Environmental Defense Criticizes Supreme Court Ruling
Environmental Defense today criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States, which held that under the Clean Water Act the US Army Corps of Engineers cannot prevent the pollution of isolated water bodies simply because they are used by migratory birds.
“The decision today puts in jeopardy perhaps a fifth of the water bodies in the United States, ranging from portions of the Everglades to the country’s most important breeding grounds for ducks,” said Tim Searchinger, senior attorney with Environmental Defense.
“This decision, while superficially supporting states’ rights, in fact undermines state efforts to protect wetlands and prevent surface and groundwater pollution,” said Searchinger. “The history of the last 30 years makes clear that state environmental efforts work best when they are buttressed by federal minimum standards. This decision could pull the rug out from under many state clean water efforts.”
“Twenty-two states explicitly bar state rules tougher than federal standards, so it is clear that states fear to protect their own environments unless they know industries can’t simply move to other states in search of more lax rules,” added Searchinger. “It is ironic that the Supreme Court calls for relying on states to protect isolated water bodies when many states make no effort to protect them.”
“Despite today’s decision, the Army Corps may be able to protect isolated water bodies on some basis other than use by migratory birds. Filling isolated ponds typically means that water that would have been stored in them must now go elsewhere, which sometimes causes flooding and pollution. The decision doesn’t discuss whether the Clean Water Act can regulate these water bodies because of these impacts downstream,” said Searchinger.
“The Supreme Court has also given itself a broad, vague new doctrine to strike down environmental laws it doesn’t like,” said Searchinger. “Congress is rarely more explicit about how its laws should apply than in this case. The Court has thus opened the door to many similar challenges to other environmental rules.”
One of the world’s leading international nonprofit organizations, Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org) creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships. With more than 3 million members and offices in the United States, China, Mexico, Indonesia and the European Union, EDF’s scientists, economists, attorneys and policy experts are working in 28 countries to turn our solutions into action. Connect with us on Twitter @EnvDefenseFund
Latest press releases
-
Biden Administration Investments Will Bolster Grid Resilience in the Wake of Severe Storms
October 18, 2024 -
Supreme Court Denies Requests to Block Climate Pollution Standards for Power Plants
October 16, 2024 -
Environmental Defense Fund Applauds Governor Shapiro’s Progress towards Implementing Methane Regulations
October 10, 2024 -
EDF Applauds Historic U.S. EPA Rule to Eliminate Lead Pipes
October 8, 2024 -
Supreme Court Will Not Block Two Vital Climate and Clean Air Protections
October 4, 2024 -
International Maritime Organization on the Brink of a Global System to Reduce Emissions from Shipping
October 4, 2024