Written by Moms Clean Air Force

WILDFIRE SMOKE AND YOUR HEALTH Children, the elderly, and people with heart disease, lung disease, and asthma are especially vulnerable to health problems caused by wildfire smoke. Wildfires affect not only people in the immediate area, but they also send vast amounts of dangerous pollution...

Written by Judith A. Ross

Resistance to proposed oil pipelines comes in many forms: Speaking up at local meetings, court filings contesting eminent domain, and physically occupying native lands, such as the protest led by the Standing Rock Sioux. More recently, in Nebraska, the resistance has taken a different form....

Tom Neltner, J.D., is Chemicals Policy Director In June 2017, the federal government updated the “Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home” booklet to expand the information provided on lead in drinking water from a few lines to a full page. Since 1996, when someone rents or buys a home built before 1978, the property […]

Written by Molly Rauch

The EPA has proposed to repeal emissions standards for “glider trucks,” which are trucks that have a dirty, outdated diesel engine in a shiny new truck body. This week, Moms Clean Air Force staff and volunteers testified at an EPA hearing in DC to urge...

Written by Marcia G. Yerman

On December 4, a busy news day that encompassed talk of collusion with Russia and an unpopular tax bill (which contains an under-the-radar provision for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge), Trump pronounced his goal of reducing protected acreage of the Bears Ears Monument...

Closing the data gap between farmers and investors is key to advancing agricultural sustainability.

Closing the data gap between farmers and investors is key to advancing agricultural sustainability.

Closing the data gap between farmers and investors is key to advancing agricultural sustainability.

In an affront to the health of all Americans, U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is trying to reopen a loophole for super-polluting glider trucks. This action reflects the worst of Washington politics: a special deal for the benefit of a single company; a sloppy, industry-funded analysis; and a process that shuts out EPA’s own staff […]

In an affront to the health of all Americans, U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is trying to reopen a loophole for super-polluting glider trucks. This action reflects the worst of Washington politics: a special deal for the benefit of a single company; a sloppy, industry-funded analysis; and a process that shuts out EPA’s own staff […]

Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Lead Senior Scientist. EPA held a public meeting today to present information on major changes it is making to its review of new chemicals under last year’s reforms made to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) by the Lautenberg Act. EPA provided brief opportunities for stakeholders to provide comments.  Two of […]

Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Lead Senior Scientist. EPA held a public meeting today to present information on major changes it is making to its review of new chemicals under last year’s reforms made to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) by the Lautenberg Act. EPA provided brief opportunities for stakeholders to provide comments.  Two of […]

Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Lead Senior Scientist. EPA held a public meeting today to present information on major changes it is making to its review of new chemicals under last year’s reforms made to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) by the Lautenberg Act. EPA provided brief opportunities for stakeholders to provide comments.  Two of […]

Zinke’s sage-grouse review signals shifting influences in Washington

As the comment period for the proposed changes to federal sage-grouse plans drew to a close last week, there is evidence that the administration may be ignoring a majority of voices across the West to cater exclusively to a few players in the oil and gas sector.

A recently leaked letter [PDF] to the U.S Department of the Interior from the Western Energy Alliance, an oil and gas trade and lobbying group, shows how closely the Bureau of Land Management’s proposed changes to protections for the imperiled bird align with WEA’s requests.

It is an affront to the ranchers, landowners, scientists, federal agency staff, state and local policymakers and countless other stakeholders who, over the course of many years, forged the sage-grouse recovery plans.

Importantly, this demonstrates how dramatically influence has shifted in Washington over the past year – and away from Western states.

Westerners speak out against Zinke’s plan

Yet, collaboration remains possible.

Several oil, gas and mining companies last week joined a diverse coalition of Wyoming groups, urging [PDF] the BLM to respect the state’s sage-grouse conservation plan and ensure the bird gets sufficient protection.

Across the West, sportsmen, ranchers and landowners are also weighing in.

The outcry over Zinke’s move underscores that a majority of Americans want to follow what the science tells us and give the existing sage-grouse plans room to work. It should signal to the interior secretary and other administrative leaders that they need to listen to the voices of the many, and not the few.

“Give these plans a chance” 

“As hunters we believe the best course forward is to give these plans a chance,” wrote Brian Brooks, an Idaho hunter, in an opinion piece in his local newspaper. “The best way to improve the health of wildlife is to improve the health of their habitat, the same habitat that literally fuels our big game species.”

Tom Sharp, an Oregon rancher and landowner, cautioned that changing or scrapping the existing sage-grouse plans could ultimately lead to the bird getting listed as an endangered species.

“We are walking somewhat of a fine line here – there’s a balance here,” he wrote. “Any plan amendments that we make going forward should follow the science.”

And Mike Penfold, a former BLM state director for Montana, the Dakotas and Alaska, noted that Zinke’s review makes the path forward less clear for industry and landowners.

“In the 50 years that I’ve been involved in land management discussion, I can say that I’ve never seen the same type of collaboration amongst disparate interests – from ranchers to sportsmen and women to those in the oil and gas industry,” Penfold wrote. “No sense in taking what is arguably the gold standard for conservation collaboration and rip it apart now.”

It’s not too late

There is still an opportunity for Secretary Zinke to come down on the right side of history. The proposed changes to the federal sage-grouse plans are just that: They are proposed, but not yet law.

With the closing of the public comment period, Secretary Zinke now has the opportunity to listen to Americans who urge his department to stay the course on the sage-grouse, rather than catering to a group of oil and gas companies with short-term economic interests.

He can put science over politics, keeping the best policy in place to avoid a future Endangered Species Act listing for the bird – and show that Washington is working for the American public.

An alarming choice Why Honeycutt has no business on EPA’s science advisory panel krives December 6, 2017 - 12:49

See comments

Zinke needs to listen to the people.

Ronald McLane December 7, 2017 at 3:07 pm

Agree

Pat Ferral December 18, 2017 at 6:10 pm

In reply to Zinke needs to listen to the… by Ronald McLane

While I do not believe this guy cares, certainly hoping someone in DC can stop this abomination.

Lu Smith December 7, 2017 at 5:15 pm

Listen to science. Not the oil and gas companies. Do the right thing please

Sheila Massie December 7, 2017 at 8:46 pm

You have no right to destroy our country for you greed. We are to be caretakers of God’s land.

Jeanne Lane December 7, 2017 at 9:26 pm

Please leave sage-grouse protections in place. Thank you

Beverly Boyce December 7, 2017 at 10:17 pm

Please listen to the scientists, ecologists, land owners, and not the special interest gas and oil. Leave the sage-grouse protections in place, let the plan work. Do the right thing!

Melody Evans December 8, 2017 at 10:33 pm

The preservation of life is more important than making some extra money which is only a temporary gain with a permanent devastating loss.

Oliver Stubbs December 9, 2017 at 12:04 am