How the next Colorado governor can make good on a key water goal
Alternative Transfer Mechanisms provide an opportunity to help Colorado create a more resilient water system in a way that benefits farms, communities, and our rivers and streams.
The post How the next Colorado governor can make good on a key water goal first appeared on Growing Returns.How the next Colorado governor can make good on a key water goal
Alternative Transfer Mechanisms provide an opportunity to help Colorado create a more resilient water system in a way that benefits farms, communities, and our rivers and streams.
The post How the next Colorado governor can make good on a key water goal first appeared on Growing Returns.How the next Colorado governor can make good on a key water goal
How the next Colorado governor can make good on a key water goal
We can solve North Carolina’s manure challenges. Here's how.
We can solve North Carolina’s manure challenges. Here’s how.
We can solve North Carolina’s manure challenges. Here's how.
From pigs to prairie grass: Missouri company seeks new biogas feedstock
Gov. Cuomo Touts Congestion Pricing as “Only Realistic Option” for Fixing Subway
Coal Bailout Request in Illinois Gets Pushback, Concerns for Impacted Communities Remain
The Mesoamerican Reef: A shared vision for prosperity and conservation
It’s time to close EPA’s harmful new air toxics loophole
It’s time to close EPA’s harmful new air toxics loophole
It’s time to close EPA’s harmful new air toxics loophole
5 Things About Trump’s EPA Assault on the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
Written by Moms Clean Air Force
This was written by Mandy Warner, senior manager of Climate and Air Policy at EDF: In 1990, while I was busy with kid priorities like learning to roller-skate, Congress was updating the Clean Air Act – kicking off a process to reduce mercury and other...
My Toddler’s Mercury Poisoning from Tuna
Written by Moms Clean Air Force
This is a guest post by author, Ayelet Waldman: When my daughter Sophie was four years old, she was, in many ways, a Jewish mother’s dream. Her favorite lunch wasn’t pizza or hamburgers or chicken McNuggets. My little girl loved nothing better than a tuna sandwich...
EDF, Health Associations, Leading States Go to Court to Argue for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Why a Supreme Court case over a single frog could jeopardize wildlife for years to come
- The first case of the Supreme Court’s new term could set a dangerous precedent for how we protect habitat that species may depend on in the future.
- The Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service case comes as wildlife ranges and behaviors are beginning to shift amid climate change, with both real and perceived conflicts occurring between species’ needs and landowners’ interests.
A lot more than an endangered frog was at stake Monday when the Supreme Court heard Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the first case of the court’s new term. The court’s decision could set a precedent for how America protects critical habitat for years to come.
The case goes back to 2014, when the timber giant sued the federal government after it designated a 1,544-acre parcel of land the company owns and leases in Louisiana as critical habitat for the endangered dusky gopher frog.
The question at the center of the case is whether federal agencies can require private landowners to protect habitat for a species that no longer exists on their property – but historically did and may again in the future.
Should the justices rule in favor of Weyerhaeuser and its co-petitioners, it could have ramifications for critical habitat designations going forward, and at a most critical time. Wildlife ranges and behaviors are beginning to shift as our climate changes, which means habitat boundaries are becoming more fluid.
It’s also why this case is being watched so closely by landowners, industry and conservationists.
Only 135 frogs leftThe dusky gopher frog used to live across Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. When the frog was added to the endangered species list in 2001, all known members of the species were concentrated in a single pond in Mississippi. The Fish and Wildlife Service estimated in 2015 there were as few as 135 frogs left.
The geographic isolation makes the species more vulnerable to threats such as disease, low genetic variability, weather and climate disturbances. The only way to address such challenges is to expand available habitat by identifying and protecting areas to which these species could seek refuge.
That was the case in this instance when the government identified and designated “Unit 1” in St. Tammany Parish near New Orleans as unoccupied critical habitat.
Indeed, the Fish and Wildlife Service is required to consider how species will adapt to climate change when determining what’s essential for conservation. Making unoccupied habitat available can be a critical and doable solution, especially when landowners are provided incentives for improving wildlife habitat on their property.
4 reasons the Trump administration’s ESA plan is as illegal as it’s bad for wildlifeThe justices’ ruling will have impacts not just for the frog, but for countless other species that will increasingly look to unoccupied habitat for survival.
Policy can address economic loss, other burdensWeyerhaeuser and the other landowners who joined the lawsuit say the critical habitat designation could cost them up to $34 million in lost value. The federal government estimated economic impacts that ranged from zero to $34 million, depending on how the land was eventually developed.
Such economic burdens, some of which are real and some that may be perceived, can be addressed through policy solutions that spread economic impacts more equitably.
Such solutions already exist to reduce burdens on landowners. Weyerhaeuser itself has entered into Safe Harbor agreements for the spotted owl and red-cockaded woodpecker, supporting species recovery while reducing future regulatory requirements.
Thoughtful assessment of the real burdens of conservation – free from hyperbole and political machinations – is the first step toward reducing conflict around critical habitat. Whether we’ll achieve that could hinge on the precedent the Supreme Court sets over a single endangered frog.
Friday digests from our staff keep you up to date on the week’s events.
Thanks for subscribing to In case you missed it
krives October 2, 2018 - 03:55Why a Supreme Court case over a single frog could jeopardize wildlife for years to come
- The first case of the Supreme Court’s new term could set a dangerous precedent for how we protect habitat that species may depend on in the future.
- The Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service case comes as wildlife ranges and behaviors are beginning to shift amid climate change, with both real and perceived conflicts occurring between species’ needs and landowners’ interests.
A lot more than an endangered frog was at stake Monday when the Supreme Court heard Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the first case of the court’s new term. The court’s decision could set a precedent for how America protects critical habitat for years to come.
The case goes back to 2014, when the timber giant sued the federal government after it designated a 1,544-acre parcel of land the company owns and leases in Louisiana as critical habitat for the endangered dusky gopher frog.
The question at the center of the case is whether federal agencies can require private landowners to protect habitat for a species that no longer exists on their property – but historically did and may again in the future.
Should the justices rule in favor of Weyerhaeuser and its co-petitioners, it could have ramifications for critical habitat designations going forward, and at a most critical time. Wildlife ranges and behaviors are beginning to shift as our climate changes, which means habitat boundaries are becoming more fluid.
It’s also why this case is being watched so closely by landowners, industry and conservationists.
Only 135 frogs leftThe dusky gopher frog used to live across Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. When the frog was added to the endangered species list in 2001, all known members of the species were concentrated in a single pond in Mississippi. The Fish and Wildlife Service estimated in 2015 there were as few as 135 frogs left.
The geographic isolation makes the species more vulnerable to threats such as disease, low genetic variability, weather and climate disturbances. The only way to address such challenges is to expand available habitat by identifying and protecting areas to which these species could seek refuge.
That was the case in this instance when the government identified and designated “Unit 1” in St. Tammany Parish near New Orleans as unoccupied critical habitat.
Indeed, the Fish and Wildlife Service is required to consider how species will adapt to climate change when determining what’s essential for conservation. Making unoccupied habitat available can be a critical and doable solution, especially when landowners are provided incentives for improving wildlife habitat on their property.
4 reasons the Trump administration’s ESA plan is as illegal as it’s bad for wildlifeThe justices’ ruling will have impacts not just for the frog, but for countless other species that will increasingly look to unoccupied habitat for survival.
Policy can address economic loss, other burdensWeyerhaeuser and the other landowners who joined the lawsuit say the critical habitat designation could cost them up to $34 million in lost value. The federal government estimated economic impacts that ranged from zero to $34 million, depending on how the land was eventually developed.
Such economic burdens, some of which are real and some that may be perceived, can be addressed through policy solutions that spread economic impacts more equitably.
Such solutions already exist to reduce burdens on landowners. Weyerhaeuser itself has entered into Safe Harbor agreements for the spotted owl and red-cockaded woodpecker, supporting species recovery while reducing future regulatory requirements.
Thoughtful assessment of the real burdens of conservation – free from hyperbole and political machinations – is the first step toward reducing conflict around critical habitat. Whether we’ll achieve that could hinge on the precedent the Supreme Court sets over a single endangered frog.
Friday digests from our staff keep you up to date on the week’s events.
Thanks for subscribing to In case you missed it
krives October 2, 2018 - 03:55The Trump EPA is Silencing the Woman Fighting for Our Children
Written by Dominique Browning
Our children’s brains develop rapidly as they move through their toddler years and beyond; their lungs pump faster and they breathe more air compared to adults, and their little beloved hearts beat faster than adult hearts do. They’re crawling around on the floor, so they’re...