EPA Acting Administrator Wheeler’s Toxic Chemical Agenda is Dangerous
Written by Moms Clean Air Force
Moms across the country fought hard to win the Lautenberg Chemicals Safety for the 21st Century Act. Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) and Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla) came together in an unprecedented bipartisan effort to protect us from dangerous chemicals and passed the bill in 2016. The new...
Correction: The Trump EPA’s first TSCA risk evaluation is a skyscraper of cards, not just a house
Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Lead Senior Scientist. Jennifer McPartland, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist. We blogged before the holiday break about how EPA used a single, unverified and conflicted estimate of worker exposure to build a whole house of cards and then used it to conclude that Pigment Violet 29 (or PV29) poses no risk to human […]
The post Correction: The Trump EPA’s first TSCA risk evaluation is a skyscraper of cards, not just a house first appeared on EDF Health.
Correction: The Trump EPA’s first TSCA risk evaluation is a skyscraper of cards, not just a house
Correction: The Trump EPA’s first TSCA risk evaluation is a skyscraper of cards, not just a house
Correction: The Trump EPA’s first TSCA risk evaluation is a skyscraper of cards, not just a house
Correction: The Trump EPA’s first TSCA risk evaluation is a skyscraper of cards, not just a house
Trump EPA’s Final Methylene Chloride Ban Fails to Protect Workers
Prolonged Government Shutdown Puts Public Health and the Environment at Risk
Gov. Wolf Takes Another Strong Step, Committing to Limiting Climate Pollution in Pennsylvania
Peoples Gas, EDF Unveil New Commitment to Help Protect the Climate by Cutting Methane Emissions From Pittsburgh Utility System in Half
Trump EPA’s Final Methylene Chloride Ban Fails to Protect Workers
Prolonged Government Shutdown Puts Public Health and the Environment at Risk
Gov. Wolf Takes Another Strong Step, Committing to Limiting Climate Pollution in Pennsylvania
EDF Energy Program @EDFEnergyEX
EDF Energy Program @EDFEnergyEX
New year, new strategy for FirstEnergy? Nope.
Welcome to 2019! It may be a new year, but FirstEnergy is still at its old tricks.
Remember in late 2016 when the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) gave the utility $600 million? Despite claims of grid modernization, regulators admitted that the money was nothing more than a blank check that the utility giant could do with as it pleased.
FirstEnergy wanted the funds to improve its credit rating, which was low as a result of bad business decisions. Yet this past year FirstEnergy shed millions of debts by declaring bankruptcy for its subsidiary and saw its stock value rise more than 20 percent. Pretty hard to justify any credit support, let alone $600 million.
EDF, along with other environmental groups, are crying foul. Because the bailout is so unreasonable, we’ve asked the Ohio Supreme Court to overturn it. The process is officially kicking off with the oral argument, which begins this Wednesday January 9. Our lawyers will be there and we’ll follow the case closely, with a decision expected later this year.
For past newsletters and other updates, you can always visit our FirstEnergy landing page.
The “FirstEnergy” brand, primarily driven by parent company FirstEnergy Corp., has value and advertising dollars behind it. For example, the Cleveland Browns play their home games at FirstEnergy Stadium because the Browns are big fans of the politically powerful utility. Just kidding – FirstEnergy Corp. paid for the naming rights.
Consumer groups and energy marketers want the new company to either relinquish or pay for the right to use the name “FirstEnergy Solutions.”
We understand why these groups would want to prevent the bankrupt company from benefitting from any value this name might have. What we don’t understand is why the new company would want to use the FirstEnergy name – it’s like naming a new ship after the Titanic. Return of the ZEN New year, new strategy? Nope.
Gongwer reports that a couple of Ohio legislators intend to revive the controversial bills to bail out FirstEnergy’s nuclear power plants, fondly called the ZEN (zero-emission nuclear) proposal. The idea went nowhere last year – not in the regular legislative session nor the lame duck.
The thing is, if you’re looking to decarbonize Ohio’s power sector, energy efficiency and renewables are a safer, more cost-effective bet.
Moreover, the grid operator responsible for reliability in Ohio and many other states, PJM, recently found “there is ‘no imminent threat’ to keeping the lights on as coal and nuclear power plants close.”
So, why do FirstEnergy these few legislators keep trying to make Ohioans pay for the uneconomic clunkers? Just when FirstEnergy thought bankruptcy was its biggest problem… Porcupines started getting aggressive around FirstEnergy’s hydroelectric plant in New Jersey. --> --> Copyright © 2019 Environmental Defense Fund |Energy, All rights reserved.
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.
Mercury in Our Air
Written by Moms Clean Air Force
Welcome to 2019, a year in which our battles against dozens of harmful EPA rollbacks gets even more intense. To kick things off: While many families were enjoying a holiday break, Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced that EPA would begin to undo the very...
Why clean energy investments should be part of your risk management strategy
Why clean energy investments should be part of your risk management strategy
From villages to states, significant progress on lead service line replacement in 2018
Sam Lovell, Project Specialist and Tom Neltner, J.D., Chemicals Policy Director We recently finished a round of updates to our webpages recognizing states and communities leading the way in efforts to accelerate lead service line (LSL) replacement across the country. As we start the New Year, we wanted to summarize the good news from 2018 and […]
The post From villages to states, significant progress on lead service line replacement in 2018 first appeared on EDF Health.