First-of-its-kind effort will provide timely, transparent data to spotlight oil and gas methane reduction opportunities, help curtail regional air and climate pollution

A new low even for the Trump EPA on chemical safety

Recent decisions by the Environmental Protection Agency are failing to protect workers from the leading cause of asthma in the workplace: a class of chemicals called isocyanates.

It's a new low in this administration’s implementation of the nation’s chemical safety law, the Toxic Substances Control Act, or TSCA.

First — a bit of background for understanding how this happened and why it presents an even more concerning turn in the Trump EPA’s reckless approval process for new chemicals to enter the market.

Nasty chemicals that endanger workers

Isocyanates (pronounced “eye-soh-SY’-uh-nayts”) are nasty chemicals used in various industrial processes as well as everyday materials and products.

They are dangerous when they’re left unreacted as “residuals” after manufacturing other chemicals or in products such as paints, insulation and certain plastics.

In prior new chemical reviews under TSCA, the EPA repeatedly indicated that “[i]socyanate exposure has been identified as the leading attributable cause of work-related asthma, and prevalence in the exposed workforce has been estimated at 1-20 percent” (emphasis added).

The EPA in the recent past imposed various restrictions and concentration limits on isocyanates. The conditions have included:

• A prohibition on activities that could put the chemical into the air workers are breathing.
• Mandatory requirements for use of respirators and gloves.
• Strict limits on the amount of unreacted isocyanates allowed to be present in the new chemical.

How the Trump EPA is risking workers' health But now: Few or no restrictions, no protections

Considering the high worker risks and the history of the EPA’s statements and actions on such chemicals, how has the Trump EPA been treating new chemicals with residual isocyanates?

Over the last year alone, in at least 10 such cases, the EPA has declared the chemicals “not likely to present an unreasonable risk,” clearing them for market access without requiring their manufacturers to employ any of these protections — even in cases where the EPA has specifically identified significant risks to workers.

The determinations, and lack of restrictions, are particularly astounding because they are based on the EPA’s unfounded “expectation” that employers would universally require and workers would use suitable protective equipment.

For one new isocyanate, while the Trump EPA did propose a rule that would require companies to notify the EPA before exceeding a residual concentration, the concentration level the EPA set is vastly higher than the level it has set in the past, as needed to protect health.

Trump’s EPA is caving to industry

The clear winner at least in the short term is the chemical industry. The American Chemistry Council — the main trade association for chemical companies — has pressured the EPA to loosen limits on isocyanates for years.

Now, it appears its wishes are being granted — without the EPA providing any explanation for the abrupt shift in practice or any public notice and opportunity for comment.

For many of these new isocyanates, much of the information about them — who plans to make the chemical and where, how it will be used, and even the identity of the chemical itself — is withheld from the public because it is claimed to be confidential.

However, what we do know is disturbing: Often against career staff recommendations and the agency’s own risk findings, the EPA has abandoned precedent and approved numerous new chemicals with residual isocyanates to enter the market with few or no restrictions on their manufacture or use.

Once again, the EPA is caving to the chemical industry’s demands, and worker health is being left in the dust.

Take action: Don't let Trump reverse chemical safety progress mmelendez October 1, 2019 - 03:30

A new low even for the Trump EPA on chemical safety

Recent decisions by the Environmental Protection Agency are failing to protect workers from the leading cause of asthma in the workplace: a class of chemicals called isocyanates.

It's a new low in this administration’s implementation of the nation’s chemical safety law, the Toxic Substances Control Act, or TSCA.

First — a bit of background for understanding how this happened and why it presents an even more concerning turn in the Trump EPA’s reckless approval process for new chemicals to enter the market.

Nasty chemicals that endanger workers

Isocyanates (pronounced “eye-soh-SY’-uh-nayts”) are nasty chemicals used in various industrial processes as well as everyday materials and products.

They are dangerous when they’re left unreacted as “residuals” after manufacturing other chemicals or in products such as paints, insulation and certain plastics.

In prior new chemical reviews under TSCA, the EPA repeatedly indicated that “[i]socyanate exposure has been identified as the leading attributable cause of work-related asthma, and prevalence in the exposed workforce has been estimated at 1-20 percent” (emphasis added).

The EPA in the recent past imposed various restrictions and concentration limits on isocyanates. The conditions have included:

• A prohibition on activities that could put the chemical into the air workers are breathing.
• Mandatory requirements for use of respirators and gloves.
• Strict limits on the amount of unreacted isocyanates allowed to be present in the new chemical.

How the Trump EPA is risking workers' health But now: Few or no restrictions, no protections

Considering the high worker risks and the history of the EPA’s statements and actions on such chemicals, how has the Trump EPA been treating new chemicals with residual isocyanates?

Over the last year alone, in at least 10 such cases, the EPA has declared the chemicals “not likely to present an unreasonable risk,” clearing them for market access without requiring their manufacturers to employ any of these protections — even in cases where the EPA has specifically identified significant risks to workers.

The determinations, and lack of restrictions, are particularly astounding because they are based on the EPA’s unfounded “expectation” that employers would universally require and workers would use suitable protective equipment.

For one new isocyanate, while the Trump EPA did propose a rule that would require companies to notify the EPA before exceeding a residual concentration, the concentration level the EPA set is vastly higher than the level it has set in the past, as needed to protect health.

Trump’s EPA is caving to industry

The clear winner at least in the short term is the chemical industry. The American Chemistry Council — the main trade association for chemical companies — has pressured the EPA to loosen limits on isocyanates for years.

Now, it appears its wishes are being granted — without the EPA providing any explanation for the abrupt shift in practice or any public notice and opportunity for comment.

For many of these new isocyanates, much of the information about them — who plans to make the chemical and where, how it will be used, and even the identity of the chemical itself — is withheld from the public because it is claimed to be confidential.

However, what we do know is disturbing: Often against career staff recommendations and the agency’s own risk findings, the EPA has abandoned precedent and approved numerous new chemicals with residual isocyanates to enter the market with few or no restrictions on their manufacture or use.

Once again, the EPA is caving to the chemical industry’s demands, and worker health is being left in the dust.

Take action: Don't let Trump reverse chemical safety progress mmelendez October 1, 2019 - 03:30

So we need to get started addressing the climate crisis TODAY, by demanding a transition to a 100% clean economy by 2050. DOF. C3. Regional.

So we need to get started addressing the climate crisis TODAY, by demanding a transition to a 100% clean economy by 2050. DOF. C3. Regional.

100% Clean by 2030: Our Plan to Tackle Air Pollution cittner Tue, 10/01/2019 - 18:50 Air Quality Blog By Bryony Worthington

The Clean Energy Jobs Act is one of Illinois’ biggest opportunities to become a national clean energy leader, but with the fall veto session just four weeks away, its future could be in jeopardy if legislators don’t understand what’s at stake. The economic, environmental and health benefits of CEJA are innumerable: workforce hubs for clean […]

The post Illinois must take immediate action on the Clean Energy Jobs Act appeared first on Energy Exchange.

The Clean Energy Jobs Act is one of Illinois’ biggest opportunities to become a national clean energy leader, but with the fall veto session just four weeks away, its future could be in jeopardy if legislators don’t understand what’s at stake. The economic, environmental and health benefits of CEJA are innumerable: workforce hubs for clean […]

The Clean Energy Jobs Act is one of Illinois’ biggest opportunities to become a national clean energy leader, but with the fall veto session just four weeks away, its future could be in jeopardy if legislators don’t understand what’s at stake. The economic, environmental and health benefits of CEJA are innumerable: workforce hubs for clean […]

In the Face of Federal Methane Rollbacks, Governor Wolf Must Fill the Void & Take Swift Action to Cut Methane from Sources in Pennsylvania. MCAF. Regional. C3.

In the Face of Federal Methane Rollbacks, Governor Wolf Must Fill the Void & Take Swift Action to Cut Methane from Sources in Pennsylvania. MCAF. Regional. C3.

Written by Moms Clean Air Force

Community Rx is a faith-based climate campaign dedicated to advocacy in African-American communities. Moms Clean Air Force's Community Rx consultant, Tonya Calhoun, along with Moms Clean Air Force staff, attended and presented at the National Baptist Convention.

On today’s bonus episode of Delta Dispatches, Jacques sits down with Shannon Cunniff, who recently retired after 27 years working at the heart of environmental policy. Shannon discusses her career highlights, ranging from working for a federal agency at the intersection of water resources and coastal resilience to working for the Environmental Defense Fund and serving as a board member for the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association. In this interview Jacques and Shannon talk about her inspirational career – ...

Read The Full Story

The post Delta Dispatches: Bonus Episode with Shannon Cunniff! appeared first on Restore the Mississippi River Delta.

On today’s bonus episode of Delta Dispatches, Jacques sits down with Shannon Cunniff, who recently retired after 27 years working at the heart of environmental policy. Shannon discusses her career highlights, ranging from working for a federal agency at the intersection of water resources and coastal resilience to working for the Environmental Defense Fund and serving as a board member for the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association. In this interview Jacques and Shannon talk about her inspirational career – ...

Read The Full Story

The post Delta Dispatches: Bonus Episode with Shannon Cunniff! appeared first on Restore the Mississippi River Delta.

Written by Diane MacEachern

Dr. Jane Goodall and the Interfaith Rainforest Initiative, a global effort to mobilize the world’s religions to help stop tropical deforestation, come together to halt climate change.

Written by Amy Ziff

Find out if your child's school has hazardous mercury rubber-like flooring and learn what you can do about it.

On today’s episode of Delta Dispatches, we talk with Lauren Averill, Jefferson Parish Coastal Zone Director, and ASPBA Central Gulf Coast Board member. Lauren discusses the history and importance of coastal management in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana’s most populous coastal parish, and highlights a number of restoration projects underway in the parish.   Listen Now:

The post Delta Dispatches: Coastal Management in Jefferson Parish appeared first on Restore the Mississippi River Delta.