Complete list of press releases

  • Climate Director Joins NC Environmental Defense Fund

    March 26, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Michael Regan, 919-881-2917
    Georgette Shepherd, 919-881-2927
     
    (Raleigh, NC - March 26, 2008) North Carolina Environmental Defense Fund has named Michael Regan as Southeast climate and air policy manager.
     
    Regan spent the last decade with the US Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, DC, and Research Triangle Park, NC. Most recently he was a national program manager focusing on multi-pollutant emission reduction strategies, energy efficiency, climate change, and the implementation of market-based solutions to improve air quality.
     
    A native of Goldsboro, NC, Regan received a BS in Earth and Environmental Science from NC Agricultural and Technical State University and a MA in public administration from George Washington University, Washington, DC.
     
  • New

    March 19, 2008
    For Immediate Release
     
    Contact:
    Katharine Burnham (202) 415-5742

    (Washington, DC-March 18, 2008) Americans are eating more fish than ever, and seafood sales increase dramatically during the Lenten season. The fish counter can be a confusing place though, even for the most educated fish lover. Many ask, how many times a week can I safely eat tuna? Is it ok to eat swordfish again? 
     
    To help consumers make the most informed seafood choices while shopping or eating out, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) introduces a new way for consumers to access health and environmental information electronically about their favorite kinds of seafood.
     
    The “Seafood Selector To-Go,” http://m.edf.org/seafood, provides consumers with mobile access to recommendations for more than 200 popular seafood choices thus eliminating guess work and having to rely on fishmongers or waiters. Shoppers can easily access the best substitutes for their favorite but overfished choices as well as exactly how many times they can eat choices like tuna and swordfish.
     
    “Many eco- and health-conscious consumers are confused about issues such as overfishing and mercury,” said Tim Fitzgerald, marine scientist for EDF. “This new tool provides easy access to best and worst choices, as well as more detailed health and environmental information and recipes.”
     
    To provide consumers with clear, consistent information, Environmental Defense Fund and the Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch program recently harmonized their seafood eco-guides. Choosing ocean-friendly fish is of growing importance as our oceans are in decline from overfishing, habitat destruction and pollution. Along with helping consumers choose the most environmentally-friendly choices, EDF is working with local fishermen and fisheries managers to promote policies that will ensure a greater abundance of healthy, local and ocean-friendly seafood.
     
    “We want to give busy consumers a variety of ways to access our unique compilation of environmental and health research, be it on wallet cards, our Seafood Selector website, or their mobile device,” continued Fitzgerald.
     
    Seafood sales traditionally increase 30 percent during the weeks between Ash Wednesday and Easter Sunday. The rest of the year, most American seafood dollars are spent in restaurants.
     
    “Until restaurants and supermarkets offer this kind of information at point-of-purchase, consumers will need assistance in making the best seafood choices for them and their families,” offered Fitzgerald.
     
    ###
     
    About Environmental Defense Fund
    Environmental Defense Fund is at the forefront of an innovation revolution, developing new solutions that protect the natural world while growing the economy. Founded in 1967 and representing more than 500,000 members, the group creates powerful economic incentives by working with market leaders and relying on rigorous science. For more information, visit edf.org.
     
  • Manufacturing CEOs Take to Airwaves to Support Cap on Global Warming Pollution

    March 17, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Tony Kreindler, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791

    (Washington, DC – March 17, 2008) Chief executives from top American manufacturing companies are taking to the airwaves in an unprecedented national advertising campaign that calls on Congress to drive economic growth with a cap on global warming pollution.  
     
    The ad, sponsored by Environmental Defense Action Fund, features the CEOs of two respected American brands – Robert Lane of Deere & Co. and Alexander M. “Sandy” Cutler of Eaton Corp. – along with Frank Knapp, president of the 5,000-member South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.
     
    Together they say solving climate change is an opportunity to jumpstart the U.S. economy, and that America can own the energy technologies that will power the 21st Century if Congress acts quickly. Amid a heated national debate over job losses, the business leaders point to the job-creating power of a national cap on global warming pollution.
     
    “We joined this effort because green is not only good for the environment, it’s also good business,” said Sandy Cutler, chairman and chief executive officer of Eaton, a Cleveland, Ohio-based diversified industrial manufacturer with 70,000 employees worldwide. “This ad tells the real story about climate change: American companies can lead the way and win the race for new technologies and the jobs that come with them if Congress acts now.”
     
    “Small business entrepreneurs are ready to be turned loose on developing new energy technologies and conservation efforts.  We’re just waiting for the federal government to open the gate,” said Frank Knapp Jr., of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.  “It’s not just about creating a new industry and jobs, it’s also about protecting our existing businesses and employees from the negative impact of global warming.”
     
    The ad campaign launches as Congress approaches a critical juncture in the climate change debate: the Senate will soon vote on the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, which would substantially reduce U.S. emissions through an emissions cap and trade system. The House is expected to begin debating a similar plan next month, increasing the odds that Congress will enact a cap this year.
     
    “When corporate leaders openly ask Congress to pass a major environmental law, you know it’s critical to our economic future. These companies want Congress to act now for the economy’s sake,” said David Yarnold, president of Environmental Defense Action Fund. “The environmental imperative is clear, and the CEOs in this ad know the economic reality better than anyone. Congress has a common-sense plan that works for both, and an opportunity to get it done in 2008. There is no time for delay.”
     
    The ad begins running today in dozens of key congressional districts across the country and in Washington, D.C. View the spot online at http://www.edf.org/AmericanJobs
     
  • EPA Analysis Forecasts Robust Economic Growth With Climate Change Law

    March 14, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Tony Kreindler, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791 (cell)

    (Washington – March 14, 2008) A new Environmental Protection Agency analysis of leading climate change legislation shows that the U.S. economy can grow substantially with an ambitious cap on global warming pollution, given that the bill will continue to speed the development of advanced energy technologies.
     
    “EPA’s results for the scenario that most resembles the bill confirm what we have seen in every reputable analysis. We can grow our economy and tackle global warming at the same time,” said Nathaniel Keohane, PhD, director of economic policy and analysis at Environmental Defense Fund. “The up-front costs EPA identifies are a sound investment for a strong economy down the road.  For clean air, less imported oil, and avoiding the damage of climate change, they are a bargain.” 
     
    According to EPA’s analysis of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 2191), economic modeling with confident high-technology assumptions shows the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growing 81 percent between 2010 and 2030 without a national emissions cap – and virtually the same amount, 80 percent, with the bill’s limit on greenhouse gases.
     
    Other key findings of the EPA high-technology model run include:
     
    • Under the Climate Security Act, annual household consumption grows by 81 percent from 2010 to 2030 – just two percentage points less than what growth would be otherwise.
    • Emissions allowances would cost $22 - $35 per ton in 2015 and $28 - $46 in 2030 – significantly less than other model runs that do not account for current energy policy and market mechanisms to manage costs.
    • National electricity prices would never rise more than 20 percent over 2005 levels – and that change would happen slowly over decades.
    “No single model run tells the full story, but we think the high-technology run in this case represents the best single set of assumptions. It underscores the need for continuing technological innovation, and the best way to drive that is by putting a cap and trade market in place,” Keohane said. “The high technology scenario is a map to the pot of gold, and frankly the most realistic path, but the Bush Administration and Senator Inhofe have forced EPA to run other scenarios that are extremely unlikely — just to frighten the public about doing what’s necessary.
     
    “But one key question remains unanswered: what it will cost if we don’t act quickly to cap emissions. There are two sides to the ledger,” Keohane added.
     
    According to recent studies by the University of Maryland and Tufts University, unchecked climate change will strain public budgets and impact jobs and competitiveness in every economic sector. According to the University of Maryland study, the most expensive climate policy for the U.S. is not having one.
     
    ###
    About Environmental Defense Fund

    Environmental Defense Fund is at the forefront of an innovation revolution, developing new solutions that protect the natural world while growing the economy. Founded in 1967 and representing more than 500,000 members, the group creates powerful economic incentives by working with market leaders and relying on rigorous science. For more information, visit edf.org.

     

     

  • EPA final rule to clean up diesel pollution from trains, ships stronger than proposed rule

    March 14, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Janea Scott - (917) 674-0513-c or jscott@edf.org
    Sean Crowley – (202) 559-6524-c or scrowley@edf.org
     
    (Houston, Texas – March 14, 2008) In an announcement from the bustling Port of Houston, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today finalized and improved upon its proposed emission standards to dramatically reduce harmful particulate pollution and smog-forming nitrogen oxides from the nation’s fleet of diesel locomotive engines, tugs, barges, ferries and recreational marine engines. 
     
    When fully implemented, the new standards will cut particulate pollution from each engine by 90 percent and smog-forming oxides of nitrogen from each engine by 80 percent. The health benefits of this rule will outweigh the costs by 15 to 1.  These engines are a major source of smog-forming pollution and the extensive emission cuts will help communities here in Texas and across the nation achieve the new ozone health standard announced on Wednesday.     
     
    “These clean air standards will mean millions of Americans will have healthier and longer lives,” said Environmental Defense Fund President Fred Krupp. “From trains to ferries, the nation is transitioning to a bold new era of cleaner diesel engines. As today’s diesel fleet turns over, diesel engines will no longer churn out suffocating black plumes of smoke.”
     
    The rule provides for clean air standards comparable to those that EPA has adopted for large diesel trucks and buses, and for construction, mining and agricultural equipment. The standards will be achieved through the combination of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel and advanced engine systems. The new rule is stronger than the proposed rule because it accelerates the implementation deadline for locomotive diesel engines by two years from 2017 to 2015, accelerates the implementation deadline for the largest marine engines covered by the rule from 2016 to 2014, and requires marine engines to meet a more protective standard when they are rebuilt.
     
    “EPA deserves praise for issuing a final rule that is stronger than its original proposal,” said Environmental Defense Fund staff attorney Janea Scott, who testified at an EPA hearing last May about the proposed rule and attended the EPA announcement of the final rule in Houston.  “These additional and earlier reductions in pollution mean cleaner, healthier air sooner.  Cleaner diesel engines will improve the health of our neighborhoods and communities near ports and railyards, and will help keep the nation on track in achieving the new health standard for smog.”
     
    Most of the ships and trains in the U.S. today are powered by diesel engines. Diesel trains and ships, such as ferries and tugboats, are major sources of air pollution. Diesel exhaust contains toxic chemicals that together with diesel particulate matter pose a cancer risk greater than that of any other air pollutant. Each year, diesel locomotives and commercial ships together emit nearly two million tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxides. Both are major sources of lethal particulate pollution.
     
    Environmental Defense Fund has documented the extensive air pollution from both ships and locomotives. Learn how commercial marine shipping is polluting our air here and learn more about locomotive pollution here.
  • Statement on NAM-ACCF Analysis of Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act

    March 13, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     

    Contact:
    Tony Kreindler, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791 (cell)

     

    (Washington – March 13, 2008) An analysis released today by the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Council on Capital Formation dramatically overstates the potential cost of reducing global warming pollution under the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act and ignores the severe economic impact of inaction.

     

     “Unfortunately, we’ve seen this sort of scare tactic every time Congress takes up a major environmental law. The fact is, the dire predictions never come true,” said Steve Cochran, director of the National Climate Campaign at Environmental Defense Fund. “Instead of rehashing wrong assumptions about climate policy, it would be much more productive for NAM and ACCF to take a hard look at what it will cost if we do nothing at all.”
     
    The analysis of S. 2191 released today is based on the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) model, which is used by the Energy Information Administration. However, the “input assumptions” used by NAM and ACCF produce dramatically different results from other estimates – including previous EIA modeling of similar legislation and work done by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
     
    The misguided assumptions used by NAM and ACCF include:
    • No use of market tools to manage costs. This is directly counter to the provisions of the Climate Security Act, which provides for banking and borrowing of emissions allowances to keep costs down.
    • Artificially limited use of offsets. The analysis caps offset use at 20 percent. This also is counter to the provisions of S. 2191, which allows 30 percent of reductions from offsets.
    • Very limited carbon capture and storage (CCS). The modeling appears to assume that there will be few if any coal plants built with CCS, causing prices to go through the roof.
    • Very limited use of renewable energy. In fact, the “low-cost” assumption about wind power (less than 5 gigawatts per year) is lower than the actual amount of wind power deployed in 2007 (5.244 gigawatts).
    • Unreasonably high oil prices and no price response as a result of climate policy. MIT on the contrary predicts producer prices falling as a result of curtailed demand.
    Most importantly, the analysis only looks at one side of the ledger. NAM and ACCF consider the costs of reducing emissions, but not the costs of inaction. According to recent studies by the University of Maryland and Tufts University, unchecked climate change will strain public budgets and impact jobs and competitiveness in every economic sector. According to the University of Maryland study, the most expensive climate policy for the U.S. is not having one.
     
    ###
     
    About Environmental Defense Fund
    Environmental Defense Fund is at the forefront of an innovation revolution, developing new solutions that protect the natural world while growing the economy. Founded in 1967 and representing more than 500,000 members, the group creates powerful economic incentives by working with market leaders and relying on rigorous science. For more information, visit edf.org.
     
  • White House Unprecedented Action Threatens Nation's Bedrock Clean Air Protections

    March 12, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Dr. John Balbus, (202) 572-3316-w, (301) 908-8186-c, jbalbus@edf.org
    Vickie Patton, (303) 447-7215-w, (720) 837-6239-c, vpatton@edf.org
    Sean Crowley, (202) 572-3331-w, (202) 550-6524-c, scrowley@edf.org
     
    (Washington, DC – March 12, 2008) The White House today took the unprecedented step of overruling the chief of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in determining the nation’s ambient air quality standard for ground-level ozone (“smog”) under the Clean Air Act.    In 1970, a bipartisan Congress entrusted EPA with protecting human health and welfare from air pollution by commanding that the nation set clean air standards based on science alone.    The design of control strategies can and must take economics into account, but standards must be science-based. Any doubt on this issue was ended by a unanimous 2001 decision by Justice Antonin Scalia, in which the Supreme Court held that national air quality standards are to be based on science alone, consistent with 30 years of successful implementation of the Clean Air Act. Today, this time-tested framework for protecting health and the environment from air pollution were cast aside.   
     
    While EPA has in fact tightened the ozone health standard from 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075 ppm — the least protective end of the 0.070-0.075 ppm range it proposed last June — it fell far short of the protection unanimously recommended by EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC), a range of 0.060 ppm to 0.070 ppm. Further, the White House instructed EPA to remove a separate standard designed to protect forests, land, soils, and crops from ozone air pollution. The White House illegally replaced science with politics.
     
    “For generations, a time-tested commitment to science and law has protected America’s health and environment,” said Vickie Patton, deputy general counsel for Environmental Defense Fund and a former attorney for the EPA General Counsel’s office. “The White House today cast aside science and law to impose its will upon EPA, leaving America’s health and environment behind.”
     
    EPA itself attests that ozone harms crop production and native ecosystems “more than any other air pollutant.” Research indicates that current ozone levels lead to dramatic reductions in plant and forest growth and adverse effects on overall ecosystem health.
     
    EPA’s decision today was required under a court-ordered settlement with American Lung Association, Environmental Defense Fund, Earthjustice and other groups. The Clean Air Act mandates EPA to review the science every five years and determine whether the national air standards should be adjusted in line with the science. EPA missed its deadline for ozone, prompting the groups to sue to force EPA to make the compulsory decision.
     
    An overwhelming body of scientific studies demonstrates serious health effects from ozone exposures at and below the level of the current standard of 0.08 ppm. These studies include laboratory-based exposure studies of healthy young adults showing lung inflammation and decreased lung function after 6.6 hours of exposure to 0.08 ppm, numerous epidemiology studies in adults, young children and infants demonstrating worsened respiratory symptoms and lung function at levels well below the current standard, and a robust array of studies showing increased risk of premature death from ozone exposure well below the current standard. 
     
    By tightening the ozone standard from 0.08 ppm to 0.075, the agency estimates the new standard annually will prevent at least 820 deaths, 1,400 heart attacks, 1,890 emergency room visits for asthma, and 610,000 lost school days by the year 2020.
     
    In contrast, EPA estimates that an ozone health standard of 0.065 ppm — the midpoint in the range of 0.060 to 0.070 ppm unanimously recommended by EPA’s independent science advisory committee — would prevent at least 2,330 deaths, 4,000 heart attacks, 4,600 emergency room visits for asthma, and 1,300,000 lost school days in the year 2020.
  • Energy Innovators Showcased in New Book by Environmental Defense Fund President Fred Krupp

    March 3, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact:
    Charlie Miller, Environmental Defense Fund, (202) 572-3364, cmiller@edf.org
    Sharyn Stein, Environmental Defense Fund, (202) 572-3396, sstein@edf.org

    (Washington, DC – March 3) A groundbreaking new book, Earth: The Sequel – The Race to Reinvent Energy and Stop Global Warming, unveils an attainable vision for solving the greatest crisis of our time. In sharp contrast to books offering little beyond dire warnings and grim statistics about global warming, Earth: The Sequel maps the path to recovery.

    The book spotlights the innovators and risk-takers who are pushing technology to the limit to find new ways to create clean energy, increase efficiency and cut global warming pollution. It offers a behind-the-scenes tour of the dynamic transformation of today’s multi-trillion-dollar energy sector.

    Written byFred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense Fund, and journalist Miriam Horn, Earth: The Sequel will be available in bookstores across the country on March 10, as Congressional debate on global warming legislation nears a critical stage.

    “The moment that America’s political leaders act to limit global warming pollution, we’ll see private investors rush to get behind these bold new inventions and bring them to market,” said Krupp. “New fortunes will be made that will dwarf the megafortunes of the information technology revolution.”

    Earth: The Sequel introduces a group of dynamic young companies and entrepreneurs working to find the newest, cleanest and most abundant ways to power the globe:

    • Scientists at California-based Innovalight have found a cheap substitute for costly solar panels: they dissolve silicon nanocrystals in ink that can be printed onto any surface to harvest solar energy. 
    • The founders of Amyris are reengineering yeast so it can ferment sugar into pure hydrocarbon fuels, virtually identical to jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. • Cambridge-based GreenFuel feeds carbon dioxide from power plant smokestacks to algae and then turns the algae into biodiesel, aiming to clean up pollution and beat oil at $60 per barrel.
    • A tribe of Native Americans, fishermen for 2,000 years in the roughest waters of the North Pacific, are now working to harvest the fierce power of the waves themselves. 
    • A New Jersey neurobiologist is developing a scrubber for coal plant smokestacks using the same enzyme that removes carbon dioxide from the human bloodstream.
    • An MIT bioengineer redesigns viruses so that they grab conductive metals and assemble themselves into the most powerful batteries ever seen.

    “By pairing the power of markets with the ingenuity and innovation found on every page of this book, we can reverse global warming before it is too late,” said Krupp. “It’s a race for the future of our planet, and Congress will fire the starting gun by putting a cap on global warming pollution.”

    Congressional action on global warming is expected in the coming months. The Senate soon will vote on the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, a cap-and-trade bill approved by the Environment and Public Works Committee last December. In the House, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell has said he will introduce legislation this year with the support of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who calls passage of comprehensive climate legislation a top priority.

    For more information and to view the book video trailer, visit www.EarthTheSequel.com.

    ###

    About the Authors
    In his 23 years as president of the Environmental Defense Fund, now representing 500,000 members, Fred Krupp has been the foremost champion of harnessing market forces for environmental ends. Miriam Horn is the author of Rebels in White Gloves (Times Books 1999) and has written for a number of publications, including Vanity Fair and The New York Times.

  • Los Angeles Airport to Fund Largest U.S. Study on Airport Pollution Impact on Local Community

    February 25, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

    Contact:  
    Sean Crowley, 202-550-6524-c, scrowley@ed.org   
    Flor Barajas-Tena, LAANE, 213-977-9400 x. 137, fbtena@laane.org
     
    (Los Angeles, CA – February 25, 2008) The Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners voted today to fund the largest study in the nation examining toxic sources of pollution attributable to airport operations and the impact on nearby communities. The vote authorized the hiring of an independent expert, Jacobs Consultancy, to conduct the $2.15 million study starting in June at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).
     
    LAX is the fifth busiest airport in the world in passenger traffic and the seventh busiest in cargo. The LAX Master Plan Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Report concluded that “the health effects associated with these pollutants, particularly chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, have been found to be prevalent among certain minority populations who may also have less access to healthcare.”
     
    “We salute the board of commissioners for funding this unprecedented study to provide vitally important data to protect children who live, play and attend school near LAX,” said Laurie Kaye, a policy analyst for Environmental Defense and a member of the LAX Coalition for Economic, Environmental, and Educational Justice. “This study is the result of a very long process of drawing together experts across regulatory agencies, academics in the field of receptor modeling and air pollution monitoring, and representatives from El Segundo and the LAX Coalition.”
     
    “This landmark decision by the Board of Airport Commissioners will enable the City to alleviate some of the worst air quality impacts on communities near LAX,” said Flor Barajas-Tena, Director of the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy (LAANE) and LAANE’s representative on the LAX Coalition for Economic, Environmental, and Educational Justice. “This study is an example of how community benefits can contribute to the creation of healthy communities.”
     
    One example of the disproportionate effects of LAX on the adjacent community is Felton Elementary School in the Lennox School District. As a result of the school’s location directly beneath the flight path and a lack of airport mitigation funding over the past decade, children must sit in classrooms with no windows to protect them from the noise and air pollution.
     
    The study is part of the historic, legally binding contract that LAWA signed three years ago this month with more than 20 school districts, labor unions, and environmental and community based groups represented by the LAX Coalition. This Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) with LAWA provided $500 million of measures to offset the impact of LAX’s $11 billion Master Plan on low income, heavily minority population areas surrounding the airport. These benefits include residential noise reduction, job training, a first-source hiring program, a living wage, a health study and green building principles. 
     
    Finally, the CBA requires all construction equipment to be retrofitted with the best available control technology to reduce emissions. To enforce this provision, LAWA and the LAX Coalition have worked together to hire their own runway cop called the “independent third party monitor.” No other airport in the country has ever had anyone in a similar job.
     
    To date, vehicles now retrofitted have reduced toxic particulate matter that is associated with heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, asthma attacks, reduced lung function, bronchitis, and premature death by the equivalent of 4.5 million less car miles traveled or more than nine round trips to the moon. 
    ###
     
    Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. www.environmentaldefense.org
     
    For a copy of the new Environmental Defense report: “Everybody Wins: Lessons from Negotiating Community Benefits Agreements in Los Angeles,” please visit www.environmentaldefense.org/everybodywins
     
    Founded in 1993, LAANE is recognized as a national authority on issues affecting the working poor and an innovator in the fight against working poverty. Combining a vision of social justice with a practical approach to social change, LAANE has helped set in motion a broad movement based on the principle that hard work deserves fair pay, good benefits and decent working conditions. www.laane.org
  • New Ad Campaign Urges Commuters to Speak Out For Mass Transit Improvements and Congestion Pricing

    February 25, 2008

     

     

    (NEW YORK, NY) February 25, 2008 – Two diverse coalitions – comprised of civic, environmental, public health, labor, community and business organizations – today kicked off an advertising campaign urging subway, bus and commuter train riders to support implementation of a congestion pricing plan to improve mass transit and reduce traffic.

    The print campaign urges New Yorkers to visit www.BetterTransit.org to learn how metropolitan subways, buses and commuter rail lines will benefit from congestion pricing by reducing traffic and raising new transit funds. The campaign was unveiled at Grand Central Station by members of the Campaign for New York’s Future (CNYF) and the Empire State Transportation Alliance (ESTA) the same week the MTA is expected to unveil its capital plan and less than five weeks before the deadline for the State Legislature to approve a congestion pricing plan that would qualify New York City for $354 million in immediate federal transit aid and generate $500 million annually to improve transit.

    “These ads have a powerful message for riders: Speak up for congestion pricing now or pay later, with more delays, crumbling subway stations and decaying transit infrastructure,” said Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign.

    The print ads feature three different messages, including one depicting a pair of sneakers with the caption, “When this mode of transportation is faster than the bus, you know it’s time to fix the city’s traffic problem.” A second print ad shows multiple pairs of hands gripping a subway pole and asks, “All in favor of less crowded trains, raise your hands.” The third print ad depicts a subway car sign that reads, “Occupancy by more than 180 persons is dangerous and unlawful” with the following caption underneath, “Makes you wonder why they don’t have rules like this for rush-hour subway cars.” The subway and bus “raise your hands” and “sneakers” ads will also run in Spanish. The print campaign will be seen in 4,000 subway cars, 4,518 buses and 870 commuter trains throughout the MTA transit system until the end of March

    A 30-second television ad also began airing today on local stations, sponsored by Environmental Defense, an environmental non-profit group with more than 50,000 members in New York City. The ad speaks of the rise in New York City’s population growth and its consequence for clean air and transit overcrowding. The ad’s voiceover asks, in part: “What if congestion pricing prepared us for that future and started reducing overcrowding now? What if every penny went to public transportation, create new bus and subway lines? What if this bold plan meant less traffic, cleaner air and a healthier environment in all five boroughs? What if New York lets this chance pass us by?” The ad, and information about the environmental benefits of congestion pricing, can be viewed at www.ed.org/traffic.

    “Congestion pricing is the best way to prepare this growing, dynamic city for a future with a million more people by 2030,” said Ramon Cruz of Environmental Defense. “By offering every New Yorker a fast, environmentally sound commute, we can tackle the twin challenges of climate change and economic justice. With our city’s population growing and our streets and subways already overcrowded, now is the time act.”

    “Polls show that a majority of New Yorkers in each borough support congestion pricing if the funds are use to improve transit,” said Robert Yaro, President of the Regional Plan Association. “That’s because riders everyday experience the need for a wide range of transit improvements, from new subway cars and buses to rehabbed stations to more and better service.”

    “Straphangers in the Bronx have suffered long enough,” said Yolanda Gonzales, Executive Director of Nos Quedamos, Inc. in the Bronx. “We must seize this opportunity to use congestion pricing to improve our mass transit system.”

    “In board rooms and hearing rooms across the state, the congestion pricing debate has raged on,” said Paul Steely White, Executive Director of Transportation Alternatives. “Now, with these powerful new ads, the issue enters the forum that matters most: our grossly underfunded trains and buses.”

    “It’s time to stop treating transit service like the weather, something out of our control that doesn’t always cooperate,” said Kate Slevin, executive director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign. “These ads help New Yorkers understand that they have a say right now- by voicing support for congestion pricing they will help secure better transit service and faster commutes.”

     

    “Now is the time for transit riders to clearly communicate that congestion pricing will improve our quality of life, by reducing traffic, shortening commute times, and at last funding needed transit investments,” said Peter H. Kostmayer, President Citizens Committee for New York City. “Now is the time for legislators to listen to the needs of their transit rider constituents, who are the overwhelming majority of New Yorkers after all.”

    “We believe riders will respond strongly to the message and speak up for funding better transit,” said Chris Ward, President of the General Contractors Association of New York.

    “We need to continue to invest in our transit system if we want to maintain the economic vitality and quality of life of our region,” said Dr. Jim Melius from the New York State Laborer’s Union.

    “Better transit equals better quality of life for those residents most dependent on the city’s buses and trains,” said Cecil Corbin-Mark, Deputy Director, WE ACT for Environmental Justice, Inc. “These ads let New Yorkers know that congestion pricing isn’t just about reducing traffic; it’s also about generating revenue to make transit faster and healthier. This will benefit all New Yorkers, and especially those suffering from asthma and other respiratory illnesses.”

    “Clean, efficient transportation for all is a matter of survival for New Yorkers,” said Christine Berthet, co-founder of CHEKPEDS, a Westside pedestrian advocacy group. “These ads will encourage them to speak up in favor of a city where you can commute and breathe at the same time.”

    “In their daily struggle to get to work riders often question who can do something to make it better,” said Kevin Corbett, Co-Chair of the Council on Transportation. “These ads will remind them they can – by taking action now.”

    “Anyone who is concerned about congestion pricing, or transportation in general, as an economic justice issue should be looking at how to provide every New Yorker with equal access to a decent, fast, car-free commute,” said Anne Pope of Sustainable Flatbush in Brooklyn. “Obviously, such a huge expansion and upgrade of the mass transit system will require a massive amount of funding, and congestion pricing is one of the few proposals capable of bringing that money into the system.”

    “Congestion pricing is good for commuters in Queens, despite what many Queens politicians would have you believe,” said Mike Heffron, a Queens resident and member of Transportation Alternatives. “Hopefully these ads will bring this message past the anti-congestion pricing lobby and directly to the people of Queens who are waiting to cram onto their bus or train.”

    “As the Bronx and other outer-borough communities of New York realize the need for expanded and improved transit networks in their neighborhoods, these new ads will surely bring the message home and show all New Yorkers we do have options in improving our daily commutes,” said Walter C. Houston, Chief Executive Officer of the Local Development Corporation of West Bronx.

    “The vast majority of Bronxites take the subway, express bus or Metro-north when they travel into midtown Manhattan,” said Rich Gans, chair of the Transportation Alternatives Bronx Chapter. “After seeing these ads, I hope they speak up for congestion pricing and transit improvements, so we finally get treated fairly, especially since transit riders don’t clog our streets and pollute our air. It just makes sense.”

    “We’ve heard it time and time again: there’s too much traffic, commute times are too long and the mass transit system is falling short,” said Michael O’Loughlin, Director of the Campaign for New York’s Future. “New Yorkers deserve better and we’re giving them a voice to demand a solution from our elected officials. We need transportation improvements today and the best people to demand those improvements are the people who will benefit the most. Subway, bus and commuter train riders can no longer be silent on this issue, so we’re asking them to speak out to support better transit today and for our future.”

    On January 31, the New York City Traffic Mitigation Commission recommended a congestion pricing plan that, if approved by the City Council and State Legislature by March 30, would qualify New York City for $354 million in federal transit aid to fund innovative programs like a Bus Rapid Transit system as well as the addition of more buses and subway cars on the busiest routes in the city. The congestion pricing plan would also raise $491 million in net revenues on an annual basis that would go to continued mass transit improvements throughout the system.

    The City and MTA have proposed a series of major short- and long-term transit improvements before and after the plan would go into effect. In the short-term, these improvements include: 367 new buses; eight new local routes; new bus-only lanes on the Manhattan and Williamsburg; several Bus Rapid Transit lines; 46 subway cars; station renovations; and suburban park and ride facilities.

    In the long-term, congestion pricing and other increased government aid is projected to raise $30 billion over 25 years. These funds could help pay for: the MTA’s program to bring the subways to a “state of good repair,” including renovating stations, buying more rail cars and buses; and repairing transit infrastructure. Long-term pricing dollars could also help fund the building of the Second Avenue subway; connecting the Long Island Rail Road to Grand Central Terminal; and Metro North access to Penn Station.

    In addition to today’s ad campaign launch, last week Transportation Alternatives and Citizens Committee also began a similar print advertising campaign in community newspapers throughout the City, highlighting the specific traffic reductions and transit improvements congestion pricing will bring to local neighborhoods throughout the city. These ads are scheduled to run through the end of March.

    The advertising efforts are funded by groups active in ESTA and CNYF, which together represent more than 160 organizations across the city. Together, they raised more than $500,000 for ads in the transit system as part of a campaign engage the region’s 8.9 million daily riders in speaking up for congestion pricing and the much-needed transit enhancements congestion pricing will make possible. The print ads were created by Bart Robbett and Rob Rosenthal of Robbett Advocacy Media based in Westport, Conn.

    For more information about the benefits of congestion pricing or to view the print and television ads, please visit www.BetterTransit.org and www.ed.org/traffic.

    ***

     

    Gene Russianoff
    NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign
    (917) 575-9434
     
    Neysa Pranger
    Regional Plan Association/ESTA
    (917) 532-0567
     
    Virginia Lam or Bud Perrone
    Campaign for New York’s Future
    (Rubenstein Communications)
    (212) 843-8342; vlam@rubenstein.com
    (212) 843-8068; bperrone@rubenstein.com
     
    Evan Thies
    Environmental Defense
    (BerlinRosen Public Affairs)
    (917) 715-9265

    The Campaign for New York’s Future (CNYF) is an unprecedented coalition of more than 150 environmental, public health, civic, labor, community and business organizations that have joined in support of PlaNYC. For more information about the Campaign, please visit: www.CampaignForNewYork.org

    The Empire State Transportation Alliance (ESTA) is a coalition of business, civic, labor and environmental organizations that seek to build consensus for expanded resources for New York State transportation. Through research, public outreach and advocacy, ESTA advocates for ambitious spending plans that continue the progress made in restoring New York’s mobility infrastructure. Since 1999, ESTA has identified potential investment scenarios and crafted effective education and outreach campaigns that increase public understanding of the urgent capital program needs facing the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and New York State Department of Transportation.

    Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. www.environmentaldefense.org

     

    ###

     

    For media inquiries, please contact:

     

  • Statement by Environmental Defense on House Climate Change White Paper

    February 25, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact:
    Tony Kreindler, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791 (cell)

    (Washington – February 25, 2008) Environmental Defense today commented on the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s latest climate change “white paper.”  
     
    “Though we strongly disagree with some of its conclusions, this paper could be an important examination of the state-federal issues facing the committee as it crafts legislation. In the absence of a federal legislative proposal, however, it remains, at best, largely an academic exercise,” said Steve Cochran, national climate campaign director at Environmental Defense. “The sooner we have a bill, the sooner we can have a constructive debate.”
     
    The white paper released today by Chairmen John Dingell and Rick Boucher examines the proper federal and state roles in a national cap and trade system for greenhouse gas emissions. The paper says states play an “essential role” in combating climate change, but it also suggests a diminished role for states under a national system. Environmental Defense continues to believe that groundbreaking state efforts like California’s clean car program are essential elements of an effective national climate strategy.
     
    “We’re pleased that the paper, in some ways, recognizes the important role of states, because state leadership has provided the only concrete steps toward solving the climate problem so far. But we’re disappointed that it raises questions about their future role, particularly without pointing to any concrete federal policy,” Cochran said. “Suggesting that states should never move beyond federal policy when it comes to tailpipe emissions ignores a long pattern of success under the Clean Air Act, and could be a recipe for failure on this most urgent of issues.” 
     
    “We urge the Committee to move forward quickly with the more complete draft of a comprehensive climate policy that the Chairmen have promised, so that everyone can roll up their sleeves and work out the specifics on this and other issues. We’re confident that they can be resolved in a balanced and environmentally effective manner once we have that framework, and that a bill so urgently needed to protect the climate can be advanced,” Cochran added.
     
    ###

    Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members.  Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. 
    www.environmentaldefense.org

  • Environmental Defense Welcomes Apparent Benefits of Capture and Storage Power Plant

    February 19, 2008

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact: Jim Marston, Environmental Defense, 512.478.5161-w or 512.289.5293-w
    Media Contact: Chris Smith, Environmental Defense, 512.691.3451-w or 512.659.9264-c csmith@environmentaldefense.org

    (Austin – February 19, 2008) Tenaska announced today plans to develop a site near Sweetwater, Texas, where it will build a coal-fueled electric generating plant able to capture up to 90 percent of the carbon dioxide produced. The carbon dioxide would be sold for use in enhancing oil production in the Permian Basin, potentially resulting in geologic storage of the carbon dioxide underground.

    The following statement can be attributed to Jim Marston, director of the Texas Regional Office of Environmental Defense:

    “Environmental Defense welcomes Tenaska’s announcement today. It appears to have many environmentally preferable characteristics, including:

    • A plan to capture 90% of carbon dioxide emissions, which includes commitment to design and build a power plant with carbon-capture equipment.
    • A plan to work with oil producers to use captured carbon dioxide for Enhanced Oil Recovery and sequester the carbon dioxide permanently.
    • Dry cooling, meaning reduced water use.
    • A preferable location in the western part of Texas that is not upwind of Texas cities with existing air pollution problems.

    We look forward to discussing with Tenaska ways to make legally binding the promises they have made concerning the capture and storage of their carbon dioxide emissions so that we do not oppose their applications for a permit.”

  • Environmental Defense Names "Boundary Crosser" as Executive Director

    February 19, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact: Sean Crowley 202-572-3331 or scrowley@environmentaldefense.org
                  
    (New York, NY – February 19, 2008) – Environmental Defense has named David Yarnold its new Executive Director and President of its lobbying arm, the Environmental Defense Action Fund.
     
    A Pulitzer Prize-winning editor at the San Jose Mercury News, Yarnold, a native of San Mateo, CA, joined New York-based Environmental Defense in April, 2005, as its first Executive Vice President. Environmental Defense has nearly 350 employees and more than 500,000 members. Called “…one of the hottest environmental groups around” by The Wall Street Journal, Environmental Defense was ranked first among environmental groups — and second overall — in the 2007 Financial Times global study of 850 business-nonprofit partnerships.
     
    The Stanford Business School Center for Social Innovation Review called Yarnold a “boundary crosser,” citing the unusual nature of his cross-sector career path. During a 27-year career at the San Jose Mercury News, Yarnold served as Editor, Executive Editor and Managing Editor. The newspaper won the Pulitzer Prize for General News for its coverage of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Yarnold was one of three Pulitzer finalists for Editorial Writing in 2005. The Mercury News, the first newspaper to publish online, was consistently ranked among the nation’s 10 best newspapers and was widely recognized for its diversity initiatives and coverage of technology in Silicon Valley.
     
    “From the implementation of the California Hotbed strategy to the growth of Corporate Partnerships, from the build-out of our marketing-communications staff to his critical role in the U.S. Climate Action Partnership…David has helped reshape the organization,” said Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp.  “David has shown great courage in completely crossing career fields — something few people have the guts to even try — and even fewer succeed at.”
     
    The U.S. Climate Action Partnership (U.S. CAP) is a landmark alliance formed in 2007 of leading corporations and environmental leaders working together to urge the federal government to: cut greenhouse gas emissions 60-80 percent, create business incentives and, and to act swiftly and thoughtfully.
     
    In his new role as Executive Director, Yarnold is responsible for all operations at Environmental Defense, which also has offices in Beijing, China; San Francisco, Sacramento and Los Angeles, CA; Washington, DC; Boston, MA; Raleigh, NC; Austin, TX; and Bentonville, AK.
     
    “This dynamic organization understands that entrepreneurs, markets and business leadership often point to the quickest path to environmental success,” said Yarnold. “People know that innovation is the knife-edge of progress and is a better alternative than a wishful return to the past.”
     
    Prior to his dual promotion, Yarnold’s accomplishments at Environmental Defense include:
     
    • Environmental Defense’s revenues have skyrocketed from $55 million in 2005 to $78 million in 2007 and projected to be $116 million in 2008.
    • Authoring Environmental Defense’s California growth strategy, more than doubling its staff, creating a west coast Vice President and opening a state-of-the-art “green” office in San Francisco;
    • Playing a leading role in the launch of the United States Climate Action Partnership (US-CAP), a coalition of leading businesses and NGOs that support federal action on Climate Change;
    • Tripling Environmental Defense’s signature Corporate Partnerships programs that promote environmental, market-based solutions, including becoming the first environmental advocacy group to open an office in Bentonville, AK, to influence Wal-Mart’s environmental practices;
    • Doubling Environmental Defense’s communications capacity, with special emphasis on climate issues;
    • Playing a key leadership role for Environmental Defense in the passage of the nation’s most sweeping climate change legislation, The Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32), which the organization co-sponsored.
     
    Yarnold, his wife, Fran Smith, and daughter, Nicole, live in Dobbs Ferry, NY. He maintains strong ties to Silicon Valley, where he works with Valley companies and civic leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions that address some of the world’s most pressing challenges, especially climate change. 
    ### 
     
     
  • Conservation, Fishing Organizations Call for Balanced Solutions in Water Battle Over Apalachicola River Basin

    February 19, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Contact: Sharyn Stein 202-572-3396 or sstein@environmentaldefense.org
    Kevin Begos 850-653-3351 or kbegos@alum.mit.edu
    (Washington, D.C. – February 19, 2008) As officials from Alabama, Florida and Georgia missed yet another deadline last week to resolve tri-state water use conflicts in the Apalachicola Basin, a leading national environmental group, Environmental Defense, and the Franklin County Oyster & Seafood Task Force today called for a balanced approach to allocating the river’s flows.
    The Apalachicola/Flint/Chattahoochee basin runs from Lake Lanier near Atlanta to the Apalachicola Bay in Florida. The Bay and the lower Apalachicola River provide vital habitat for migratory birds, commercial and recreational fish such as flounder and redfish, blue crabs and oysters. Cities and farms throughout the basin depend on the system for some of their freshwater supply, but no legal framework exists for distributing the water among the states.
    “This issue is not about ‘mussels vs. people,’ as some have portrayed it,” said Mary Kelly, an attorney who co-directs the Land, Water and Wildlife Program at Environmental Defense. “It is about three states needing to find a way to ensure that all the vital needs served by the river are fairly balanced — from cities to farms to seafood producers to the environment.”
    “The right solution will depend on water conservation, allocating and trading water rights, and good science regarding how much freshwater the Apalachicola River and Bay need to sustain their productivity,” added Kelly. “It’s not easy, but it’s the only way to reach a lasting solution.”
    Clashes over water allocation have been simmering for decades, but they increased sharply during a drought last year that caused the city of Atlanta to worry about running out of water. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers designed a plan to ease Atlanta’s worries by increasing Georgia’s share of water from Lake Lanier and decreasing downstream releases from the reservoir. Florida sued to stop the plan, and won the suit in a court of appeals earlier this month. Negotiations among the three states to reach agreement are on-going and had faced a February 15th deadline imposed by the federal government.
    “Apalachicola Bay is one of the most productive coastal bays in the northern hemisphere. Our local fishing industry generates $134 million for the economy, and water sports-based tourism generates almost $200 million more,” said Kevin Begos of Florida’s Franklin County Oyster & Seafood Task Force. “The Corps’ plan would have severely restricted freshwater flows into the Bay, putting more than three thousand jobs at risk. We could lose entire industries – like our famous oyster beds and our Tupelo honey groves, which need fresh water to survive. Anyone who thinks that keeping water for Atlanta helps people over mussels is dead wrong – it’s just helping some people over others.”
    “Apalachicola Bay is a spawning ground for shrimp, fish, crabs and many other species,” said Tommy Ward, Chairman of the Franklin County Oyster & Seafood Task Force. “Hurting the bay hurts the entire Gulf of Mexico food chain.”
    A unique heritage is at risk, too. Apalachicola Bay is one of the last areas in the country where hundreds of baymen (and women) harvest oysters by hand, using long tongs.
    “We desperately need the water coming down across the floodplains to bring the nutrients to the bay,” said John Richards, president of the Seafood Workers Association. “Without it we are just a lost, dying breed.”
    Environmental Defense noted that the problems to be solved in this basin are becoming increasingly evident throughout the country.
    “Water conflicts are on the rise in the United States, and climate change will make them even more common, both here and around the world,” said Kelly. “”Cities and farms in the upper part of the basin have been very slow to adopt water conservation measures. It has taken this drought to make people see that we can’t continue to waste water.”
    “We need realistic and balanced plans to manage our water, and that means finding ways to keep entire river and bay systems healthy,” Kelly added. “Trying to fix one small area of an ecosystem will never work, any more than you can cure a disease by treating one symptom. There is still a chance to get it right in the Apalachicola, and that could be a model for other areas.”
    The groups recommended that the federal government and states move away from closed door negotiations and start a transparent process with all interested parties to:
    Use independent experts to determine the water flows that the river and the Apalachicola Bay need to maintain their vital productivity;
    Set legal limits on water use within the tri-state basin (i.e. “cap” the water use to ensure that river flow requirements can be met);
    Assess the water conservation potential among all users in the basin—agricultural, municipal and industrial—and determine the most cost-effective investments and who will pay for them; and
    Embody these agreements in a durable tri-state compact with strong enforcement mechanisms.
    ###
    Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. www.environmentaldefense.org

    The Franklin County Oyster & Seafood Task Force represents the local Seafood Industry and all those who work in it and seeks to protect the environment of Apalachicola River and Bay and promote its unique seafood heritage. 

     

  • 60 House Members Support $5.1 Billion in New Conservation Funding in Farm Bill

    February 19, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     
    Contact: Sean Crowley 202-572-3331 or scrowley@environmentaldefense.org
                   Sharyn Stein 202-572-3396 or sstein@environmentaldefense.org
     
    (Washington, D.C. – February 19, 2008) – As congressional leaders try to resolve the differences between the House- and Senate-passed farm bills, 60 House members today signed a bipartisan letter to House leaders urging them to support the Senate bill’s $5.1 billion increase in funding for U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation programs. The House farm bill provided almost $5 billion for these programs, which help farmers improve water and air quality and enhance wildlife habitat
     
    “Our farmers are eager to share in the cost of protecting our environment, but currently two out of three farmers are turned away by the USDA when they apply to participate in conservation programs due to insufficient funding,” said the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-MN) and House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Bob Goodlatte (R-VA). The lead authors of the letter are Reps. Chris Murphy (D-CT), Jim Ramstad (R-MN), Dave Reichert (R-WA), and Mike Thompson (D-CA).
     
    “While $5.1 billion in new spending for conservation programs is still not sufficient to meet farmer demand for conservation assistance, it represents a critical step in the right direction,” the letter added. “If some of the House- or Senate-approved tax provisions do not endure through conference, it is critical that other offsets be found to ensure that the farm bill provides a minimum of $5.1 billion in new conservation funding.”
     
    A leading environmental advocacy group, Environmental Defense, praised the lawmakers for sending the letter at a time when proposals are circulating among Senate and House conferees to reduce conservation spending.     
     
    “This letter demonstrates the broad, bipartisan support in the House for inclusion of a strong conservation title in this year’s farm bill,” said Sara Hopper, an attorney for Environmental Defense. “We hope members of the conference committee and House and Senate leaders will keep their colleagues’ strong support for conservation funding in mind as they work to finalize a farm bill that the president will sign.”
     
    Despite the fact that both the House and Senate provided approximately $5 billion in additional funding for conservation, the funding is at risk because President Bush has threatened to veto the final bill.
     
    “It’s important for lawmakers to work with the White House to get a farm bill done, but conservation programs shouldn’t be cut to make the math work,” added Hopper. “In a time of record net farm income and record prices for many crops, the nation can afford reasonable reductions in farm subsidies to get a bill the President will sign.” 
     
    The House members who signed the letter urging House leaders to adopt the Senate farm bill funding level for conservation programs are:  Jim Ramstad (R-MN), Dave Reichert (R-WA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Ben Chandler (D-KY), Ellen Tauscher (D-CA), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Tom Allen (D-ME), David Wu (D-OR), Bob Filner (D-CA), Joe Courtney (D-CT), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Lynn Woolsey (D-CA),  Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), Dave Loebsack (D-IA), Ron Kind (D-WI), Diana DeGette (D-CO), James Langevin (D-RI), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Mark Udall (D-CO), William Delahunt (D-MA), Donald Payne (D-NJ), Barney Frank (D-MA), Patrick Murphy (D-PA), Jim Saxton (R-NJ), John Olver (D-MA), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Lois Capps (D-CA), Michael Michaud (D-ME), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Paul Hodes (D-NH), Henry Waxman (D-CA), Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Rush Holt (D-NJ), John Dingell (D-MI), Gerald McNerney (D-CA), Peter Welch (D-VT), David Price (D-NC), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH), James Oberstar (D-MN), John Hall (D-NY), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Luis Fortuno (R-PR), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Allyson Schwartz (D-PA), Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), Chris Shays (R-CT), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Jay Inslee (D-WA), Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD), Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ), Tom Udall (D-NM), Michael Castle (R-DE), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), John Lewis (D-GA), Robert Wexler (D-FL).
     
    For more information about farm bill reform, visit www.environmentaldefense.org/farms.
     
    ###