Complete list of press releases

  • FLORIDA GOV. CHARLIE CRIST TO ANNOUNCE STATEWIDE CAP ON GLOBAL WARMING POLLUTION

    July 11, 2007


    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     
    Contact:

    Jerry Karnas, Environmental Defense, 941-587-1803 

    Tony Kreindler, Environmental Defense, 202-210-5791


    (Washington – July 11, 2007) Environmental Defense today applauded bold action by Florida Governor Charlie Crist to cap greenhouse gas pollution and direct state agencies to take immediate action to reduce emissions through tighter auto efficiency standards and energy efficiency measures.

     

    “This is what leadership is all about,” said Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp. “Charlie Crist understands that the risks of climate change are great but the opportunities for action are greater, for Florida and the entire country.”

     

    Florida, a politically crucial state in the 2008 election and one of largest economies in the nation, becomes the first state in the Southeast to adopt a greenhouse gas emissions cap. Crist will detail his plans for reducing global warming pollution through a series of executive orders this week at the Florida Summit on Global Climate Change in Miami. The Executive Orders are expected to set greenhouse gas emission reduction targets that will bring statewide emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by the middle of this century, which is consistent with the reductions most scientists say the U.S. must achieve nationally to help avoid the worst consequences of climate change.

     

    Those consequences – rising sea levels, drought, and stronger storms – could have particularly severe impacts on Florida’s natural resources and economy.

     

    The executive orders also are expected to direct state agencies to implement the clean cars standard adopted by California and 11 other states, limit emissions from electric utilities, set efficiency standards for buildings and appliances, and require a percentage of power generation to come from renewable energy sources.

     

    “Governor Crist has hit a grand slam, putting Florida on the map as a true leader on global warming,” said Jerry Karnas, Florida climate project director at Environmental Defense. “We look forward to working with Governor Crist and leaders from across the state to move them forward and make the state a role model for the country.”

     

    The governor’s announcement comes close on the heels of two other states – Hawaii and New Jersey – enacting their own tough statewide emissions caps. Seventeen others have adopted or are working on greenhouse gas emissions limits, and state leaders from across the country have said they must take steps now absent federal action.

     

    “These states’ actions are critical, but they can only go so far. It’s time for Congress to build on their efforts with a national emissions cap – we have a window of opportunity for action, but it won’t stay open forever,” Krupp said.

     

    Joining Governor Crist in Miami on Friday  at the Summit will be California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, the first to sign a statewide emissions cap for greenhouse gases. Environmental Defense is  the lead sponsor of the Florida Summit on Global  Climate Change.

  • Bingaman Proposal Reflects Growing Support for Mandatory Climate Change Policy

    July 10, 2007



    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


    Contact:

    Tony Kreindler, Environmental Defense, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791


    (Washington – July 10, 2007) Senator Jeff Bingaman tomorrow is expected to introduce the 9th significant climate change bill in the Senate this session, reflecting continued growth in bipartisan support for mandatory limits on global warming pollution.

     

    But despite improvements from previous drafts, Senator Bingaman’s bill still contains a fatal flaw that would seriously undermine climate protections.

     

    “The safety valve is a dangerous kill switch that could turn off the whole program,” said Steve Cochran, national climate campaign director at Environmental Defense. “There are much better ways of managing costs than giving up on the environmental goal altogether.”

     

    The safety valve in Senator Bingaman’s bill would put a price ceiling of $12 per ton of carbon dioxide under an emissions cap and trade system. If emissions allowances traded by companies reached the price ceiling, companies could buy unlimited cut-rate emissions allowances from the government – effectively jettisoning the bill’s mandatory emissions limits.

     

    The safety valve included in Senator Bingaman’s bill:

     

    • Undermines the fundamental goal of an emissions cap. Fixing the climate problem means capping and reducing carbon emissions. Previous government analysis of similar legislation has shown that the operation of a safety valve prevents climate bills from achieving their own emissions reduction targets. 

     

    • Limits investment in new low-carbon technologies. Putting a ceiling on the price of emissions allowances puts a ceiling on the amount of private-sector capital that could flow to the development of the clean energy technologies needed to make deep reductions in U.S carbon emissions.

     

    • Is bad for farmers and Rural America. A cap and trade system will create a major new market for emissions allowances, and anyone who can make emissions reductions can profit. If companies can buy allowances from the government at a below-market price, they have no incentive to buy allowances from farmers who could generate more than $8 billion worth of reductions through no-till farming, methane capture and other practices.

     

    Senator Bingaman’s bill will be referred to the Environment and Public Works Committee, where subcommittee Chair Joe Lieberman and Ranking Member John Warner are preparing comprehensive climate legislation. The two senators recently announced that they expect to bring legislation to a markup in their subcommittee before the August congressional recess.

  • Clean Hog Systems Can Boost Economy by $10 Billion, Create Thousands of Jobs

    July 10, 2007

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    CONTACT:
    Joe Rudek, 919-881-2913
    Tanja Vujic, 919-881-2916

    (Raleigh, NC - July 10, 2007) Environmental Defense today released an economic analysis that shows North Carolina can gain the equivalent of 7,000 jobs and add $10 billion to its economy if the hog industry moves from open-air lagoons to innovative systems for treating swine waste. The study confirms that public and private investment in innovative waste systems will bring economic benefits for both farmers and the communities that surround them. The study provides further evidence that incentives and cost-share programs can help make new systems that protect the environment and public health affordable for farmers.

    “This study should end debate over the affordability of cleaner systems and refocus efforts to get these systems on the ground and develop markets for byproducts. Bottom line is that the hog industry will remain economically strong, and communities will become healthier places to live and work,” said Joe Rudek, senior scientist with the NC office of Environmental Defense. “Now policy makers have reliable data showing that incentives and cost-share programs can help make cleaner waste systems affordable for all farmers. Public investment in cost-share programs will deliver big benefits to North Carolina, especially to the eastern region of the state.”

    “This is good news for hog farmers and for communities. Economic progress and environmental progress go hand in hand,” said Tanja Vujic, attorney with the NC office of Environmental Defense. “Lawmakers now have solid evidence to guide them in making North Carolina the cleanest hog-producing state in the country. It’s time to sharpen the pencils and design meaningful programs to put innovative systems into farmers’ hands.”

    The study was conducted by Wilbur Smith Associates in collaboration with the NC office of Environmental Defense. Wilbur Smith Associates is a leading provider of economics and market analysis consulting services to various government agencies, including federal, state, local and regional agencies, as well as private sector clients.

    The study is available at www.environmentaldefense.org/nchogeconomics.

  • Freshman Economics: Farm Policy Reform Benefits Farmers Represented by Most New Members of Congress, Study Shows

    July 9, 2007
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
     
    Contact:
    Scott Faber, sfaber@environmentaldefense.org, (202) 230-1899-c
    Sean Crowley, scrowley@environmentaldefense.org, (202) 572-3331-w
     
    (Washington, DC – July 9, 2007) – A new report shows farmers in most districts represented by freshman members of Congress would benefit if Congress shifted some farm subsidies to voluntary USDA conservation programs.
     
    The study, “Freshman Economics: Subsidy Reform Would Help More Farmers in Freshman Districts,” shows that farmers in 36 out of 55 freshman congressional districts would receive more support from USDA by shifting “direct” payments to provide more funding for voluntary USDA conservation programs. In addition, farmers in 12 districts would see little or no change from farm policy reform proposals.
     
    Congress is debating a new five-year Farm Bill this summer and the House Agriculture Committee will consider whether to extend the current Farm Bill next week.
     
    “Helping farmers help the environment would also ensure that more farmers and more regions receive a fair share of federal farm spending,” said Scott Faber, Farm and Food Policy Campaign Director for Environmental Defense. “Freshmen members who vote against reform and for the status quo are voting against the interests of their own farmers.”
     
    Unlike farm subsidies linked to market conditions, direct payments are subsidies linked to a farmer’s production history and paid regardless of current crop prices or production. Most farmers do no grow crops eligible for the direct payments, and the largest 10 percent of direct payment recipients collect 60 percent of all payments. 
     
    Environmental Defense examined three scenarios — shifting $10 billion, $15 billion, and $20 billion over five years to USDA conservation programs — and found that farmers represented by following freshman members of the House from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and Wisconsin would benefit:
     
    Democrats
    Gabrielle Giffords (D-Tucson/Sierra Vista, AZ)
    Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton/Stockton, CA)
    Joe Courtney (D-Enfield/Norwich/Danielson, CT)
    Christopher S. Murphy (D-New Britain/Meriden, CT)
    Kathy Castor (D-Tampa, FL)
    Ron Klein (D-Ft. Lauderdale/West Palm Beach, FL)
    Tim Mahoney (D-Port Charlotte/Martin/Highlands, FL)
    Mazie K. Hirono (D-Honolulu, HI)
    John A. Yarmuth (D-Louisville, KY)
    John P. Sarbanes (D-Annapolis/Towson, MD)
    Keith Ellison (D-Minneapolis, MN)
    Paul W. Hodes (D-Concord, NH)
    Carol Shea-Porter (D- Manchester/Dover, NH)
    Michael A. Arcuri (D-Utica/Auburn/Cortland, NY)
    Kirsten E. Gillibrand (D-Glens Falls/ Hudson/Saratoga Springs, NY)
    John J. Hall (D-Goshen/Carmel, NY)
    Heath Shuler (D-Asheville, NC)
    Zachary T. Space (D-Dover, OH)
    Charles A. Wilson (D-Canfield/Marietta/Bridgeport, OH)
    Jason Altmire (D-Aliquippa/Natrona Heights, PA)
    Christopher P. Carney (D-Clarks Summit/Shamokin/Williamsport, PA)
    Patrick J. Murphy (D-Bristol/Doylestown, PA)
    Joe Sestak (D-Media, PA)
    Ciro Rodriquez (D-San Antonio/Fort Stockton/Eagle Pass, TX)
    Peter Welch (D-Burlington, VT)
    Steve Kagen MD (D-Appleton/Green Bay, WI)
     
    Republicans
    Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield/Atascadero, CA)
    Doug Lamborn (R-Colorado Springs, CO)
    Gus M. Bilirakis (R-Temple Terrace, FL)
    Vern Buchanan (R-Bradenton/Sarasota, FL)
    Bill Sali (R- Boise/Caldwell/Coeur d’Alene/Lewiston, ID)
    Peter J. Roskam (R-Bloomingdale, IL)
    Michele Bachmann (R-Woodbury/St. Cloud/Waite Park Office, MN)
    Dean Heller (R-Reno/Elko/Las Vegas, NV)
    Mary Fallin (R-Oklahoma City/Shawnee, OK)
    David Davis (R-Kingsport, TN)
     
    “Reforming farm policies would allow many more farmers to participate in USDA conservation programs,” Faber said. “Two out of three farmers are turned away when they offer to share the cost of clean water and wildlife habitat because of our misplaced spending priorities.”
     
    For a breakdown of how farmers in freshman congressional districts would fare under these scenarios and to see the full report, visit www.environmentaldefense.org/farms.
     
    ### 
     
  • New Study Shows that Clean Hog Waste Systems Will Boost NC Economy by Billions of Dollars

    July 6, 2007



    MEDIA ADVISORY

    July 6, 2007

     

     

    What:

    Teleconference releasing the results of a landmark analysis that documents the significant economic benefits of replacing outdated hog lagoons with clean, innovative systems for managing waste.  The analysis, conducted by Wilbur Smith Associates, goes beyond previous research on economic impacts conducted by NC State University.

     

    When:

    Tuesday, July 10 at 11:00 am.  Call 866-740-1260 and enter conference code 881-2922.

     

    Who:

    Joe Rudek, senior scientist, NC Office of Environmental Defense

    Tanja Vujic, attorney, NC Office of Environmental Defense

     

    Background:

    Environmental Defense will release an analysis that shows significant economic opportunities for North Carolina if the state’s hog industry replaces lagoons and sprayfields with new, clean systems for treating hog waste.  The results clearly indicate that investment in innovative systems that generate marketable byproducts can help the hog industry and the eastern region of the state by creating thousands of jobs and boosting the regional economy by billions of dollars.  The study’s design projects that new technologies would be installed on all NC hog farms over four years.

     

    Visuals:

    Hog farm tours with excellent visuals can be arranged upon request.

     

    Contact:

    For an embargoed copy of the economic analysis, contact Georgette Shepherd, 919-881-2927 or gshepherd@environmentaldefense.org.  Environmental Defense experts are available for interviews today through the public release of the report. 

  • Freshman Economics: Farm Policy Reform Benefits Farmers Represented by New Members of Congress, Study Shows

    July 6, 2007

    WHAT:            Shifting subsidy payments to voluntary U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs that provide cleaner air, energy and water would support more farmers in 36 of the 55 districts represented by freshmen members of the U.S. House of Representatives, according to an analysis by Environmental Defense. If Congress enacted this reform proposal when it reauthorizes the Farm Bill this summer, districts in the following states would receive a larger share of federal farm spending:  

     

    Arizona (Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Tucson/Sierra Vista)

    California (*Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Pleasanton/Stockton)

    Florida (*Rep. Tim Mahoney, D-Port Charlotte/Martin/Highlands)

    Hawaii (*Rep. Mazie Hirono, D-Honolulu)

    Idaho (Rep. Bill Sali, R-Boise/Caldwell/Coeur d’Alene/Lewiston)

    Nevada (Rep. Dean Heller, R-Reno/Elko/Las Vegas)

    Ohio (Rep. Zachary Space, D-Dover/*Rep. Charles Wilson, D-Canfield/Marietta/Bridgeport)

    Pennsylvania (*Rep. Chris Carney, D-Clarks Summit/Shamokin/Williamsport)

    Texas (*Rep. Ciro Rodriquez, D-San Antonio/Fort Stockton/Eagle Pass)

    Vermont (*Rep. Peter Welch, D-Burlington)

     

    *Supports legislation to increase conservation funding

     

    WHY:              Renewal of farm and food policies in the 2007 Farm Bill provides a chance to help many more farmers who offer to clean up the environment. Currently, farmers in 20 districts collect half of all Farm Bill spending and two-out-of–three farmers offering to clean up the environment are rejected because of misplaced spending priorities.  A majority of House members support bills that would dramatically increase conservation funding.

     

    WHO:              Scott Faber, Farm Policy Campaign Director, Environmental Defense

                            (Read Scott’s Farm Bill blog: http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/healthyfarms)

     

    WHEN:            Monday, July 9, 2007, 12:30pm ET

     

    HOW:              News Conference/Teleconference call (800) 804-0064; passcode: 6460177

     

    CONTACT:     Sean Crowley, (202) 572-3331-w, scrowley@environmentaldefense.org  

  • SCHWARZENEGGER APPOINTS MARY NICHOLS TO AIR RESOURCES BOARD

    July 5, 2007


    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    July 3, 2007

    Contacts:
    Tom Graff, Environmental Defense: 510.593.3899
    Jennifer Witherspoon, Environmental Defense: 415.216.9598
    Virgil Welch, Environmental Defense: 916.261.4405

    Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed Mary Nichols to chair the California Air Resources Board today following the recent departure of Robert Sawyer as chairman and Catherine Witherspoon as executive director. “We are pleased with this appointment,” said Tom Graff, California regional director of Environmental Defense. “Mary Nichols has the environmental experience and leadership necessary to guide the pioneering efforts of the Air Resources Board to implement solutions to fight catastrophic climate change and to clean our air.”

    Environmental Defense was a co-sponsor of AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act, and is working closely with the California Legislature, the Governor’s office and the California Air Resources Board to design and implement the landmark legislation that requires that global warming emissions be “capped” at 1990 levels by the year 2020 and to “cut” emissions from major emitting sources in California. This legislation will reduce “business as usual emissions” by 174 million metric tons or more than 25 percent by 2020.

    “Implementing AB 32 is going to require every tool in the toolbox,” said Graff. “We need the right person at the helm of CARB to choose which tool to leverage and when. Mary will be able to strike the right balance between regulation and market-friendly solutions to serve both the environment and the economy. In the process CARB will be forging a path that other states and the nation can follow.”

    CARB is the nation’s leading air quality regulatory agency and has a worldwide reputation.  It has enjoyed bi-partisan political and public support, led by board chairs who have demonstrated independent judgment and a firm commitment to improving California’s air quality, during both Republican and Democratic administrations. Because of California’s unique authority under the federal Clean Air Act, the policies adopted in California often set the pace for the nation.  The integrity and capability of the board have never been more important.

    Background on Mary Nichols: Mary Nichols has a distinguished career as a public servant and excellent environmental credentials, including serving as a trustee of Environmental Defense (Environmental Defense Fund). She has previously served as the chair of the California Air Resources Board under Governor Jerry Brown and under her tenure the board required cars to have catalytic converters and banned lead in gasoline. After a brief stint on the DWP board under former Mayor Tom Bradley, Nichols went to Washington as assistant administrator for air quality issues at the Environmental Protection Agency during the first Clinton administration. Shortly after returning to California, Gray Davis tapped her to be state Resources Secretary. Nichols came back to L.A. to head up the UCLA Institute for the Environment and, then she returned to the DWP board. Prior to her EPA appointment, she served as a senior staff attorney and director of the Los Angeles office of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Governor Edmund G. Brown appointed her chair of the California Air Resources Board; and Mayor Tom Bradley, to the five-member board of commissions of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Nichols has extensive experience in environmental law and in administration of public sector agencies responsible for civil litigation and environmental policy. She has written on and taught environmental and legal issues. A founding trustee of the California Environmental Trust, she was awarded a B.A. degree from Cornell University and a J.D. degree from Yale Law School.

  • NC Senate Passes Renewable Energy Bill

    July 3, 2007

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Michael Shore, 828-582-3141 (c)
    Jane Preyer, 919-740-6727 (c)

    (Raleigh, NC — July 3, 2007) Environmental Defense today applauded the North Carolina Senate for passage of Senate Bill 3, which would establish a 12.5% renewable energy and efficiency standard (REPS).

    Passage of an REPS bill by the NC General Assembly would make North Carolina the first state in the Southeast to require that a percentage of its electric demand be met with clean energy sources.

    “The key to a clean and cost-effective energy future is for North Carolina to develop its abundant renewable and efficiency resources,” said Michael Shore, senior air policy analyst with Environmental Defense. “It is critical that the General Assembly pass a renewable and efficiency standard this year to clean the air, reduce global warming pollution, and put off the need to build expensive coal and nuclear power plants.”

  • Environmental Defense Statement on the Food and Drug Administration's Decision to Block Imports of Farmed Seafood from China

    June 29, 2007

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Katharine Burnham, (202) 415-5742

    (Washington, DC - June 29, 2007) The following statement can be attributed to David Festa, director of the Oceans Program at Environmental Defense. Prior to joining Environmental Defense, Festa was director of policy and strategic planning at Department of Commerce working on U.S. fisheries issues among others.

    “This decision by the FDA indicates the importance of getting it right when it comes to fish farming. Fish farming – or aquaculture – can ease the strain on our oceans caused by the increasing global demand for seafood. But when environmental and food safety controls are lacking, we are all at risk.

    Close to 80% of the seafood consumed in the United States is imported, with China the largest provider of all. And this demand will only continue to grow as the health benefits of seafood are more widely recognized.

    There are three steps in getting fish farming right: information, innovation and vigilance. First, consumers need to know where their seafood comes from. The USDA has a chance right now to improve requirements for Country of Origin food labeling and recently re-opened the existing rule for comment. Government and industry have great opportunities to step up. Second, innovation and technology can minimize the need for antibiotics and additives in the first place and ensure that the environmental impacts of fish farming are negligible. Finally, inspectors should improve testing protocols to keep consumers safer and provide a strong incentive for good aquaculture.

    We don’t need to turn our rivers, bays and seas into vast aquatic feed lots. With good aquaculture and better management of our wild fish, we can have our fish and save the environment too.”

    To speak with David Festa, please contact Katharine Burnham at (202) 415-5742.

  • Environmental Defense Joins Interior Secretary to Celebrate American Bald Eagle's Removal from Endangered Species List

    June 28, 2007

    Thursday, June 28, 2007

     

    Contact:

    Sharyn Stein, 202-572-3396 or 202-460-6512, sstein@environmentaldefense.org

     

    Washington, D.C. – Environmental Defense Wildlife Program Chairman Michael Bean joined Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne for a historic announcement today that the American bald eagle is being removed from the endangered species list 40 years after it was on the brink of extinction.

     

    The first step in the eagle’s recovery was a U.S. ban on the toxic pesticide DDT in 1972, the first campaign launched in 1967 by Environmental Defense, originally called the Environmental Defense Fund.  (The U.S. ban on DDT also has helped restore other species of threatened birds, including osprey, peregrine falcons and brown pelicans.) The other crucial factor in the bald eagles’ revival was implementing Endangered Species Act recovery management practices, including returning eagles to areas from which they’d vanished or no longer nested, establishing National Wildlife Refuges, and enforcing strict protection measures. 

     

    “Today we are celebrating the bald eagle’s graduation from threatened status, after a long and difficult recovery that would not have been possible without the U.S. ban on DDT and The Endangered Species Act,” said Bean, who has led the Environmental Defense wildlife team since 1977 and joined Secretary Kempthorne and other leaders at a 10am announcement ceremony at the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C. “This is a resounding victory for the Endangered Species Act and a great gift to the American people of restoring our national symbol just in time for Independence Day.”

     

    The bald eagle was listed under The Endangered Species Preservation Act in1967 (the precursor to The Endangered Species Act of 1973). The bald eagle population in the continental U.S. has soared since then, from fewer than 500 known pairs to almost 10,000 today.

     

    American bald eagles were upgraded from “endangered” to “threatened” in 1995. Today the birds were officially taken off the list altogether. However, the species will fall back under the safeguard of another federal law — The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act — which Congress passed in 1940 to ban killing, wounding, or disturbing bald eagles. That law should provide enough protection to keep the eagles from sliding back into endangered territory again. However, other species will still need more protection.

     

    “The bald eagle is safe for now, but more than 1,300 other species remain on the endangered list,” said Art Cooley, a former high school biology teacher who joined a small group of scientists that founded Environmental Defense and launched the effort that eventually led to a DDT ban in the U.S. “We must keep working to keep them from extinction. To achieve that goal, Congress should build upon the successes of the Endangered Species Act by passing the Endangered Species Recovery Act.”

     

    The Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2007 is a bipartisan measure sponsored by Senators Mike Crapo (R-ID), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) that would offer $400 million in annual tax credits, along with other tax deductions and exclusions, to landowners who volunteer to help endangered or threatened plants or animals on their property.  The House bill (H.R. 1422) has 34 cosponsors (see list at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR01422:@@@P ) and the Senate bill (S. 700) has 22 cosponsors (see list at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00700:@@@P ), including Senators Max Baucus (D-MT) and Charles E. Grassley (R-IA), the chair and ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over tax legislation, so it has a realistic chance of becoming law.  

  • Environmental Defense Welcomes Boxer's Commitment to Quick Action on Climate

    June 27, 2007

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     

    Contact:

    Tony Kreindler, Environmental Defense, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791 cell

    (Washington – June 27, 2007) Environmental Defense today praised Senator Barbara Boxer’s support for quick action on comprehensive legislation to address climate change through an economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions cap and trade system.

     

     Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner today announced that together they will draft comprehensive climate legislation and bring it before the Subcommittee on Private Sector and Consumer Solutions to Global Warming and Wildlife Protection before the August congressional recess. The bill would then come before the full Environment & Public Works Committee, which Boxer chairs. She said she hopes to have her committee approve the bill before the end of the year.

     

     “Barbara Boxer’s commitment to getting  a bipartisan bill through her committee makes all the difference in forging a consensus solution to the climate problem in this Congress,” said Steve Cochran, national climate campaign director at Environmental Defense.

  • Interior Secretary Kempthorne to Make Major Announcement on Status of Bald Eagle

    June 27, 2007

    What:           Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne is expected to announce that the U.S. national symbol, the American bald eagle, is flying off the Endangered Species List on Thursday, June 28, thanks in large part to a U.S. ban on the toxic pesticide DDT in 1972, the first campaign launched by the national non-profit group Environmental Defense Fund, now known as Environmental Defense (see www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/244_Where%20It%20All%20Began.htm ). 

     

    When:            Thursday, June 28, 2007

    10:00 a.m. EDT news conference for DC-based reporters

    1:30 p.m. EDT teleconference for non-DC-based reporters

     

    Where:           Jefferson Memorial, Washington D.C.

    In case of inclement weather, the event will be held at the Department of the Interior, 1849 C. St, NW, Washington, D.C. Please call 202/208-5636 for details.

     

    For reporters unable to attend the event in Washington, D.C., a press teleconference will be held on Thursday, June 28, 1:30 p.m. EDT.  To access the call, please dial 1-800-857-1092 and tell the operator the passcode “bald eagle” and the call leader “Nicholas Throckmorton.”  You will be asked for your name and media affiliation.

     

    Notes to media attending Washington, DC event:

     

    Reporter Drop off and Satellite Vans: The drop off for reporters is on East Basin Drive, the one-way, westbound-only, street that runs between the Jefferson Memorial’s Old Parking lot and I-395. Once dropped off on East Basin Drive, it is approximately a 250-yard walk to the Plaza side of the Jefferson. Only live trucks will be allowed to park on East Basin Drive.  If you plan to broadcast parts of the event live, you will need a 750 foot cable.

     

    Parking for all other media-related vehicles: Available at parking Lots “A,” “B,” or “C,” accessible from Ohio Drive on the Potomac River side of the Jefferson Memorial (and which are located south of the George Mason Memorial and SOUTH of the Inlet Bridge). Parking lots are approximately 300 yards south of the Jefferson Memorial and are situated in between the spans of the 14th Street Bridge or I-395. 

     

    Why:            The American bald eagle was first declared endangered in 1967, but after four decades of hard work by scientists, citizens, and government agencies, the species is making a remarkable comeback from the brink of extinction. In 1963, there were only less than 500 nesting pairs of bald eagles left in the lower 48 Unites States; today, there are almost 10,000 (see state-by-state statistics at

                        www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/population/nos_state_tbl.html ). 

                           

    Who:               Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne

    Lynn Scarlett, Deputy Secretary, Department of the Interior

    Matt Hogan, Executive Director, Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

    Jim Lyon, Senior Vice President for Conservation, National Wildlife Federation

                            Michael Bean, Chairman, Wildlife Program, Environmental Defense –

     

    Bean is a wildlife attorney who has led Environmental Defense’s wildlife team since 1977. Nationally recognized as an expert on incentive-based endangered species conservation and the Endangered Species Act, in 1995 he played a lead role in creating the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Safe Harbor program. It assures a landowner who agrees to carry out activities expected to benefit an endangered species that no added Endangered Species Act restrictions will be imposed on the landowner as a result. He also can discuss bipartisan legislation in Congress to create tax incentives to conserve endangered species that live on private lands (see news release at www.environmentaldefense.org/pressrelease.cfm?ContentID=6009 ). 

     

    Contact:             Sharyn Stein, sstein@environmentaldefense.org , 202-460-6512–c

                            Colin Rowan, crowan@rowcom.com , 512-799-6400

  • Environmental Defense Praises Bipartisan Plan for Senate Action on Climate

    June 27, 2007


    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     

    Contact:

    Tony Kreindler, Environmental Defense, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791 (cell)

    (Washington – June 27, 2007) Environmental Defense today applauded Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner for their groundbreaking commitment to act quickly on legislation that puts a firm cap on U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, a move that opens the door for Senate passage of a consensus climate change bill this year.

     

    “This helps put the Senate right where it needs to be – on track with the mainstream of Americans and U.S. business leaders calling for action,” said Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp.

     

    Steve Cochran, national climate campaign director at Environmental Defense , said, “This is huge. Joe Lieberman and John Warner are clearing the path for a bill that protects the climate and strengthens the economy, and that’s the kind of plan both sides of the aisle can support.”

     

    The two senators today said they intend to draft new legislation to cut global warming pollution through an economy-wide cap and trade system that guarantees emissions reductions and encourages U.S. innovation to find the best and least-cost ways to achieve them.

     

    Lieberman and Warner said they hope to bring the bill to their subcommittee for a vote before the August congressional recess, a schedule that puts Congress on the path to passing a bill this year.

     

    “We need to get on the path to emissions reductions now – not in the next Congress or the next administration. Joe Lieberman and John Warner deserve real credit for their commitment to quick and meaningful action, and we look forward to working with them on a bill that gets us where the science says we need to be,” Krupp said.

     

    Most scientific experts say the U.S. needs to reduce emissions 80 percent below current levels to help avert the worst consequences of climate change. Environmental Defense and the other members of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, which includes market-leading companies like GE, DuPont, Caterpillar, and GM, are calling on this Congress to pass legislation that spurs deep emissions reductions and private-sector investment in clean technologies through a cap and trade system.

     

    Lieberman and Warner are the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s subcommittee on private sector and consumer solutions to global warming and wildlife protection.

     

  • Statement by Environmental Defense on New Appointments to Federal Fishery Management Councils

    June 26, 2007

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     

    Contact:

    Katharine Burnham, 202-415-5742

     

    (Washington, DC—June 25, 2007) Environmental Defense applauds the Department of Commerce and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for their selections to regional fishery management councils announced today.  Members of the councils shape and develop fishery management plans within their geographical area.  Individuals in these positions can help move forward practical solutions that improve the health and resiliency of our fisheries and oceans.

     

    Environmental Defense recognizes that many of today’s appointments will advance ocean conservation.  In particular, we are pleased to recognize the following individuals who stand out for their demonstrated leadership in working towards sustainable fisheries and conservation of marine habitats and ecosystems:

     

    New England Fishery Management Council

     

    Mr. Frank Blount (RI) has demonstrated great skill as a consensus builder who puts science-based management of the resource and the public interest first.  He is a fisherman and business owner with over two decades of experience in fisheries management.  He was previously a three-term member and chairman of the New England Council and his return to the Council will greatly advance the goal of restoring New England fisheries. 

     

    Mr. Colin “Rip” Cunningham (MA) currently serves as Vice Chair of the New England Council.  Mr. Cunningham has advocated for swift implementation of the new requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, including catch limits, catch shares and other accountability measures. 

     

    Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council

     

    Ms. Julie Morris (FL) currently serves on the Gulf Council in addition to her responsibilities as Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs and Director of the Environmental Studies Program at New College of Florida in Sarasota.  She supports ending overfishing with the use of catch shares and additional conservation methods.  As former chair of the Gulf Council she has advocated for sound decision-making practices and is committed to pursuing the public interest.

     

    Pacific Fishery Management Council

     

    Mr. Dan Wolford (CA) is a retired aerospace engineer and an avid recreational fisherman who has been volunteering to ensure that West Coast fisheries are managed with credible science and concern for the ecosystem.   He will be a strong voice for these principles as a council member.  This is his first appointment to the Pacific Council.

  • Environmental Defense and DuPont Launch Comprehensive Tool for Evaluating and Addressing Potential Risks of Nanoscale Materials

    June 21, 2007


    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

     

    Contacts:   

     

    Melanie Janin, Environmental Defense, 202-572-3240, mjanin@environmentaldefense.org

    Michelle Reardon, DuPont, 302-774-7447, michelle.s.reardon@usa.dupont.com                               

                    

     

    WASHINGTON, D.C., June 21, 2007 – Environmental Defense and DuPont today released a comprehensive framework to assist with the responsible development and use of nanotechnology and to help inform global dialogue on its potential risks.  The Nano Risk Framework is intended for use around the world by small and large companies, regulatory agencies, universities, and others with an interest in commercializing nanoscale materials.

     

    Environmental Defense and DuPont began a partnership on nanotechnology in September 2005, creating a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in science, engineering, law and business.  The goal was to develop a systematic and disciplined process for evaluating and addressing the environmental, health and safety risks of nanomaterials across all stages of a product’s lifecycle – from initial sourcing through manufacture, use, and recycling or disposal.  

     

    The resulting Framework offers a thorough and usable six-step process for organizations to identify, assess and manage potential risks.  The six steps within the Framework include: describing the material and the intended application; profiling the material’s lifecycle in this application; evaluating the associated risks; assessing risk management options; deciding and documenting actions; and regularly reviewing new information and adapting actions accordingly. 

     

    “Nanotechnology has the potential to unleash innovations in materials, energy, and other fields that could lead to powerful environmental and health benefits,” said Director of Corporate Partnerships at Environmental Defense Gwen Ruta.   “Our intent is to help reap the full promise of this technology without creating unintended consequences.  We want to get this right the first time around.”  

     

    “This Framework outlines a disciplined process for the responsible development of nanomaterials,” said DuPont Vice President and Chief Sustainability Officer Linda Fisher.  “At DuPont, we have adopted this approach as a part of our mandatory product stewardship process, and we encourage others to do the same.  While we do not see this Framework as a substitute for regulation, we hope that it assists governments in drafting appropriate regulations.”

     

    In developing the Framework, Environmental Defense and DuPont solicited and received significant feedback from a broad range of interested parties, including other companies and NGOs, government officials and academics. The Framework uses proven risk-management techniques in order to fully integrate with any current environmental, health and safety practices in place within companies.  It also provides several new elements that can be instrumental in understanding the unique potential risks of nanomaterials, including: the recommendation to develop informational profiles (or “base sets”) regarding the properties, hazards, and exposures associated with a given nanomaterial; and guidance on developing more detailed information on physical-chemical properties, ecotoxicity and environmental fate than has typically been used in existing risk management profiles.  

     

    In order to evaluate the effectiveness, flexibility and practicality of the Framework, DuPont conducted three demonstration projects on three different classes of nanoscale materials: a new titanium dioxide-based product, carbon nanotubes and zero valent iron. 

     

    “These projects were selected not only because they are of interest to DuPont, but also because they represent a good test of the Framework,” DuPont Global Regulatory Affairs Director Terry Medley said.  “Each represents a different position for DuPont in the value chain and is at a different stage of development.  The projects required different resources, produced varying outcomes, and each demonstrated different aspects of the Framework.”  The three projects were:

     

    ·         A new titanium dioxide-based product, called DuPont™ Light Stabilizer 210, which is designed as sun protection for plastics.  An announcement about this product and its commercial availability will be made in the near future.  Not all of the particles in this product fit the specific definition of nanomaterials, since a significant fraction is larger than the threshold 100 nanometer size.  However, this material proved to be a good test of the Framework’s methodology.  The Framework helped DuPont develop a comprehensive exposure and hazard profile for this material prior to commercialization.

     

    ·         Carbon nanotubes incorporated into polymer nanocomposites to improve mechanical and electrical properties of engineering thermoplastics.  DuPont currently conducts basic research and development using carbon nanotubes for potential future product applications.  The company used the Framework to refine internal management procedures and to identify questions to be answered for such applications before they move from R&D toward commercialization. 

     

    ·         Nano zero valent iron, which DuPont was evaluating for potential use in groundwater remediation. Use of the Framework identified a number of questions regarding the physical safety, fate and transport of the material for this environmental application.  DuPont chose not to pursue use of this material until these questions could be addressed. 

     

    Environmental Defense, a leading national non-profit organization, represents more than 500,000 members.  Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems.

     

    DuPont is a science-based products and services company. Founded in 1802, DuPont puts science to work by creating sustainable solutions essential to a better, safer, healthier life for people everywhere. Operating in more than 70 countries, DuPont offers a wide range of innovative products and services for markets including agriculture and food; building and construction; communications; and transportation.

     

    #   #  #

     

    6/21/07

     

    Editor’s Note: To learn more about the Framework or to download a copy, see www.NanoRiskFramework.com .