COURT AFFIRMS HISTORIC CLEAN AIR STANDARDS
(March 26, 2002 — Washington, DC) Today a three-judge panel of the United States Federal Court of Appeals ruled for the second time on critical new health-based clean air standards, firmly rejecting industry’s renewed challenges to overturn the standards. On May 14, 1999, the same panel of judges ruled 2-1 that the standards were unconstitutional, only to be reversed in a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court on February 27, 2001. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the clean air standards at issue in 1997 to protect public health by limiting nationwide pollution levels of smog (ground-level ozone) and fine, sooty particles.
“It is a public health imperative that the Bush administration, our nation’s governors and mayors across the country take immediate action to begin making these clean air standards a reality,” said Environmental Defense senior attorney Vickie Patton. “For nearly five years, the legal wrangling by industry lawyers has delayed critical progress in delivering cleaner, healthier air to the millions of Americans that will be protected by these standards.”
When EPA issued the standards in 1997, it estimated that when implemented the standards would protect 125 million Americans from adverse health effects of air pollution and each year would prevent
15,000 premature deaths,
350,000 cases of aggravated asthma, and
1 million cases of significantly decreased lung function in children.
Since then, a body of scientific research has only strengthened the medical basis for the standards. On March 6, 2002, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study of 500,000 people across the country finding that prolonged exposure to air contaminated with fine particles significantly raises the risk of dying of lung cancer or other heart and lung diseases. Other recent studies have linked the pollutants at issue with increased risk of asthma in children (The Lancet, 2002; JAMA, 2001) (ozone); acute stroke mortality (Environmental Health Perspectives, 2002) (particulates and ozone); and birth defects (American Journal of Epidemiology, 2002) (ozone). A study of the 90 largest U.S. cities found strong evidence linking daily increases in particulate pollution at contemporary levels to increases in daily death rates, and in hospital admissions of the elderly (Health Effects Institute, 2000). Another study has indicated that chronic exposure to particulate pollution may shorten lives by one to three years (Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000).
Environmental Defense led a coalition of environmental organizations in helping to successfully defend the clean air standards in two related cases before the United States Supreme Court.
One of the world’s leading international nonprofit organizations, Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org) creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships. With more than 3 million members and offices in the United States, China, Mexico, Indonesia and the European Union, EDF’s scientists, economists, attorneys and policy experts are working in 28 countries to turn our solutions into action. Connect with us on Twitter @EnvDefenseFund
Latest press releases
-
EDF statement on COP29 outcome, new climate finance goal, Article 6
November 24, 2024 -
Historic Article 6 Decision at COP29 – After Much Debate, a Reasoned Solution
November 23, 2024 -
Russ Vought Nominated for Office of Management and Budget Director
November 23, 2024 -
Action on Pathways Initiative Proposal Will Boost Affordable, Reliable Clean Energy
November 22, 2024 -
EPA Acts to Reduce Dangerous Air Pollution from New Gas-Burning Power Plants
November 22, 2024 -
New York MTA receives final federal approvals for congestion pricing
November 22, 2024