Carbon removal technologies to help tackle climate change? Here’s what it’ll take.

This is a summary of an essay published in Foreign Affairs.

A wave of destructive hurricanes, heat spells and wildfires has ravaged communities across the United States over the past year – bringing new urgency to the need for climate action, as both scientists and citizens are able to connect these extreme events to a warming Earth.

Time is of the essence, but it's not too late to solve the global climate crisis. A decade of extraordinary innovation has made a greening of the global economy not just feasible, but likely. Now a whole new arsenal is emerging in the fight against climate change: negative emission technologies.

Alongside aggressive action to cut emissions, these technologies will be crucial to reaching "net zero" carbon emissions – the point where any climate pollution we add to the atmosphere is balanced by what we take out. The U.S. must reach this goal by 2050, with the world as a whole reaching net zero as soon as possible thereafter, if we are to stabilize our atmosphere.

$1 billion – just to research it

NETs are different from conventional approaches to climate mitigation because rather than seeking to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases we've emitted into the atmosphere, they focus on removing carbon dioxide that's already there. 

Sign up for updates on innovations that help reach net zero emissions:

Thank you for subscribing to the Climate Tech Brief.

Some NETs are ready to be deployed today, including land management practices that store more carbon in agricultural soils and forests. Others are at the pilot stage – like direct air carbon capture machines that suck carbon out of the sky and store it underground. And then there are some on the horizon, such as technologies that mimic natural rock weathering practices on a vastly accelerated time scale.

A key challenge is getting to scale. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recently estimated that to meet its climate targets, the world will need to remove as much as 10 gigatons of CO2 from the atmosphere each year by mid-century – nearly twice the current annual emissions in the U.S. from burning fossil fuels.

The report recommends as much as $1 billion annually in U.S. government funding for research on NETs.

Airlines could pave the way for NETs

We've long known that pricing emissions through a carbon tax or an emissions trading system creates an economic incentive for cheaper, faster ways to cut pollution. Valuing negative emissions – through tax rebates or tradeable credits for removal – would spur countless more entrepreneurs to join the hunt for NETs.

Standing in the way of those incentives is the lack of a global market for carbon credits. But progress on that front is coming from an unlikely place: aviation.

Airlines, which account for about 2 percent of global carbon emissions today and are set to triple or quadruple such pollution by mid-century, have agreed to cap the CO2 emissions from international flights at 2020 levels with the help of a global carbon credit program.

A pot of gold will await companies that cut or remove aviation carbon emissions.

Done right, this program – the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation, or "CORSIA" – could catalyze a global carbon market that drives investment in low-carbon fuels and technologies such as NETs.

Over the first 15 years of CORSIA, demand for aviation credits is estimated to reach between 2.5 billion and 3 billion tons – roughly equal to the greenhouse gas emissions the U.S. power and manufacturing sectors release annually.

With this new demand, there is a good possibility that a pot of gold will await companies that develop technologies to cut or remove aviation carbon emissions. CORSIA could also spur investment in NETs to make cleaner jet fuel, for example by producing fuel from waste or biomass through processes that, on balance, absorb more carbon than they emit.

Carbon removal must be part of Plan A

Scientists and activists have historically tended to regard negative emission technologies as a fallback option, to be held in reserve in case other efforts fail. Many fear that jumping ahead and spending billions to suck carbon from the sky or to develop massive forest carbon sinks will distract from the critical need to cut pollution.

But the world no longer has the luxury of waiting for emission reduction strategies to do the job alone. Far from being a Plan B, NETs must be a critical part of Plan A, and embracing them sooner rather than later makes economic sense.

Because the marginal costs of emission reductions rise as more emissions are cut, it will be cheaper to deploy NETs at the same time as emission reduction technologies rather than waiting to exhaust those options first.

Many NETs are ready to be deployed at scale today, and they could help make the difference between limiting warming to bearable levels, and failing to do so. Thanks to the emerging global carbon market for aviation, we may soon be on our way.

Get innovation updates

We'll send regular updates about developments in technology, science and the environment.

Thank you for subscribing to the Climate Tech Brief.

krives February 12, 2019 - 10:29

See comments

Politicians and business leadership ignore global warming at the peril of all people.

Stephen a Johnson February 12, 2019 at 6:24 pm

Reforestation and new agricultural practices could also trap carbon and help slow warming. But direct removal will still be necessary. With direct-air capture, the most obvious option is to store carbon underground. But technologies that create a sellable product will help reduce costs.

Three of the biggest direct-air carbon removal companies – Carbon Engineering, Climeworks, and Global Thermostat – are all working to store CO2 in something useable. Carbon Engineering markets a carbon-neutral fuel. Climeworks sends carbon to fertilizers, fuels and soon, the beverage industry. Global Thermostat sells the gas for a wide range of purposes.

Products made with carbon don’t demand a high enough price boost capture around the world, so expanding them will require government intervention. 

James Gimbel February 14, 2019 at 2:07 am

I suggest a yearly week or two weeks off for airlines. Many people need a second and a third look to see how important a blue sky is. We are convinced we have to have so many energy sources, yet people have lived fine for thousands of years without. Cell phones are an example, & they could be used for emergencies only. Car engines could be designed to meet the speed limit which is not related to 500 break horse power! Then there is lung cancer which makes me wonder.

Robert Jones July 19, 2019 at 3:08 pm

Los Angeles announces plans to close last of three gas plants.

Statements by Timothy O'Connor and Maurice Hall on Newsom speech.

Comment on Gov. Gavin Newsom appointments to California State Water Resources Control Board and departure of longtime chair Felicia Marcus.

EPA's Draft Inventory Shows More Measurement Data is Needed on Oil and Gas Methane Emissions

New in Foreign Affairs: We Can't Reach Our Climate Goals without Technologies that Remove Pollution from the Atmosphere

Written by Diane MacEachern

The Green New Deal hit the US with the force of a Katrina-sized hurricane when it was unveiled last week – and yes, the comparison is fitting. The GND, as it’s being called, aims to eliminate the carbon emissions fueling climate change and the resulting...

This fix could solve a major problem. We need to make sure the legislature passes it. Regional. C4.

This fix could solve a major problem. We need to make sure the legislature passes it. Regional. C4.

On today’s show Blaise Pezold, Coastal & Environmental Program Manager of the Meraux Foundation joins the program to talk with Jacques & Simone about what he does for the Meraux Foundation, what a typical day entails, what it was like to help design the Bayou La Loutre Ridge & Marsh restoration project and more! Erin Brown, from National Wildlife Federation’s Vanishing Paradise program also stops by to talk with Jacques & Simone about Cook Off for the Coast, duck hunting ...

Read The Full Story

The post Delta Dispatches: The Meraux Foundation appeared first on Restore the Mississippi River Delta.

On today’s show Blaise Pezold, Coastal & Environmental Program Manager of the Meraux Foundation joins the program to talk with Jacques & Simone about what he does for the Meraux Foundation, what a typical day entails, what it was like to help design the Bayou La Loutre Ridge & Marsh restoration project and more! Erin Brown, from National Wildlife Federation’s Vanishing Paradise program also stops by to talk with Jacques & Simone about Cook Off for the Coast, duck hunting ...

Read The Full Story

The post Delta Dispatches: The Meraux Foundation appeared first on Restore the Mississippi River Delta.

With these steps in place, state leaders can rapidly deploy environmental restoration projects that reduce flood risks while providing year-round benefits to families, farms, communities and nature.

The post Immediate steps for North Carolina policymakers to reduce flood risks and build resilience first appeared on Growing Returns.

With these steps in place, state leaders can rapidly deploy environmental restoration projects that reduce flood risks while providing year-round benefits to families, farms, communities and nature.