support.
  • Federal Act Recognizes "National Significance" Of Highlands Area

    July 17, 2002
    (17 July 2002—Washington, D.C.) Environmental Defense today praised the Highlands Stewardship Act, introduced by Rep. Ben Gilman (R-NY), that will protect the unique Highlands ecosystem by providing technical and financial assistance to Highlands states. If enacted the bill will allocate $25 million annually over a ten-year period to protect the Highlands region.
     
    “The Highlands, which stretch from eastern Pennsylvania through New York and New Jersey into western Connecticut, provide 11 million people with clean drinking water. The scarcity of water in this region, which many people experienced first hand this spring, reaffirms the need to protect this land from rapid development,” said Jason Patrick, a scientist at Environmental Defense. “This legislation will nationally confirm what 14 million visitors each year, more than those to Grand Canyon National Park, have already discovered.”

    The “national significance” of the Highlands, as noted by the USDA Forest Service Highlands Study in April of 2002, will be recognized in the Highlands Stewardship Act. This legislation will preserve that distinction by providing federal Land and Water Conservation Fund grants through the Department of Agriculture to state, regional and local governments for conservation, education and restoration of the natural, cultural, historical and economical uses of the region.

    “State and local governments can use this funding to protect the Highlands’ critical resources by adopting strategies to manage future growth, conserve forests and open space, safeguard drinking water and provide recreational opportunities while promoting economic growth in the region,” said Patrick. “One in twelve Americans live within two hours travel of the Highlands region, which is home to over 200 threatened or endangered species, including the bald eagle and osprey.”
  • Rule Will Increase Buffers Around Protected Wetlands Of NJ

    July 15, 2002
    (15 July 2002) Environmental Defense today praised the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) for publication of a rule amendment to the Fresh Water Protection Act (FWPA) that will increase the buffer zones around thousands of acres of protected wetlands in New Jersey Commissioner Bradley M. Campbell signed the final rule earlier this month.

    “The NJDEP recognized that precious habitat was not getting the projection it deserved under the law and they acted,” said Jason Patrick, scientist at Environmental Defense. “Commissioner Campbell and the NJDEP deserve praise for following through and making this important rule final.”

    Under the new rule, more wetlands statewide will now warrant a 150-foot buffer, rather than a 50-foot buffer that was previously the norm. The improved buffer zone regulation will not only increase the wetland acres protected but will also provide multiple environmental and economic benefits to the taxpayers of New Jersey.

    “Wetlands are the cornerstone of a healthy environment,” said Jason Patrick. “They serve as spawning ground and home to a vast array of animals, act as a natural water filtration system and provide valuable open space.”

    Environmental Defense used a Geographic Information System (GIS) to analyze the most critical wetland habitat areas in the state. The data concluded that many valuable areas were not being adequately protected under the FWPA. The new rule is the result of the work of Environmental Defense and the NJDEP to ensure that New Jersey’s unique habitat is preserved.
  • House Should Protect California Coast From Drilling

    July 15, 2002
    (15 July 2002 — Oakland) Environmental Defense today called on the U.S. House of Representatives to adopt an amendment to the Interior Appropriations bill being considered this week which would preclude the issuance of any permits for the development of 36 active-but-undeveloped offshore drilling leases near Point Conception on the Central California coast.

    The amendment, expected to be offered on the House floor on Tuesday, July 16, by Representatives Lois Capps (D-CA), Nick Rayhall (D-WV), and George Miller (D-CA), would prevent the expenditure of appropriated funds by the Interior Department for granting any permits for exploration, delineation, or development drilling on the contested federal lease tracts offshore California.

    “The amendment should push the administration to resolve the longstanding impasse over planned new offshore drilling along one of the most sensitive portions of the California coastline,” said Richard Charter, Marine Conservation Advocate with Environmental Defense. “There is an overwhelming bipartisan consensus among virtually all of the players - the California congressional delegation, the Governor, local officials, and even the oil industry, that the question of these 36 active leases must ultimately be resolved through the relinquishment of these tracts. It is now time for the White House to do for California what it recently did for Florida, and find a fair and equitable way to resolve longstanding problems that, in some cases, date back to mistakes made by former Interior Secretary James Watt.”

    Similar congressional intervention preceded a previous 1995 agreement by the federal government to extinguish active-but-undeveloped offshore leases in Alaska’s fishery-rich Bristol Bay, and legislative language identical to that now being proposed for California eventually led to the reacquisition of active-but-undeveloped offshore leases on the fishing grounds of North Carolina’s Outer Banks in 2000.

    In California, Governor Gray Davis, the California Coastal Commission, the state attorney general and numerous conservation groups (including Environmental Defense) are suing the Department of Interior to prevent drilling on these undeveloped offshore leases. Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Simon has also stated his opposition to more offshore drilling on the state’s coastline, and has said that he supports a resolution of the undeveloped coastal leases in question.
  • HOUSE MOVES CLOSER TO ENDING BAN ON NEW FISHING QUOTAS

    July 10, 2002
    (10 July, 2002 — Washington) Environmental Defense today praised the House Resources Committee for voting to lift the current moratorium that prohibits regional fishing councils from adopting the use of new Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs).

    “In light of recent crises in both the New England and West Coast fisheries, it is imperative that regional councils have the option to use quota-based management systems as a way to help protect and preserve fish stocks and to assist commercial fisherman,” said Johanna Thomas, deputy director of Environmental Defense’s oceans program. “IFQs have a proven track record of providing environmental benefits while also increasing sustainability and safety for those who depend on the ocean’s bounty for their livelihood.”

    Since 1996, a ban has been in place that prevents the nation’s regional fishery councils from adopting any new IFQ programs. The moratorium on the use of quotas is set to expire on October 1, 2002. Lifting the restriction will not require councils to adopt IFQs but will provide each council with the option to use this important management tool.

    “The House Resources Committee today acknowledged that individual quotas are an important option for the management of the nation’s commercial fisheries,” Thomas said. “Under a quota-based system boat captains don’t have to choose profits over safety, more fresh fish is available for consumers and fish stocks can be maintained at a sustainable level.”

    While Environmental Defense supports the use of IFQs, improvements must still be made in the bill to maximize future effectiveness. These include standards to help councils design IFQ programs that are equitable and consistent with community and conservation interests; allowing the issuance of “individual quotas” to harvest a quantity of fish, but not authorizing a separate quota program for processing fish; removing the requirement that the regional councils hold referenda before considering the development of an IFQ program; and providing regional councils with the ability to limit the duration of IFQ programs and to recommend eligibility requirements, consolidation limits and cost recovery fees.
  • Most Important Climate Bill in 20 Years Awaits Gov. Davis' Signature

    July 1, 2002
    (1 July, 2002 — Oakland, CA) Environmental Defense hailed today’s passage of the California Climate Bill (AB 1493) in the State Assembly, calling it the most important climate bill passed anywhere in the U.S. in the past two decades. As the bill moves to the Governor’s desk, California now has an unprecedented opportunity to enact serious legislation on climate change. Environmental Defense, a leading member of a broad coalition of environmental, religious and consumer groups that have pushed for AB 1493’s passage, strongly encourages Gov. Davis to sign it into law.

    “Assembly Speaker Wesson, Senator Burton and many of their fellow legislators showed tremendous leadership in moving this bill through the Assembly in the face of a relentless campaign of misinformation and scare tactics from its opponents,” said Environmental Defense California regional director Tom Graff. “We now hope Governor Davis will exercise the same leadership and sign this groundbreaking bill into law. The future of our water supply, our snowpack and our overall climate in California depend on it.”

    Because the federal Clean Air Act gives California the unique ability to set its own standards on auto emissions - standards that can then be followed by the rest of the nation - California has the opportunity to ensure that other states will have the choice to break from the federal government’s policy of inaction on climate change issues.

    “In the wake of the ratification of the Kyoto protocol on climate change by the European Union and Japan, we think California is sending a powerful message to the global environmental community - Americans care about climate change and are willing to take meaningful steps to address it,” said Fred Krupp, executive director of Environmental Defense.

    The newly amended bill forges a consensus on climate change by addressing the concerns of all stakeholders in California from vehicle manufacturers to consumers. AB 1493 will empower the California Air Resources Board to set standards for California’s passenger vehicles to achieve the maximum feasible and cost-effective reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by January 1, 2005. The new regulations would go into effect for the 2009 model year. The act will expand consumer choice by assuring that less polluting SUVs and other models of cars and trucks will be available for purchase, while specifying that no taxes can be imposed on any specific vehicle choice. AB 1493 sets a practical standard for emissions that can be achieved using technology that is available today.
  • Senate EPW Committee Approves Bill to Limit CO2 Emissions

    June 28, 2002

    Environmental Defense today hailed a vote by the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) committee to regulate power plant emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) as well as conventional pollutants - mercury, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrous oxide (NOx).

    “For the first time we now have legislation passed by a Senate committee that cuts and caps emissions of carbon dioxide - a leading contributor to global warming. This is truly a watershed moment,” said Environmental Defense senior attorney Joseph Goffman.

    On a vote of 10 to 8, senate bill S.556 was given the green light by members of the Senate EPW committee. The legislation, authored by Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-VT), could be considered by the full U.S. Senate later this year. But the bill also faces opposition from those who do not want to see Congress enact mandatory restrictions on the amount of CO2 that can be released by power plants into the atmosphere

    “Those who are opposed to mandatory limits on CO2 emissions as part of any multi-pollutant package are simply choosing to bury their heads in the sand. As the federal government’s own report on climate change recently noted, the Earth’s atmosphere is becoming warmer and that is going to affect human health and the environment,” Goffman said. “The longer we wait to act on reducing levels of CO2, the higher the cost will be both in real dollars and in quality of life. That is why it is urgent to find a path to enacting legislation - not in five years, but in the next year - that actually will deliver the reductions.”

  • Pacific Rockfish Closures Tough, But Much-Needed Step

    June 21, 2002

    (21 June, 2002 — Oakland) Environmental Defense today called the Pacific Fishery Management Council’s ruling late Thursday to protect dwindling West Coast rockfish stocks an unfortunate but necessary action to address steep declines in important fish populations that could become extinct.

    “We had hoped, in recent years, that regulators would institute appropriate preventive measures to restore these fisheries in time to avoid the need for broad closures. But today the Council finally found itself facing a very hard decision on how to stop the steep declines in important fish stocks which might otherwise continue toward extinction,” said Environmental Defense marine conservation advocate Richard Charter. “The Council’s action was a tough, but much-needed step.”

    The Council voted last night to immediately close major areas of the West Coast continental shelf and slope to bottom fishing for the remainder of this calendar year. The move is an attempt to limit any further demise of commercially valuable groundfish species including Pacific red snapper, grouper and fantail. A decision about future years’ closures is expected to be issued today.

    As the oversight body in charge of regulating sport and commercial catch of various fish species in federal waters along the U.S. West Coast, the Council chose today to enact a ban on all bottom fishing for rockfish in medium-depth waters north of Cape Mendocino, California, in order to aid in rebuilding critically depleted stocks. The closure comes at a time when mounting scientific data, in the form of newly completed “stock assessments,” points to the need for cutbacks in fishing activities in order to prevent a complete collapse of some species.

    “Over the past several years, scientific evidence has been accumulating that shows the need for more protective fishing limits, particularly in the case of rockfish species that rely on older, mature individuals for much of their reproductive success,” Charter said.

    Some of these species are often inadvertently caught as “bycatch” by fishermen seeking other kinds of fish and are killed as a result. This cycle plays an important role in damaging some of the rockfish stocks, leading to the decline of species that are not necessarily being targeted for harvest. The Pacific Council’s actions, which included an order that all bycatch be released, were aimed at protecting both targeted species and associated bycatch species.

  • Environmental Defense Salutes Passage Of Clean Smokestacks Bill

    June 18, 2002

    (18 June 2002 — Raleigh) Environmental Defense today praised the N.C. General Assembly for passage of the Clean Smokestacks Bill, landmark legislation that will deeply cut harmful emissions from the state’s 14 coal-fired power plants. The Senate gave final approval to the bill today. The House overwhelmingly endorsed the legislation on June 12.

    The bill is based largely on the N.C. Clean Smokestacks Plan, which was developed by a coalition of environmental groups in March 2001. Over the next decade, the bill will require emission cuts in year-round nitrogen oxides by 78% and sulfur dioxide by 73%. Controlling these pollutants will also substantially reduce mercury emissions by more than 65%.

    “The leadership from the bill’s sponsors, Rep. Nesbitt and Senator Metcalf, and from Speaker Black and President Pro Tempore Basnight, has been especially critical in achieving this great legislation,” said Jane Preyer, director of the North Carolina office of Environmental Defense.

    “North Carolina has been waiting with bated breath for passage of this bill,” said Michael Shore, Southeast air quality manager for Environmental Defense. “Southeast states have been watching North Carolina closely, and this legislation sends a clear message to the region and the nation. North Carolina is serious about protecting the health of its citizens by improving air quality.”

    “Most of North Carolina’s pollution is produced in state. Now North Carolina is cleaning its own house with the Clean Smokestacks legislation and can challenge other states in the region to follow suit,” said Shore. “There are more than 150 coal-fired power plants contributing to air pollution in the Southeast, which have a direct impact on air quality in neighboring, downwind states.”

    “More than 33 million Southeasterners live in counties with unhealthy air. Air pollution from power plants is estimated to cost the Southeast over $20 billion in morbidity and mortality costs annually. Smog triggers an estimated 1.7 million asthma attacks and particulate matter, tiny particles emitted from coal-fired power plants, causes an estimated 11,000 deaths each year,” said Shore.

  • Citigroup Teams Up With Alliance For Environmental Innovation To Reduce Environmental Impact Of Copy Paper

    June 13, 2002

    (13 June 2002—New York) Citigroup and the Alliance for Environmental Innovation announced they have teamed up to help reduce the environmental impact of copy paper. Together the Alliance, a project of Environmental Defense, and Citigroup will work to increase the recycled content in copy paper, reduce copy paper use, and develop environmental evaluation criteria for paper suppliers.

    As part of this project, Citigroup worked with the Alliance and paper suppliers and began testing 30% postconsumer recycled copy paper for internal use in April. This month, a second round of testing began. If successful, Citigroup will recommend the purchase of postconsumer recycled copy paper for all U.S. operations, generating significant environmental benefits.

    “Citigroup salutes and strongly supports the work being done by the Alliance for Environmental Innovation and is pleased to partner with them on this project,” said Pamela P. Flaherty, senior vice president of Global Community Relations at Citigroup. “Our company is strongly committed to helping preserve the environment for future generations and we look forward to having our employees become actively involved in finding ways to create environmentally beneficial results when producing and using copy paper.”

    “The myth of the ‘paperless office’ is just that. Even with a move towards paperless technologies, the amount of copy paper used continues to increase dramatically, causing significant environmental impacts,” said Jackie Cefola project manager of the Alliance for Environmental Innovation. “We look forward to working with Citigroup to reduce the water and energy consumption, air pollution and solid waste associated with copy paper, and set an important example for other service firms.”

    The Citigroup/Alliance copy paper project will be carried out by a team with members from both organizations. Citigroup employees participating on the team will represent areas including business services, purchasing, marketing, and environmental affairs. The project’s success will be measured by the extent to which it delivers significant and measurable reductions in energy and resource use, solid waste, and pollution; proves that environmental improvements to copy paper practices are economically and functionally viable; and drives positive change for other service firms. Under the terms of the voluntary agreement, each organization will continue with its own business and advocacy activities and will independently pay its own expenses.

    The Alliance for Environmental Innovation, a project of Environmental Defense, works cooperatively with companies to create environmental solutions that make business sense. For more information, please visit www.environmentaldefense.org/alliance.

     

  • CA Green Groups Call On Davis To Take Action On Global Warming

    June 13, 2002

    (13 June 2002 — Oakland)  Environmental Defense joined today with 15 other state and national environmental groups in urging Gov. Davis to take a leadership role in aiding the passage of AB 1058 in the California Assembly.  AB 1058 would lower greenhouse gas emissions in California by developing cost-effective, sensible regulations on emissions from cars and light trucks sold in the state.

    “AB 1058 is a homegrown solution representing a unique opportunity for California to take a major step to help sustain our climate, our economy and our position as a national environmental leader and innovator,” said Tom Graff, Environmental Defense senior attorney and founder of the group’s California office.  “Governor Davis should demonstrate real leadership by playing a key role in helping pass this legislation.”

    AB 1058 is sponsored by Assemblywoman Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills) and has already passed in both houses of the California legislature.  It needs only final approval by the Assembly and the signature of Governor Davis to become state law.  Under the terms of the bill, by 2005 the California Air Resources Board (ARB) would develop regulations that would ensure “The maximum feasible reduction of greenhouse gases.”  Personal vehicles currently account for 40% of greenhouse gas pollution in California, and these emissions are a prime contributor to global warming. 

    “For years automakers have resisted sensible change on everything from the introduction of unleaded gas to the original “California Emissions” vehicles,” said Graff.  “Despite claims that needed environmental reforms would destroy the economy and limit consumer choice, Americans are now driving cleaner, safer cars in a healthier environment, and consumers have a wide range of choice of vehicles, thanks to the leadership of California’s legislators and citizens.  Governor Davis should continue that tradition of leadership by helping pass AB 1058 and signing the bill into law.”

    “Earth is already beginning to show the effects of global climate change, and the time for action is now,” said Fred Krupp, Environmental Defense executive director.  “By making AB 1058 law, California can show the nation how to effectively reduce greenhouse gas pollution and secure our future.”

  • NSR Rollback Undermines Critical Local Air Quality Protections

    June 13, 2002

    (13 June, 2002 — Boulder)  In one of the most damaging administrative rollbacks in Clean Air Act history, the Bush administration today moved to undercut “new source review” clean air protections that have been instrumental in safeguarding local air quality for more than 25 years.  

    “For more than two decades every American has depended on this critical Clean Air Act program to safeguard local air quality, to ensure healthy air for our families and to protect our national parks from air pollution,” said Environmental Defense senior attorney Vickie Patton.  “The changes announced today clear the way for air pollution increases from large, poorly controlled industrial sources in neighborhoods across America without demanding any accountability.  When implemented, today’s action will only grow pollution instead of slowing it by changing ‘new’ source review into ‘no’ source review.” 

    Under the existing new source review program, power plants and other large industrial sources that lack modern pollution control systems are required to update their pollution reduction technology when action is taken that significantly increases air pollution levels.  Once enacted, the new policies announced today would broadly exempt these old, high-polluting industrial sources from the requirement to modernize their pollution controls, even when they significantly increase air pollution in surrounding neighborhoods and communities.

    “The administration’s initiative would make sweeping changes to this program that will allow virtually all pollution increases from old, high-polluting sources to go unregulated and public participation to be excluded,” Patton said.  “This rollback puts the nation on the path to major pollution increases when sound science tells us we need rigorous pollution cuts to protect public health.” 

    The traditional new source review program required old, high-polluting sources to prevent pollution increases that will worsen unhealthy air quality in urban centers or adversely impact national parks.  The program also gave citizens affected by the increased pollution notice of changes and the opportunity to comment on measures to reduce air pollution.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE PRAISES HOUSE VOTE ON SMOKESTACKS BILL

    June 12, 2002

    (12 June, 2002 — Raleigh) Environmental Defense today applauded members of the N.C. House for passage of the Clean Smokestacks Bill, legislation that will require utility companies to protect public health by reducing harmful pollution from the state’s 14 coal-fired power plants.

    “The public health impacts caused by North Carolina’s dirty air have finally gotten the attention of state lawmakers, and the House vote illustrates the bipartisan support for cleaning up and protecting state air quality,” said Michael Shore, Southeast air quality manager for North Carolina Environmental Defense.  “The Clean Smokestacks Bill is a balanced, fair solution to North Carolina’s air pollution problem, which is bad and getting worse.  The House vote puts us on the right course for clean air.  Now it’s up to the Senate to act responsibly and give the bill its full vote of confidence.”

    “Air pollution affects every North Carolina county, not just those in the mountains or those that are home to coal-fired power plants,” said Jane Preyer, director of N.C. Environmental Defense.  “North Carolina has been waiting for over a year for passage of the Clean Smokestacks Bill, and it’s time for the waiting game to end.  This is a landmark bill that raises the bar for air quality and will encourage similar actions throughout the Southeast to reduce air pollution and protect public health.  But we have to clean our own house first, and that’s what this bill will do.”

    The bill will require emission cuts in year-round nitrogen oxides by 78% and sulfur dioxide by 73%.  Controlling these pollutants will also substantially reduce mercury emissions.  The reductions will occur over the next decade.